Week beginning November 12 2025

John Bassett, Rachel Crothers Broadway Innovator, Feminist Pioneer, Bloomsbury Academic, August 2025.

Thank you, Net Galley and Bloomsbury Academic, for this uncorrected proof for review.

This book is not only about an intriguing and successful professional woman but written by someone who genuinely seems to admire her. John Bassett’s commitment to Rachel Crothers permeates the writing, making it a sheer joy to read. Bassett corrects some misconceptions but explains how they might have come about. His comic touch in reference to those about Crothers age, appears in an aside after his serious discussion of this anomaly and augers well for the way in which he approaches his material. His disappointment that Crothers’ work has almost disappeared, certainly from the stage, and from academic works and books for some time, does not impede his positive approach. He wastes little time on criticising; his reflections are illuminating, but he never diverts from his purpose. This is to redeem the oversight. His enthusiasm to ensure that Rachel Crothers and her work does become known makes this a thoroughly readable book. Bassett has written about Crothers in a work to savour as well as to inform.

The extensive detail provided about Crothers’ plays offers readers an experience akin to being part of her audience. Through this attention to the work, and Crothers’ reaction to reviews together with analysis of the critical reception of her work they exhibit, she emerges as a known figure. One that is a pleasure to know, written about by someone who also feels this way. See Books: Reviews for the complete review.

Thomas P. Slaughter The Sewards of New York A Biography of a Leading American Political Family Cornell University Press, October 2025.

Thank you, NetGalley, for providing me with this uncorrected proof for review.

Thomas P. Slaughter has written an incredibly dense informative book about the Seward family. To assist in finding the various family members who appear in typically detailed and insightful accounts, a list of the main characters and a family tree for both the Sewards and the Millers are provided at the front of the book. Some of the stories about family members are intriguing, particularly when they are juxtaposed with alternative perspectives from other family members, or Slaughter’s almost intuitive asides. One such story is that of Henry Seward, and we are left wondering whether his actions are a justifiable rebellion at his father’s harsh parenting, or whether he was as shameful a character as some of the material suggests. It is this level of intrigue and alternative explanation that kept me reading, even though for me, at times the narrative lagged. Despite this and the density of the material, and its dependence on family narrative, with the political narrative taking a second place, I found it tempting to keep returning to read more. For the reader keen to garner new information about this political family and the times, rather than the academic studying the period, this is possibly the best, if not only way, to approach the material. I found it worthwhile doing so. See Books: Reviews for the complete review.

I was sent a kindle copy of this novel by Dervla McTiernan and BookFunnel. However, the only copy I can find for sale is this audible, reviewed on Good Reads. It seemed worthwhile posting my review here.

Dervla McTiernan, The Fireground, BookFunnel, 2025.

I found this novel a departure from Dervla McTiernan’s other work and took some time to appreciate it. However, I then read it in a night, as I became attached to the characters, and wanted to know how their lives developed from the damaging events with which the book begins. When I finished, I felt that I would like to know more about Flynn, Noah, and Kaiya – is there going to be a follow up, Dervla McTiernan?

Flynn and Kaiya are sisters, and must navigate their lives as school students, at risk from predatory relatives and juggling domestic, educational, and work priorities after their parents are killed in a car smash. Noah is an indifferent student, and his mother is a perpetual victim of his stepfather’s violence. Until this violence reaches a shocking conclusion, Noah’s father has been absent. See Books: Reviews for the complete review.

American Politics

November 5, 2025

Heather Cox Richardson from Letters from an American <heathercoxrichardson@substack.com> 

New York City mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani, a member of both the Democratic Party and the Democratic Socialists of America, began his victory speech last night with a nod to Eugene V. Debs, labor organizer and Socialist candidate for president at the turn of the last century.“

The sun may have set over our city this evening, but as Eugene Debs once said: ‘I can see the dawn of a better day for humanity.’”The 34-year-old mayor-elect’s speech went on to deliver something that was more than a victory speech. It marked a new era much like the one that had given rise to Debs himself. After more than forty years in which ordinary Americans had seen the political system being stacked against them and, over time, forgotten they had agency to change it, they had woken up.

Mamdani began by lifting up New York City’s working people, noting that “[f]or as long as we can remember,” they “have been told by the wealthy and the well-connected that power does not belong in their hands…. And yet,” he said, “over the last 12 months, you have dared to reach for something greater.”

“Tonight,” he said, “against all odds, we have grasped it. The future is in our hands.” New York, he said, had delivered “[a] mandate for change. ​​A mandate for a new kind of politics. A mandate for a city we can afford. And a mandate for a government that delivers exactly that.”

Mamdani thanked “the next generation of New Yorkers who refuse to accept that the promise of a better future was a relic of the past.” And that was the heart of his message: that democracy belongs to ordinary people. “We will fight for you,” he said, “because we are you.”

He thanked “Yemeni bodega owners and Mexican abuelas. Senegalese taxi drivers and Uzbek nurses. Trinidadian line cooks and Ethiopian aunties.” He assured “every New Yorker in Kensington and Midwood and Hunts Point” that “this city is your city, and this democracy is yours too.”

Mamdani celebrated the hard work of democracy in his win. It was a victory not just for all those who make up New York City, he said, but also for “the more than 100,000 volunteers who built this campaign into an unstoppable force…. With every door knocked, every petition signature earned, and every hard-earned conversation, you eroded the cynicism that has come to define our politics.”

With that base of Americans engaged in the work of democracy, Mamdani welcomed a new era. “There are many who thought this day would never come, who feared that we would be condemned only to a future of less, with every election consigning us simply to more of the same,” he said. “And there are others who see politics today as too cruel for the flame of hope to still burn.”

But in New York City last night, he said, “we have answered those fears…. Hope is alive. Hope is a decision that tens of thousands of New Yorkers made day after day, volunteer shift after volunteer shift, despite attack ad after attack ad. More than a million of us stood in our churches, in gymnasiums, in community centers, as we filled in the ledger of democracy.”

“And while we cast our ballots alone, we chose hope together. Hope over tyranny. Hope over big money and small ideas. Hope over despair. We won because New Yorkers allowed themselves to hope that the impossible could be made possible. And we won because we insisted that no longer would politics be something that is done to us. Now, it is something that we do.”

Mamdani promised a government that would answer to the demands of the people. It would address the city’s cost-of-living crisis, invest in education, improve infrastructure, and cut bureaucratic waste. It would, he said, work with police officers to reduce crime while also defending community safety and demanding excellence in government.

Mamdani pushed back not just against the smears thrown his way during the campaign, but also against the deliberate division of the country that has been a staple of Republican rhetoric since 1972, when President Richard Nixon’s vice president Spiro Agnew embraced his role as the key purveyor of “positive polarization.” In its place, he called for community and solidarity.

“In this new age we make for ourselves,” Mamdani said, “we will refuse to allow those who traffic in division and hate to pit us against one another…. Here, we believe in standing up for those we love, whether you are an immigrant, a member of the trans community, one of the many Black women that Donald Trump has fired from a federal job, a single mom still waiting for the cost of groceries to go down, or anyone else with their back against the wall. Your struggle is ours, too.”

Mamdani, who is Muslim, promised to “build a City Hall that stands steadfast alongside Jewish New Yorkers and does not waver in the fight against the scourge of antisemitism. Where the more than 1 million Muslims know that they belong—not just in the five boroughs of this city, but in the halls of power.”

He called for a government of both competence and compassion. “For years,” he said, “those in City Hall have only helped those who can help them. But on January first, we will usher in a city government that helps everyone.”

Mamdani took on the problem of disinformation in modern politics, noting that “many have heard our message only through the prism of misinformation. Tens of millions of dollars have been spent to redefine reality and to convince our neighbors that this new age is something that should frighten them.” He laid that disinformation at the feet of the very wealthy in their quest to divide working Americans to make sure they retain power. “[A]s so often occurred,” he said, “the billionaire class has sought to convince those making $30 an hour that their enemies are those earning $20 an hour. They want the people to fight amongst ourselves so that we remain distracted from the work of remaking a long-broken system.”

Mamdani urged New Yorkers to embrace a “brave new course, rather than fleeing from it.” If they do, he said, “we can respond to oligarchy and authoritarianism with the strength it fears, not the appeasement it craves.”

Mamdani identified the popular momentum to defeat President Donald J. Trump, but made the point that the goal is not simply to stop Trump, but also to stop the next Trump who comes along. While Mamdani’s prescription focused on the avenues of resistance open to New York City government, he emphasized that for the president “to get to any of us,” he will have to “get through all of us.”

Mamdani called for New Yorkers to “leave mediocrity in our past,” and for Democrats to “dare to be great.” When Mamdani said, “New York, this power, it’s yours,” and told New Yorkers, “[t]his city belongs to you,” millions of Americans heard a reminder that they, too, are powerful and that the government of the United States of America belongs to them.Mamdani won election yesterday backed by just over half the city’s voters, in an election characterized by extraordinarily high turnout. Andy Newman of the New York Times noted yesterday that in the last four New York City mayoral elections, fewer than a third of registered voters turned out. Yesterday, more than 2 million voters voted, the highest turnout for a mayoral election since 1969.And that turnout is a key part of the story of yesterday’s Democratic wave. As Mamdani said, American voters appear, once again, to be aware of their agency in our democracy.—

Notes: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/nov/05/zohran-mamdani-victory-speech-transcripthttps://www.thecity.nyc/2025/11/04/record-voters-ballots-cast-mamdani-cuomo-sliwa/https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/04/nyregion/nyc-mayor-election-turnout.html


Abigail Spanberger’s speech*

Brandon Jarvis

Nov 05, 2025

Gov.-elect Abigail Spanberger


Thank you. Thank you. Thank you all so much.

My fellow Virginians. Tonight, we sent a message — we sent a message to every corner of the Commonwealth; a message to our neighbors and our fellow Americans across the country; we sent a message to the whole world — that in 2025, Virginia chose pragmatism over partisanship. We chose our Commonwealth over chaos.

You all chose leadership that will focus relentlessly on what matters most: lowering costs, keeping our communities safe, and strengthening our economy for every Virginian — leadership that will focus on problem solving, not stoking division.

You chose leadership that will always put Virginia first. And Virginia, I cannot wait to get to work for you.

Tonight, we turned a page. We turned that page by listening to our neighbors, focusing on practical results, laying out a clear agenda, and leading with decency and determination.

To everyone who helped us achieve this win — from the bottom of my heart — I thank you for the trust you have placed in me and it is the honor of my lifetime to be elected the 75th Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia!

I would like to thank my opponent for a hard fought race.

The Lieutenant Governor’s story, her military service, and her years of service to Virginia — deserve our respect. I ask you join me in wishing her and her family well.

I also know that her supporters are disappointed today — and to those Virginians who did not vote for me — I want you to know that my goal and intent is to serve all Virginians and that means I will listen to you. I will work for and with you. That is the approach I’ve taken throughout my whole career. I have worked with anyone and everyone — regardless of political party — to deliver results for the people that I serve.

That’s because I believe in this idea: that there is so much more that unites us as Virginians and as Americans than divides us. I know in my heart that we can unite for Virginia’s future and we can set an example for the rest of the nation.

Our founders understood this from the very beginning. They didn’t choose to call Virginia a “Commonwealth” by accident. They chose it to signify that our government would be based on the power of the people united for a common good. Not for a political party. Not for a President. Not for a monarch. But for a common good. Together.

And tonight, Virginia proved that tradition is alive and well. We are still a Commonwealth in every sense of the word. We are built on the things we share, not the things that pull us apart, and I’m proud that our campaign earned votes from Democrats, Republicans, Independents, and everyone in-between.

That’s the Virginia I know. That’s the Virginia I love. And that’s the Virginia I will have the honor of serving as your next Governor.

I want to thank so many people for the support they’ve given to our campaign. Thank you for your work.

Thank you to our tireless volunteers — to those who have believed in me — thank you for devoting your time your energy, your conviction to this campaign. Thank you for braving the heat, then the cold, then the rain, then the sun. Thank you.

Thank you for talking to your neighbors about the importance of this race. Thank you for recognizing that when we went person to person engaging, we could bring people not just into supporting our campaign, but engaging in our democracy.

We won this race because of you.

To our campaign team — you are the best team in the country. Every single one of you worked tirelessly for the change, the progress, the policies, the connection, and the respect that you want to see in our communities.

Thank you for working so hard. Thank you for giving people hope. Thank you for knocking doors in the sweltering heat. Thank you for showing kindness. Thank you for showing up in every corner of Virginia. Thank you for diving deep on policy. Thank you for capturing moments and the essence of our campaign. Thank you for reaching voters everywhere, and thank you for believing that Virginia could and would send a hopeful and joyful message.

Thank you for giving everything, everything to this campaign — and then some.

And thank you to my family [husband, daughters, sisters]… friends…

I’ve talked a lot throughout this campaign about the importance of service and how it’s shaped my life and my approach to public office. That all came from my parents.

But this commitment to service isn’t unique to my family — it’s engrained in so many Virginia families. It’s part of Virginia’s story.

Here, in Virginia, this is where American democracy was born, and where we’re still working to perfect it today.

Where James Madison built the framework for our Constitution to protect us from tyranny.

Where Washington and Jefferson fought to establish a government of, by, and for the people.

It’s also where Barbara Johns — a 16-year-old student from Farmville — led a walkout of students that would be part of the Brown v. Board of Education case to integrate public schools.

Barbara Johns never gave up and she showed us that no matter your age you can be part of the change and progress that you want to see here in Virginia and across the nation.

We were a nation founded on ideas — but we are a country where it is up to us — the citizens — who must put those ideas into action. It is us — the citizens who work to make change and progress — and built upon the foundation laid out over so many years. Now, Virginia, it is our time to lead…

It is a big deal that the girls and young women I have met along the campaign trail now know with certainty that they can achieve anything. It is a big deal to the woman older than I am — who forged the path in dreams, hard work, and belief that change and progress would be possible so many of us could follow in your footsteps — in any career, any role, any challenge.

The history Virginia is making tonight is yours — and I thank those who have come before me — and Mary Sue Terry in particular. She was the first woman elected statewide in Virginia, and because of her and the continued work of so many, there will be many more women to come for generations to come.

So, now that the campaign is over — the real work begins.

Because this was never just about winning an election. It was about what comes next. It is about the governing.

Virginia voters made their choice tonight. And that choice was loud and clear:

We’re going to lower the cost of renting, buying, or staying in your home. We are going to cut red tape and build homes families can actually afford.

We’re going to lower healthcare costs. We are going to crack down on predatory pharmaceutical practices and surprise billing.

We’re going produce more energy and we’re going to lower energy costs. We are going to produce more energy here in Virginia and make sure that data centers pay their fair share.

We’re going to grow Virginia’s economy by investing in the apprenticeships and job training of the future. We are going to leverage AI and cutting-edge manufacturing to bring more capital investment into our Commonwealth.

We’re going to take politics out of our schools. We are going to make sure that teachers are well paid and well respected, so that our students can focus on actually learning and so parents know that their child will succeed.

And we’re going to make our communities safer, by providing the training, pay, and support that our law enforcement community needs and deserves.

These aren’t slogans on a bumper sticker. They are actionable policies I’m ready to implement on day one. And starting now, that work begins.

So as we begin this transition to a new administration, I want to be absolutely clear about a couple of things:

First: Virginia is the only state in the South that hasn’t restricted women’s reproductive rights since the Dobbs decision. And under my watch, it will stay that way.

In Virginia, healthcare decisions about contraception, fertility treatments, and reproductive care will continue to be made between women and their doctors — not by politicians. That’s a promise I’ve made, and it’s a promise I intend to keep.

Second: I will always stand up for Virginia workers. Always.

Right now, our federal workforce is under attack. And the chaos coming out of Washington is killing Virginia jobs and creating economic uncertainty for tens of thousands of families, government employees, government contractors, small business owners who are impacted by the chaos coming out of Washington.

Virginia’s economy doesn’t work when Washington treats our workers, Virginia workers as expendable.

To those who have been impacted by the mass layoffs, please know that I will direct the full power of the Governor’s Office to support you.

And to those across the Potomac who are attacking our jobs and our economy: I will not stand by silently while you attack Virginia workers. I will fight every single day for every single Virginia job. The ones we have now and the ones we will have in the future. I will stand up to you — and to anyone who tries to harm our economy and the livelihoods of our Virginians.

As Governor, my job is to put Virginia first. Full stop.

And tonight, as the Governor-elect, I call on Congress — Republicans and Democrats — and our President to make real progress on bringing this shutdown to an end. The Virginians, the Americans who work tirelessly for their fellow citizens deserve nothing less.

I know we’re living in a time filled with chaos. We live in a time marked by uncertainty. And along the way, we do our best to try to explain it to our kids.

I know that the list of challenges we are facing is long. But I also know that the only way we’re going to solve these problems is by tackling them together.

Democrats, Republicans, Independents — all of us.

Because that embodies the message we sent tonight. That is what being a Commonwealth is all about: standing united for our future.

That is what Virginia is about!

Let’s show the world what we’re made of. Let’s get to work!

Thank you all very much.

Follow up to the recent USA elections from special correspondent Joanne Clark

Joanne’s information is valuable to people interested in American politics but are only able to source news highlights. Joanne says: “There were 465 (or thereabouts) elections across the country on Tuesday, and the Republicans won………..eleven percent! ” Further, School boards have been shedding their MAGA members in favor of Democrats, with Virginia’s change in 2024 making a positive change for schools there.

The Washington Post

Democrats swept elections far beyond the big races in referendum on Trump

By Naftali Bendavid

From clerks to coroners, Democrats on Tuesday flipped city councils, school boards and county commissions.

In Pennsylvania’s Bucks County, voters elected a Democratic district attorney for the first time since the 1800s, part of a Democratic sweep of every county office, including controller and recorder of deeds.

In Georgia, Democrats ousted two Republicans on the Public Service Commission, the party’s first capture of a nonfederal statewide office in Georgia since 2006. In Connecticut, Democrats took control of 28 towns from the GOP. In New Jersey, Democrats won their biggest majority in the General Assembly since the Watergate era. See Further Commentary and Articles arising from Books* and continued longer articles as noted in the blog. for the detailed article.


Nancy Pelosi Retires As The Most Important Woman In US Political History

Nancy Pelosi was a role model for what a Speaker of the House should be. As she announces her retirement, let’s honor the most important woman in US political history.

Jason Easley

Nov 07, 2025

It could be argued that Nancy Pelosi is the most important political figure in the United States over the last 40 years. Throughout presidential administrations, Pelosi has navigated key legislation and led critical fights for the American people in the House.

During the Clinton administration, she championed the Ryan White Care Act that expanded Medicaid to cover HIV/AIDS care and established the national care system for HIV and AIDS. Pelosi was vital to changing the way that HIV is cared for and the she changes she brought about through legislation saved lives.

During the Bush administration, she led the opposition to the Iraq War. The national oppostion to the Iraq War led to a blue wave in 2006 that led to Pelosi making history as the first woman Speaker of the House in 2007.

During her first stint as speaker, Pelosi got the response to the Great Recession through the House that included saving the US auto industry.

Pelosi’s greatest and most important achievement legislatively as speaker was the years-long effort to pass the Affordable Care Act. Americans often forget how intense of a battle it was to get the healthcare legislation through the House. It ended up costing Pelosi her first speakership, but she got legislation passed that would improve and forever change the US healthcare system.

Pelosi became the first person in more than six decades to return as speaker in 2019. Her second term as speaker was defined by passing the American Rescue Plan to respond to the COVID pandemic, and House passage of the most consequential infrastructure legislation in forty years.

Nancy Pelosi kept House Democrats unified and together. Younger House Democrats complained that she ruled the Democratic caucus with an iron fist and the opportunities were limited. but her influence can be seen all over the next generation of House Democrats, from Hakeem Jeffries to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

Rep. Pelosi has remained an advisor to House Democrats even after stepping down from leadership. *

*The remainder of this article is available on the Politicususa substack – eventually I might manage to get this! However, the above is an indication of the valuable contribution Nancy Pelosi has made to USA political life, and the way in which Politicususa acknowledges this.

John Stoehr

John Stoehr is the editor and publisher of the Editorial Board. Find him @johnastoehr.

Voters are acting like they were scammed — they should know Trump wasn’t alone

November 7, 2025 8:39AM ET

  1. It’s a good thing when the Democrats win. There are some who would have you believe the opposite is true. As the New York Times Pitchbot said: “Zohran Mamdani won. So why does it feel like he lost.” He didn’t lose. Neither did statewide Democratic candidates in Virginia, Georgia and New Jersey. Neither did Democrats in towns and cities across America. It was a blue wave that suggests more blue waves to come. Democrats won by unexpected margins and in unexpected places (eg, Bristol, Connecticut). That’s good. Don’t let anyone tell you otherwise.
  2. Those who would have us doubt the goodness of electoral victory are typically invested in the idea that there are deep, perhaps irreconcilable, differences between Democratic factions. Though the Republicans got shellacked, they are not being asked to rethink their futureAxios reported that it’s the Democrats who must settle a “civil war over the best way to move forward after its crushing losses in 2024.” Do they choose to moderate Democrats or “leftwing” Democrats? It sounds reasonable. It might even sound noble. It’s not. It’s phony.
  1. Zohran Mamdani, the mayor-elect of New York, and Abigail Spanberger, the governor-elect of Virginia, are very different Democrats who certainly disagree on policy. That is not a weakness. It’s the strength found in a multi-racial ideologically heterodox organization like the Democrats. Each candidate amassed winning coalitions according to the conditions of their constituencies. That’s all they were thinking about. That’s all any of the winners was thinking about. No one was thinking about whether they speak for the entire Democratic Party in its fight against Donald Trump. That Axios is pretending otherwise is why its reporting about “civil war” is actually concern-trolling.
  2. I would guess, if left to their own devices, a moderate like Spanberger and a progressive like Mamdani could work things out if given sufficient motivation. I think the problem comes when Democratic leaders stop listening to each other and start privileging the perspectives of people who do not have the interests of their party, or those of the people they represent, foremost in their minds. By that, I mean a Washington press corps that has internalized the idea that the Republicans are the only legitimate leaders as well as the idea that the Democrats, even after they win, must seek the Republicans’ consent before using the power they have legitimately earned.
  3. Some centrist Democrats confuse compromise with consent. This prevents them from using the power they have to solve problems that they have told voters they would solve. That, in turn, makes them look weak in comparison to Republicans, who never seek the consent of the Democrats, which in turn, triggers a crisis of faith. Donald Trump has created conditions in which fighters ranging from Mamdani to Spanberger are trusted while middle-of-the-road centrists who can’t decide whether to join the fight open themselves up to contempt from both sides.
  4. Some centrists, and perhaps some progressives, believe they will benefit from a backlash. They will interpret last night’s results as what political scientists call “thermostatic politics” (think: pendulum swing). But the intensity of the blue wave suggests something else. Many voters seem to be reacting as if they were scammed. Every single county in Virginia shifted left, even the whitest, western-most ones. In New Jersey, the Democratic candidate wiped out gains Trump made with Black and Hispanic voters. G Elliott Morris said the best explanation is “that voters didn’t know what they were getting with Trump 2.0 last November, but now they do — and they don’t like it.” But they didn’t know because our media has been so thoroughly corrupted. It sold them vibes. What they got was fascism.
    Pollster Tom Bonier put it this way: “None of this is complicated. The GOP ran on affordability in 2024. They gave sanctimonious lectures on cable news on election night about how ‘the silent working class majority’ had spoken. Then they governed as reckless authoritarians, punishing the working class.”
    But it is complicated. If voters really are punishing the Republicans for breaking their promise, they would have wanted to know that Joe Biden presided over the world’s greatest recovery from the covid. Wages were up, debts were down, employment was rarely higher. They would have wanted to know the cost of food and energy was getting back to normal. (Perhaps they would have wanted to know more about Kamala Harris’ plan to prosecute price-gouging.) They would have wanted to know, but didn’t, because they could not hear over the din of Trump’s lies or the media’s obsession with a recession that never came (not to mention reporters making fetish of Joe Biden’s age). If voters are acting like they were scammed, they should know Trump wasn’t alone. The media scammed them, too. And the Democrats should never play nice with scammers.
    If what we are seeing were normal “thermostatic politics,” we could expect Trump to modulate. He won’t. He’s going to break more laws, steal more power, take more bribes and keep grinding the working class to dust. His party won’t back off, either, not when it can cheat. (“We have a very favorable election map on the Republican side,” Mike Johnson said today, “And it will be more favorable when all the redistricting stuff is done.”) Voters held Trump and the Republicans accountable last night but they are now pretending voters did no such thing. And as they have since Trump came on the scene, reporters are going to play along. That’s why it’s the Democrats, not the Republicans, who must rethink their future. Failure isn’t a problem for the GOP, but victory is for the Democrats.

Rebecca – Melbourne Theatre Company

Before the show we ate in the very attractive precinct around the theatre – an easy tram ride from the centre.

I, unlike the critics and everyone on Facebook, found the production disappointing. The new Mrs. de Winter was dressed in the dreary pale blue cardigan and frock one might expect. However, little sandals and socks? Too much naivety, in my view. Her passion for Maxim, at least in her imagination, was, to be fair, wonderfully at odds with this image. Pamela Rabe, as Mrs. Danvers was excellent. She downplayed her antagonism beautifully – such a splendidly subtle approach which contrasted with the almost comedy act of Rebecca’s cousin. The comedy was misplaced, and, with the choppiness of the first half of the play, added to my disappointment. Mrs. Danver’s and Mrs. de Winter’s interaction in the second half of the play saved it, and I could sincerely join the clapping at the end. The disappointing life led by the couple after Mrs. de Winter becomes complicit in Maxim’s crime was a sensitive start to the production, and I wish the values expressed there had been visible throughout the production.

The Conversation

Article republished here under Creative Commons License.

Why Jim Henson should be recognised as one of the foremost creators of fairytales on screen

Published: November 7, 2025 12.53am AEDT

In March 1955, an 18-year-old Jim Henson built a puppet from his mother’s old coat, a pair of blue jeans and some ping pong balls. The lizard-like creation first appeared on Afternoon, a television series on Washington D.C.’s WRC-TV, but became a regular on the five-minute Sam and Friends puppet sketch comedy show from May 1955. Over 70 years, the creature evolved into Kermit. The bright green frog now is a cultural icon.

To mark 70 years of The Jim Henson Company, the company has curated an auction of official memorabilia, including puppets, props, costumes and artwork. In a specially-recorded promotional video, Brian Henson, Jim’s son, provides a useful reminder that his father’s legacy is far greater than The Muppets.

Indeed, Henson made a significant contribution to the screen fairytale, a genre all too often dominated by Disney. To encourage fans and viewers to think beyond The Muppet Show and Disney, I offer a reappraisal of his career in my book The Fairy Tales of Jim Henson: Keeping the Best Place by the Fire.

By far the biggest section of the auction is made of items created for the productions and publicity from The Dark Crystal (1982) and the revival Netflix series The Dark Crystal: Age of Resistance (2019). The original fantasy evolved from an idea Henson had to create a story around an anthropomorphised reptilian race, which eventually became the formidable Skeksis.

His collaboration with the British artist Brian Froud led to the evolution of the intricate world of The Dark Crystal. The film follows Jen (voiced by Stephen Garlick), a delicate, fey-like creature from the nearly-extinct Gelfling race. Jen embarks on a quest to save the planet Thra by healing the Dark Crystal. He must complete his mission before the “great conjunction”, an event that would give the evil Skeksis power over the fragile world forever.

This ambitious endeavour was not the first time that Henson had used a fairytale-inspired story or aesthetic. As early as 1958, following a trip to Europe, he began to develop a version of Hansel and Gretel. Although it remained unfinished, fairytales became an established strand in Henson’s work.

This included two unaired pilots called The Tales of the Tinkerdee (1962) and The Land of Tinkerdee (1964), as well as the three television specials that make up Tales from Muppetland (1969-72). The latter are playful, gentle parodies and a Muppetisation of the well-known stories Cinderella, The Frog Prince and The Bremen Town Musicians.


Fairytales even inspired two of Henson’s mid-1960s commercials for The Compax Corporation’s Pak-Nit and Pak-Nit RX – preshrunk fabrics used to make leisurewear. The ads were titled Shrinkel and Stretchel and Rumple Wrinkle Shrinkel Stretchelstiltzkin. Fairytale themes also appeared from time to time in segments of Sesame Street (1969-present) and The Muppet Show (1976–81).

Henson’s film Labyrinth (1986) is a beguiling blend of well-known coming of age fairy stories, most overtly Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland (1865) and The Wonderful Wizard of Oz (1900). These references are combined with original and innovative puppetry and design, and, of course, David Bowie as the charismatic Goblin King.

One of Henson’s final projects was the imaginative and technically inventive television series Jim Henson’s The Storyteller (1987-89). Inspired by her folklore studies at Harvard University, Lisa Henson encouraged her father to develop a show based on the rich European folk tale tradition, importantly, one that avoided the best-known tales, in favour of more the more unusual and challenging.

Fairytales are an important – and often overlooked – part of Henson’s legacy, from the final productions made during his lifetime to The Jim Henson Company’s later output (for example, Jim Henson’s Jack and the Beanstalk: The Real Story in 2001 and The Dark Crystal: Age of Resistance). Fans are also consistently teased with rumours of a Labyrinth sequel or reboot. Most recently, Robert Eggers is reported to be directing.

Henson should be considered one of the foremost creators of screen fairytales of the 20th century. As his fans celebrate the 70th anniversary of his creations, it’s time for the world to rediscover his magical body of work, beyond the much-beloved Muppets.

This article features references to books that have been included for editorial reasons, and may contain links to bookshop.org. If you click on one of the links and go on to buy something from bookshop.org The Conversation UK may earn a commission.


I find the Agatha Christie Newsletter a bit of fun – excerpts below

January Netflix Release | Christmas Shop | Activities

The Agatha Christie Newsletter <generalenquiries@agathachristie.com

The new series starring Mia McKenna-Bruce, Helena Bonham Carter and Martin Freeman debuts 15 January worldwide. Along with the release date, Netflix have also shared first look images and a thrilling new teaser. Read more


Explore our November Read Christie pick
Cat Among the Pigeons blends murder mystery with international espionage, making it an ideal fit for our November spies theme. When a teacher is found dead in a prestigious school, suspicion spreads and Poirot is called on. Find out more

“What is three quarters of a million or some such sum in comparison with human life?” Agatha Christie, Cat Among the Pigeons

 
The After School Detectives Club is now out in the US, and to celebrate we’ve shared a few printable pages from the book. It’s the perfect autumn activity for children aged 8+. Is your child as perceptive as Poirot? Download the PDFTrial our courtroom-themed word search


Last week marked 72 years since Witness for the Prosecution first opened on the stage in London, and to celebrate we created a new word search! Can you find all the hidden words and phrases related to the play? Test your skills

The World of Agatha Christie
Read about all things Christie in the tenth edition of our free magazine, packed full of puzzles, extracts and trivia for fans to enjoy. In this edition, we’re focusing on spies, lawyers and more in Christie’s stories. Download your PDF copy

Stories featuring spies “Bundle” Brent uncovers a secret society that could help solve a murder involving a missing clock. Read more

A wounded spy enters Victoria Jones’s hotel room in Baghdad and utters his final words… Read more

The young, bereaved Hilary is persuaded by a secret agent to undertake a risky mission. Read more


© 2025 Agatha Christie Ltd, All rights reserved.

Our mailing address is: Agatha Christie Ltd
Imperial House
8 Kean Street
London, WC2B 4AS
United Kingdom

Week beginning 5 November 2025

Victoria Scott The House on the Cliff Boldwood Books, October 2025.

Thank you, Boldwood Books and NetGalley for providing me with this uncorrected proof for review.

The House on the Cliff is the fourth of Victoria Scott’s novels that I have enjoyed. However, although there is much to admire, I felt a little disappointed. The pacing was slow at times; the writing would have benefitted from being sharper and more focussed. Also, although I was impressed with Scott’s exploration of the nature of perimenstrual impact on women and their relationships, this was a little overworked. The positive feature of the way in which Scott dealt with this issue was that the difficulties were validated, and their influence on the present-day main character’s relationships did not dismiss the real challenges she faced and had to reconcile with her marriage, her changing responsibilities and even the seemingly simple task of leaving a familiar environment for an new future. See Books: Reviews for the complete review.

Roxanne Gregory, A History of Women in Piracy Life under the Black Flag, Pen & Sword| Pen & Sword History, August 2025.

Thank you, NetGalley and Pen & Sword, for providing me with this uncorrected proof for review.

There remains a role for writing women into history despite the numerous works that have undertaken this task so admirably. Roxanne Gregory has assembled short pieces about women who were pirates, restoring them as actors in what has been largely seen as men’s history. Female pirates have appeared in fiction, and they and their male counterparts have provided dynamic narratives in which their escapades are often romanticised. With such a background, Gregory has a difficult job in providing a true picture of the women she chooses to portray, while maintaining some of liveliness that readers have been led to expect from the fictional accounts of piracy. See Books: Reviews for the complete review.

Claire Allan People Don’t Just Disappear Boldwood Books, November 2025.

Thank you, Net Galley and Boldwood Books, for this uncorrected proof for review.

Initially, this appears to be a harrowing story of abduction and cruelty, with a somewhat weak premise. A prologue introduces a man reacting strongly to wailing and lamenting to which he feels unjustly subjected. After all, as he tells a child playing with his toys, none of this is his fault, the woman knows the rules and if she had obeyed, she would not have been punished – he is fair. Like those before her, it is she who lets him down, her punishment is her fault, not his. In chapter 1, a small boy appears at Bronagh’s front door, crying and enticing her to accompany him to where she finds a barely alive woman in an abandoned car. She appears to be the victim of an accident, until Bronagh is hit on the head, and much later awakes in a dirty, cold bedroom. Here she is variously tormented by her captor, the cries of the child who claims that she is his mother, and another woman who is fearful, but possibly part of the kidnapping. See Books: Reviews for the complete review.

Cindy Lou has several breakfasts,brunches, and some tapas at Degraves Espresso in Degraves Lane, Melbourne

Degraves Espresso was a terrific find. We stopped for tapas soon after our arrival – and returned for breakfasts and brunches. The tapas menu is excellent, and we chose our favorites from the experience of eating at La Tasca, a wonderful chain in London that unfortunately has closed – prawns and sour dough, patatas bravas, slow roasted leeks and albondigas (see previous post for photos). The staff at Degraves Espresso is friendly and the meals generous, delicious and interesting. The coffee is good. We shall be pleased to return on our next Melbourne trip.

Cindy Lou eats in a posher lane

This was not as positive experience as Degraves Espresso. Although the cafe was attractive and the coffee served in large cups was good, the salads were overpriced and ordinary. The prosciutto was supposed to be served with figs – a lovely combination- but they were replaced with strawberries (with no explanation or apology) – and although the salmon was pleasant enough the whole meal was not particularly stunning.

Cindy Lou eats at D.O.C. Lygon Street

The environment was terrific, and the food plentiful and flavoursome. However, the silky pasta that I experienced years ago at a meal in Bagni di Lucca seems to be unavailable in Australia even in restaurants with a splendid pasta reputation.

Bar Idda with family

Bar Idda is a Sicilian restaurant which was extremely successful the last time we visited. They were so accommodating, managing to fit eleven people reasonably comfortably around a table made for a smaller number. On this occasion we had the same table for a smaller number, and would have preferred something smaller so that we could talk and hear comfortably over the loud music. My recall was a meal that I could not resist trying again. I found some of the food excellent, and lamb eaters were very enthusiastic about the lamb. On Fridays and Saturdays only the chef’s menu is available, and there is little information before the dishes arrive. The attention to special meals, such as gluten free and vegetarian was amazing. So, a good night, with wonderful staff and pleasant enough food. Less noise and more information about the menu would have been an improvement.

I can see by the photos I must have enjoyed it more than I thought!! Empty plates everywhere.

National Gallery of Victoria

This gallery is always worth a visit. On this occasion I took only a few photos, and they do not do the gallery justice. I enjoyed the time looking instead as my phone needed charging. I chose the Christian Dior exhibition, and a display of chairs instead of the usual paintings I feature in this blog.

American Politics

Good results for Democrats in races for Governor, Lt. Governor and Attorney General in Virginia, New Jersey, and New York. The referendum in California (see article below) which also took place was a win for Democrats.

This whole referendum in California is kind of complicated. Here’s what residents are voting on

Story by Arit John, CNN

One of the most consequential elections this year isn’t between a Democratic and Republican candidate, but over a ballot initiative in California.

Proposition 50 would allow California Democrats to replace the state’s congressional maps with ones the party hopes will help them to flip five GOP-held seats.

Democrats launched their redistricting push, led by California Gov. Gavin Newsom, after Texas Republicans redrew their maps to create five new seats that will favor the GOP at the behest of President Donald Trump.

Newsom has made himself the face of the effort, investing his own political capital into his party’s efforts to win back control of the US House next year.

But while Texas Republicans were able to pass new maps through the legislative process, California Democrats had to first seek voter approval. That’s because Californians amended their state Constitution in 2010 to give an independent redistricting commission the power to set congressional lines.Expand article logo  Continue reading

Proposition 50 would give lawmakers the right to temporarily override that map through the 2030 election, after which the commission would draw the next decade’s maps.

Supporters of the measure have argued it will level the playing field ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, when Democrats hope to retake control of the US House, and serve as a check on the Trump administration. If passed, it would help Democrats neutralize much of the advantage Republicans have gained after redrawing congressional maps in Texas, Missouri, Ohio and North Carolina.

“The essence of Prop 50 is to say that if you are going to play that game, then we are going to try to counteract that abuse of the system,” said former President Barack Obama, who has thrown his support behind getting the measure approved, during a virtual event with Newsom last month.

Critics, however, say Proposition 50 would undermine the nationwide effort to promote nonpartisan redistricting, and they have said Democrats may be reluctant to relinquish the power to draw the congressional map in the next decade and cede seats back to Republicans. Several Democrats have already announced their plans to challenge incumbent Republicans in the proposed new districts.

“There’s this war going on all over the United States. Who can out cheat the other one?” former Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who served from 2003 to 2011, told CNN’s Jake Tapper in October. “Texas started it. They did something terribly wrong. And then all of a sudden California says, ‘Well, then we have to do something terribly wrong.’ And then now other states are jumping in.”

Newsom and other Democrats backing the measure have stressed that Proposition 50 reaffirms the state’s general support for independent redistricting, despite the current attempt to gerrymander the state.

British Politics

Labour Rosette

It is an honour to introduce this edition of The Labour Rosette in recognition of Black History Month. Last month, we paid tribute to the contribution of our Black community in this country, both in our past and in our future.

If one moment has come to symbolise that story, it is the arrival of the Empire Windrush in 1948. The Windrush generation, who came on that ship and others thereafter, left the Caribbean for Britain. Here, they helped a Labour Government build a New Jerusalem from the ashes of the Second World War. When we needed them, they were there for us.

Many years later, after decades contributing to this country, the last Conservative Government had the chance to stand by them. Instead, they abandoned them. People who had given so much to our country, over so many years, were treated as illegal immigrants in their own home. The Windrush scandal will forever be a stain on our history, and on the legacy of the last Conservative Government.

For those affected, the delays, the uncertainty, and the injustice have caused immense pain. Now, I am determined to put things right – and not just with words, but through action.

We have re-established a dedicated Windrush Unit in the Home Office to ensure support reaches those who need it most. We have also now launched a £1.5 million advocacy fund, to ensure the voices of those affected are always heard.

Crucially, we are paying compensation to those affected. In the last few weeks, I announced that Windrush victims can now receive most of their compensation upfront. Elderly and vulnerable claimants will be prioritised for rapid support. We are also extending the scheme to cover lost pension contributions, for those who had to withdraw their savings to fund their quest to prove their lawful immigration status.

The harm that was done to the Windrush generation can never be fully undone. But we can and must do everything in our power to right this historic wrong. That is what this Labour Government is doing. That is the difference a Labour government makes.

In contrast, Reform is now threatening to pursue the path of the Windrush scandal all over again. Their divisive plans to strip people of their settled status – which allows them to live in this country for good – is a gross betrayal of who we are in this country. It would tear families apart, separating children from their parents. It would do untold harm to our public services, not least the NHS. And it would cause untold damage to our communities. It is the action of those who seek a littler England, not a greater Britain.

Labour will always fight for those who have been left behind. We will always deliver justice where it has been denied.

In this edition of The Labour Rosette, you will read more about the work Labour is doing to fight for national renewal and build a Britain for all. I am proud to play my part in that effort as your Home Secretary. 

Thank you,

Shabana Mahmood
Secretary of State for the Home Department 

Fairer future for renters with Labour’s Renters’ Rights Act

Labour’s historic Renters’ Rights Act has received Royal Assent meaning it is now law, securing a fairer future for 11 million private renters in England. In the coming weeks, Labour Ministers will outline how these reforms will be rolled out.

The landmark legislation will abolish Section 21 ‘no fault’ evictions and rebalance landlord-tenant relations across England as part of the Government’s Plan for Change.  

What does this mean?

  • This Act abolishes Section 21 ‘no fault’ evictions – a practice that has pushed thousands into homelessness.
  • Tenants will also be able to challenge unfair rent increases and ask to keep a pet – something landlords can’t say no to without a good reason.
  • The Renters’ Rights Act will also tackle discrimination head-on, banning landlords and agents from refusing tenants because they have children or receive benefits and bringing the Decent Homes Standard and Awaab’s Law into the private rented sector for the first time.  

Why this matters:

  • The Renters’ Rights Act delivers on Labour’s manifesto commitment to level the playing field between landlords and tenants.  
  • The Conservatives did nothing to protect England’s renters during their 14 years in office, and they voted against the Renters’ Rights Act in Parliament. Nigel Farage’s Reform Party also voted against Labour’s measures to protect renters. Only Labour is on the side of working people. 

Prime Minister Keir Starmer said: 

“Every family deserves the dignity of a safe and secure home.

“For too long, millions of renters have lived at the mercy of rogue landlords or insecure contracts, with their futures hanging in the balance. We’re putting an end to that.

“A secure home isn’t just bricks and mortar – it’s the foundation for opportunity, safety, and a better life. No child should grow up without one.” 

Australian politics

From Women and literature

7 Novels That Explore Motherhood’s Complexities – Donna Frietas

In the opening pages of The Paper Palace, the protagonist has a thought that made me want to throw the book across the room, not to mention scream bloody murder: “The best lesson my mother ever taught me: there are two things in life you never regret—a baby and a swim.”

It’s tossed out as though it’s a given for everyone—and I suppose to many people, it is. But for me? That single sentence pushed hard into the deepest button I’ve got. It prompted me to stop reading the book. I couldn’t bear it. Throwaway statements (and beliefs) like these assumed to be universally true for women are what steal a woman’s real feelings from her own mouth, and forbid her from speaking them out loud. (My emphasis).

I knew from the time I was very young that I didn’t want children. Yet once I reached my 30s everyone was pushing me to ignore my gut and have a baby anyway. The cacophony of voices arguing that if I didn’t overcome my resistance I’d eventually regret the decision for the rest of my life was relentless. Ruthless even. Yet not a single person worried about the other possible outcome: that if I ignored my gut and became a mother, I might regret having had the baby.

Beliefs like these and the way I was hounded are what compelled me to write The Nine Lives of Rose Napolitano about a woman who doesn’t want children, whose marriage has come to rest on whether she’ll change her mind.

They’re also behind my forthcoming thriller, Her One Regret, about a woman (Lucy) who vanishes from a parking lot, leaving her baby behind in a shopping cart—everyone assumes she was taken. We soon learn that maybe Lucy wasn’t kidnapped after all—that maybe she planned her own disappearance because she regrets becoming a mother.

Her One Regret hinges on that question: Was Lucy taken or did she run?

I’ve come to think of Her One Regret as “The 10th Rose.”

In The Nine Lives readers see Rose’s life twist and turn depending on whether she has a child even though she doesn’t want one, or whether she stands her ground and doesn’t become a mother. But the version of Rose I was too afraid to write was the one based on my own greatest fear: the Rose where she has the baby and then regrets it.

To be frank, I thought if I wrote that Rose, the novel would not get published, because openly discussing motherhood regret is still so taboo. Yet after many emails from readers who wanted to know why I hadn’t given them a Rose who regrets—I finally decided to write that story. It emerged as a crime and suspense novel, Her One Regret, that turns on Lucy Mendoza’s disappearance.

Times have changed even in the last few years, and we are having many more complicated conversations about being a mother, and about choosing not to become a mother, and even (yes, at least a little) about regretting having children. But we still have a long way to go. Here are seven of my favorite books/series that offer portraits of very complicated motherhood.

Begoña Gómez Urzaiz, The Abandoners

Ashley Audrain, The Push

Lionel Shriver, We Need to Talk About Kevin

Rachel Yoder, Nightbitch

Elena Ferrante, The Neapolitan Quartet

Doris Lessing, The Fifth Child

Week beginning 29 October 2025

Lona Bailey Wicked Witch of the West The Enduring Legacy of a Feminist Icon Bloomsbury Academic, October 2025.

Thank you, NetGalley and Bloomsbury Academic for providing me with this uncorrected proof for review.

Lona Bailey has produced a tremendously readable account of the feminist underpinnings of the wicked witch of the west, and more. This is not to suggest that the book is not an academic exercise; it has all the accoutrements of academic work – citations, an index, a bibliography, and of course is based on an immense amount of research. Where enthusiasm for a topic meets academic excellence and engaging writing, a reader is fortunate. I felt more than fortunate when reading Wicked Witch of the West The Enduring Legacy of a Feminist Icon. Bailey combines such academic excellence and engaging writing around a topic that has been an enduring interest. Popular culture, feminism, the Wicked Witch of the West in her various manifestations, from The Wizard of Oz to the musical, Wicked, further novels and television programs are gathered to produce an engrossing study. I read the book over a day and, happily woke during the night to continue to the end. This is a thoroughly enthralling read.

Bailey begins with Frank Baum’s novel, The Wonderful Wizard of Oz, in which the wicked witch is not the green visaged apparition of the film fame. This is a particularly illuminating chapter, with its reflections on why villains may be appealing, and the powerful aspects of the wicked witch of the west. Baum’s witch becomes the source of analysis of the feminist aspects of the witch, the appearance of the original, the actor who played her years later and the changes to her appearance that took place, as well as events on the set of The Wizard of Oz. The latter is very illuminating indeed.  So, too is the discussion of Baum’s background and speculation on his intentions on developing this character. See Books: Reviews for the complete review.

Edward Biddulph, The James Bond Lover’s Guide to Britain, Pen & Sword | White Owl, October 2025.

Thank you, NetGalley and Pen & Sword, for providing me with this uncorrected proof for review.

Guides to travelling around Britain with a purpose are always attractive and The James Bond Lover’s Guide to Britain is abundantly so. Following James Bond resonates with suggestions of spies, drama, duplicity, and death, and in his discussion of the films as well as the locations Edward Biddulph has imbued his guide with enough of the James Bond aura to tempt Bond enthusiasts. He makes the point that there are over 150 Bond related British sites, including principal locations as well as stand ins for overseas settings, in almost all Bond films and Ian Fleming’s novels. A surprising thought, and one which adds to the enticing nature of this guide. However, the guide could also appeal to those who are just keen to give their travels a focus and, as Biddulph tells it, Bond is a figure who can carry readers all over Britain. To travel with a purpose from Scotland to Cornwall is an intriguing prospect enhanced by Biddulph’s archaeological investigation of the sites, maps and archives that provide historical information about where Bond ventured in a rather different landscape from the modern one that readers will follow. Further, for the person who is not necessarily a huge Bond fan Biddulph shows that many of the Bond sites coincide with those that any tourist may want to visit – restaurants, historic houses, museums, and other attractions. He states that the book reflects his interests of history, archaeology, and cuisine – some universal interests there! See Books: Reviews for the complete review.

Australian Politics

Launch of ‘Gough Whitlam: The Vista of the New’

Speech : Transcript:Check against delivery: Friday 24 October 2025 Sydney

The Hon Anthony Albanese MP

Prime Minister of Australia

I acknowledge the traditional owners of the land on which we meet and I pay my respects to their elders past, present and emerging.

It is a great honour to be with you all for the launch of an outstanding new addition to Australian political biography and indeed Australian history.

Among many distinguished guests, can I acknowledge all the members of the Whitlam family joining us here today.

Including Tony Whitlam, who I learned from this book was very nearly blessed with the name ‘Justinian Dovey Whitlam’ to achieve what Gough called a ‘crescendo effect’.

The tremendous interest surrounding this book speaks for Gough Whitlam’s powerful and enduring hold on the affections and imaginations of so many Australians.

Not just the true believers who have ‘maintained their enthusiasm’.

But all of us whose aspirations, communities and lives have been shaped by the Whitlam legacy.

All of us who have drawn inspiration from Gough’s essential optimism.

From his determination to liberate the talents and uplift the horizons of our citizens, through access to free education and universal healthcare.

From his reimagining of Australia’s place in the world.

From his assertion of equality for women: in our economy, our laws and our society.

From his leadership on land rights.

And from his defining belief that it is the mission of Labor Governments to reject the ‘habits and fears of the past’ and seize the opportunities of the future.

For any author to put forward a new account of the life of such a figure, is an act of real courage.

Especially when you consider that the first three people to write about the Whitlam Government in depth were Laurie Oakes, Graham Freudenberg and Gough Whitlam himself.

Think about that trio.

One of Australia’s best journalists.

Australia’s greatest political speechwriter.

And the Prime Minister at the epicentre of events.

It is a profound credit to Troy Bramston that his work not only belongs in such esteemed company – it actually adds to the picture those giants have painted.

Laurie Oakes gave us a portrait of a new-generation Australian politician, on the march to the Prime Ministership.

Graham Freudenberg wrote about Gough with the deep admiration and affection that characterised Ted Sorensen’s reflections on John F. Kennedy

And – in The Truth of the Matter – Gough was striving above all to set the record straight.

At the distance of 50 years, this book takes us beyond the consuming passions of those immediate political struggles.

And true to its title, offers us a ‘Vista of the New’.

Of course, the fresh insights in these pages are only possible because of the years of research that have been poured into this book.

Troy writes about the staff on Gough’s 1969 election campaign having to haul around a huge trunk filled with volumes of Hansard and a vast accumulation of newspaper clippings and index cards of policy proposals.

That’s also how I picture Troy’s process: part author, part archaeologist.

Sifting through a near-century of correspondence and archival material, as well as years of interviews he has undertaken with so many Labor legends, including, Gough himself.

If you want to know which registry office Gough’s grandmother was married in, or what his primary school maths report was like, or read extracts from the letters he wrote to Margaret during the war, all of that is in here.

But this book is more than the sum of its many parts, more than a mere catalogue or chronology.

In offering us a comprehensive account of Gough’s life before politics and a thoughtful examination of what drew him to parliament and the road he followed to the leadership, we gain a deeper understanding of the forces that shaped his character.

Growing up in Canberra, believing in the value and honour of public service.

His political awakening under Curtin and the 1944 referendum that inspired a lifetime obsession with reforming the Constitution.

His mastery of the House of Representatives, a reflection of his deep respect for that institution.

And that shyness some took as diffidence, which made him something of a solitary individual among the collective.

All this matters.

Because as the accounts of Cabinet and Caucus make clear, perhaps more than any other Government in Australian history, the Whitlam Government was made in its leader’s image.

It bore the imprint of its Prime Minister’s personality, in all its mercurial brilliance and all its crash-through-or-crash courage.

Paul Keating, who makes many insightful contributions to this book, once remarked that he gave more speeches about the Second World War than any Australian Prime Minister since John Curtin.

This was because his four years as PM, almost exactly tracked Curtin’s four years, half a century apart.

In reflecting on all those 50 year anniversaries, Keating said he felt:

“In the lee of Curtin’s trajectory”.

And that this enriched his understanding of the twists and turns of the Pacific war.

For my colleagues and me, our time in office has tracked the 50 year anniversary of the Whitlam Government.

On the 2nd of December 2022, I had the honour of being there in Cabramatta, as a Labor Prime Minister, for the opening of the newly-restored Whitlam family home.

The suburban backyard where people celebrated the ‘It’s Time’ victory, in the community that powered Gough’s passion for urban renewal.

When I travelled to China for the first time as Prime Minister in November 2023, that important step in the deliberate and patient stabilisation of our relationship also marked fifty years since Whitlam’s historic visit.

Penny Wong and I visited Beijing’s Temple of Heaven, the scene of that famous photo of Gough putting his ear to the curve of the Echo Wall.

That was our way of upholding the wisdom of that Chinese proverb: “when drinking water, do not forget those who dug the well.”

When we hosted the leaders of every member of ASEAN at a special summit in Melbourne in 2024, we commemorated a half-century of Australian partnership – an essential element of our engagement in the fastest growing region of the world in human history.

And last month in Port Moresby, we celebrated the golden jubilee of Papua New Guinean independence.

Just as Gough famously declared that independence for PNG ‘was an idea whose time had come’ I was proud to say to Prime Minister Marape that elevating our relationship with PNG to the status of an alliance was an idea whose time had come.

Each of those milestones – and so many more – inspire us and they remind us that Labor Governments are always at our best, when we build to last.

As I said in the House of Representatives, 11 years ago this week, when we came together as a Parliament to pay tribute to the life and service of Gough Whitlam:

“The legacy of our political contribution can be judged by its permanency.”

I do want to make this very personal point.

I love biographies but this is the first Prime Ministerial biography I have read while holding the title, it therefore became a very dynamic and intellectually challenging experience.

There is wisdom in here.

Do not ignore warning signs, engage and respect colleagues.

Understand the dialectical implications of decisions, and be orderly in your decision-making.

This book holds real, ‘contemporary relevance’ for anyone interested in politics or government or Australia’s place in the world.

And while The Vista of the New deals with the injustice of the Dismissal in a characteristically thorough way, importantly, it does not limit itself by looking at Gough Whitlam’s legacy purely through that prism.

It doesn’t diminish the performance of that Labor Government by dealing only with the drama and deception that brought about its downfall.

In the preface to this book, Troy recounts a moving moment in 2013 when Gough said to him:

“I want to be remembered as an achiever, not as a martyr”

This book honours that hope.

This is an account of profound achievements.

And its publication represents a significant achievement too.

It is my great pleasure to wish Gough Whitlam: The Vista of the New, all the very best.

PM&C acknowledges the traditional owners and custodians of country throughout Australia and acknowledges their continuing connection to land, water and community. We pay our respects to the people, the cultures and the elders past, present and emerging.

How the star of lost silent film Jewelled Nights went from the limelight to selling sweets for cinemagoers

Black and white photo of 1920s actress Louise Lovely
Louise Lovely starred in about 50 Hollywood films. (National Film and Sound Archive)
In short:

Tasmania’s early mining days were immortalised on screen in the 1925 film Jewelled Nights by Australia’s first Hollywood star, Louise Lovely, who hoped to take Tasmania to the world stage.

The silent film was a screen adaptation of a popular romance novel by Marie Bjelke-Petersen, the aunt of former Queensland premier Joh Bjelke-Petersen.

What’s next?

The silent film has inspired an art installation at this year’s The Unconformity festival, held at Queenstown. The artist is seeking a permanent home for the work.

It has been nearly 100 years to the day that Tasmania’s remote and rugged west coast played backdrop to an ambitious film project led by a Hollywood silent film starlet.

Considered a lost classic of Australian cinema, Jewelled Nights was mostly shot at Savage River, deep in the bush at an alluvial mine site.

At the time of its release, it was billed to be the making of Hobart as the “Hollywood of the south”, but its production ran overtime, the budget overblown and its star never went on to make another film.

As for Jewelled Nights, only remnants of the silent film remains.

a faded sheet music cover from a silent film
Only a few minutes of the silent film Jewelled Nights remains, but the musical score survived.

The film’s restorer, Bernard Lloyd, previously said filming at that location would have been an extraordinary feat at the time.

“There was no road then, no track there and so to bring this film crew down there, two hours down the gully and then back out again each day, it was a huge ask with the weather, the snakes,”

Mr Lloyd said.

The film featured leading lady Louise Lovely, an Australian darling who had starred in about 50 Hollywood films, mostly by major production companies Universal, Goldwyn Picture Company and 20th Century Fox.

Film historians have said Lovely was the first Australian actress to find success in America.

Black and white photo a woman in jodhpurs holding a pan and shovel
Louise Lovely played a female character who dressed as a man in order to try her luck at mining in the 1925 film Jewelled Nights. (Supplied: Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery)

Marie Bjelke-Petersen — a prolific romance writer considered the Danielle Steele of her time — asked Lovely to star in and produce the film adaptation of one of her books.

At the time, both Lovely and Bjelke-Petersen were celebrities in their respective fields.

In an interview, Lovely said: “Everyone said that good pictures could not be made in Australia. I have set out to prove that they can.”

Only a few minutes of the film Jewelled Nights have survived.

Following its premiere in Melbourne in October 1925, Jewelled Nights reportedly screened to 350,000 people, more than a third of the city’s population at the time.

Its box office success propelled Tasmania and its dramatic landscape onto the big screen.

But now, only fragments of the silent film remain.

Film’s intrigue inspires artwork

The film’s allure has led local Tasmanian artist Jacqueline Dortmans on a deep dive.

Her installation at this year’s The Unconformity festival in Queenstown on Tasmania’s west coast was a homage to the film and Bjelke-Petersen.

“The biggest mystery for me is the film, having been lost, there’s no way to know how Louise Lovely [and her co-producer] told the story,”

Dortmans said.

“We can draw on the book, which tells the story clearly, but what’s unclear is how they told the story in silent film.

“Silent film is not that well understood as a format.

“When you look at other silent films you recognise that they have this way of delivering a punch line just through a couple of words on a screen.”

a close up of a woman's face with fringe
Jacqueline Dortmans says silent film is not a well understood format. (The Unconformity)

Dortmans said she leant heavily into that formula to convey her Jewelled Nights piece, a three-part journey into the book’s setting, the script and its creators.

“It celebrates not just the achievements of Louise Lovely with the film, and the history that the film and book is grounded in, which is the osmiridium mining, but Marie Bjelke-Petersen as a person who is someone who should be more known in the Tasmanian context,” she said.

“She was very forensic in her research.

“She spent time at Savage River and 19 Mile Creek talking to miners and gathering the information to allow her to write with quite impressive accuracy.”

a woman in a fur coat and cloche hat
Romance author Marie Bjelke-Petersen was a celebrity in her time. (Athol H Shmith)
Tasmanian mineral needed for fountain pens

The Jewelled Nights story begins with the fountain pen.

At the turn of last century, Tasmania was the world’s only mined source of osmiridium, a mineral needed for the production of fountain pen nibs.

For years, gold prospectors on the Savage River system thought of the alloy as a nuisance as they panned for the more precious mineral. But, later, as osmiridium’s value was realised, it fetched prices higher than gold.

a black and white photo of people around a hut in the landscape
The Burnt Spur mining site at Savage River has been given heritage listing. (Heritage Tasmania/JH Robinson)

Miners quickly switched their alluvial techniques of gold panning to the search for osmiridium.

They worked streams by diverting water onto dry beds through stone wall channels and dams, many of which survive today.

Rough huts were also set up to house the temporary workforce, including prospector Jos Hancock’s, at Flea Flat, which featured prominently in the film.

These early mining sites, Burnt Spur and Flea Flat, have recently secured permanent heritage listing with the Tasmanian Heritage Council.

a black and white photo of a miner's hut
Jos Hancock’s hut at Flea Flat featured in Jewelled Nights. (Heritage Tasmania/JH Robinson)

In its submission for heritage recognition, the mines were described as presenting “intact archaeological examples of alluvial mining features” and having a “special association with pioneering Australian actor and entrepreneur Louise Lovely”.

Speaking on ABC Radio Hobart, historian Nic Haygarth said of the location:

“Marie Bjelke-Petersen had this idea that Tasmania should be a second Hollywood as it had the wonderful scenery.

“She was a great advocate for Tasmania’s rainforests and the scenery of the west coast.”

Tasmania’s wildness critical to film

At its heart, Jewelled Nights was a love story.

One where Tasmania’s brooding landscape and expansive skies played a role in maintaining the romantic tension between the cross-dressing lead female and the miner she falls in love with.At home with Louise Lovely

A black and white photo of people making a film in the early 1900s

Listen to Chris Wisbey as he explores the house and garden of the former silent film star.

The lead character, Melbourne socialite Elaine Fleetwood, flees to the osmiridium mines of distant Tasmania after leaving her groom at the altar.

There, she dresses as a man in order to work the mines as she has heard there were riches to be made.

But as film restorer Bernard Lloyd said:

“On the mining fields, she finds something much more valuable — true love.”

When it opened, the film was well received by audiences.

But Lovely’s dream of putting Tasmania in the world film scene was crushed after the movie ran dramatically over budget.

“They had a budget of 8,000 pounds, and they only got 5,000 pounds back,” Mr Haygarth said.

Today, that would be a return of $500,000 from a $800,000 investment.

“That pretty much scuppered the deal. There were plans to make two more films, but it was pretty much the end of this idea of making Tasmania a second Hollywood.”

It proved to be Lovely’s final role.

She lived the last 32 years of her life in Tasmania, and some may remember her as the the lady who ran, with her husband, the lolly shop beside the Prince of Wales Theatre on Macquarie Street in Hobart.

A photo of a older woman throwing food for seagulls into the air
Louise Lovely lived the last 32 years of her life in Tasmania. (Supplied: National Film and Sound Archive)

Dortmans said following The Unconformity festival she would search for a permanent home for the artefacts she has amassed for the artwork.

What remains of the film screens regularly at Queenstown’s Gaiety Theatre.

“I dived deeply into silent film,” Dortmans said.

“There’s a confronting statistic that 90 per cent of all silent films are lost. Jewelled Nights is just one of many films that have been lost.”

American Politics

Why Trump Turned to the Sewer 

The president’s disturbing, excremental propaganda campaign 

By Anne Applebaum 

Lieutenant Colonel Harald Jäger was in charge of a Berlin Wall checkpoint on the evening of November 9, 1989, when a garbled televised press conference convinced thousands of East Berliners that they were allowed to cross into West Germany. People ran to the checkpoint. They started shouting at Jäger, telling him to open the barrier, even though no one had told him about any changes. 

Still, “when I saw the masses of East German citizens there, I knew they were in the right,” he told an interviewer, many years later. In another interview, he recalled, “At the moment it became so clear to me … the stupidity, the lack of humanity. I finally said to myself: ‘Kiss my arse. Now I will do what I think is right.’” He opened the barrier and people started walking through. 

Had these events taken place a few months earlier, Jäger might have kept the barrier shut. But the “masses of East German citizens” who had spent that autumn marching against dictatorship in East Berlin, Leipzig, and other East German cities had shaped his understanding of events. Watching them, he understood that most of his countrymen opposed the regime and hated the Wall. If everyone was against it, he no longer wanted to defend it. 

Quinta Jurecic: Resistance is cringe—but it’s also effective 

The differences between the “No Kings” demonstrations that took place across the United States on Saturday and the East German protests 36 years ago are too numerous to list. I saw no riot police at the protest I watched in Washington, D.C. Nor did the demonstrations in the autumn of 1989 feature animal costumes, cute homemade signs, or people dancing the Macarena. But they shared at least one goal: to remind the government’s supporters and enablers that the public is unhappy. The majority of Americans object to President Donald Trump’s politicization of justice, his militarization of ICE, and his usurpation of congressional power. Eventually some of those presidential supporters and enablers might, like Jäger the border guard, be persuaded to side with the majority and help bring this assault on the rule of law to an end. 

The people in the White House know this too, and they reacted accordingly. Trump, the successor to George Washington and Abraham Lincoln, posted an AI-created video of himself as a fighter pilot, wearing a crown, flying over an American city, and dumping shit onto American protesters. The point was not subtle: Trump wanted to mock and smear millions of Americans, literally depicting them covered in excrement, precisely so that none of his own supporters would want to join them. 

Cindy Lou eats with friends at The Constitution, the cafe at the National Archives of Australia

This is an easy place to enjoy a meal, with its varied menu, good coffees and a range of pastries. There is a need for more staff training as the service was friendly rather than efficient. However, the whole experience was pleasant, from the easy parking, scenery, and generous delicious meals. Although we were unable to visit the exhibitions on this occasion, The Constitution is a cafe to which I shall return, with plenty of time to see the other features offered at the Archives.

A Spanish meal in Melbourne for Cindy Lou

Degrave’s is in one of Melbourne’s lanes, near Flinders Street Station. It has a lovely atmosphere and great staff. The food was generous and flavoursome, but not to the level of the wonderful experiences we had at La Tasca in London. And Spanish food in Spain is another story, particularly when travelling with English friends for whom Spain was almost a second home. Nevertheless, I would eat there again for the atmosphere and the delicious leeks in particular.

A Statue Of Bridget Jones Is Being Unveiled In Leicester Square Soon – As The Iconic Character Becomes The Latest Addition To London’s Free-To-Visit Sculpture Trail

One of the most captivatingly chaotic characters in movie history is being immortalised in the form of a shiny new statue in the heart of London.

 Katie Forge – Staff Writer • 27 October, 2025

It’s been almost a quarter of a century since Bridget Jones first graced our cinema screens, woefully wailing ‘All By Myself‘ in her living room. And now, four films (and countless questionable decisions) later, our beloved Bridget is being immortalised in the form of a shiny new statue that’s mere moments away from being unveiled.

The statue in question has been designed by London-based studio, 3D Eye, and will feature the popular protagonist (portrayed by Oscar-winning actress, Renée Zellweger) in all her perfectly imperfect glory.

The sculpture will be permanently perched in the heart of Leicester Square, and is being revealed on November 17 at an unveiling ceremony. Renée Zellweger is set to be in attendance along with some of her Bridget Jones: Mad About the Boy co-stars, Sally Phillips, Chiwetal Ejiofor, and Leo Woodall.

The Bridget Jones sculpture being created
Credit: Scenes in the Square / Studio 3D

A teaser image has been revealed. And whilst we don’t know the age at which the character is set to be depicted, we do know that the statue will be wearing a necklace with a ‘D’ pendant, and clutching Bridget’s signature diary and pen.

Scenes in the Square

The showstopping statue is landing in London, courtesy of Leicester Square’s on-going sculpture trail, ‘Scenes in the Square’. Bridget Jones will be the first rom-com character to have earnt themselves a sought-after spot on the trail’s star-studded line-up. The free-to-visit trail is filled to the brim of cinematic icons. Bridget Jones will join the likes of Paddington Bear, Mary Poppins, Harry Potter, Batman, Gene Kelly, and Indiana Jones.

Helen Fielding, author of the Bridget Jones books, comments: “For Bridget to be honoured as a British Icon with her own statue alongside Paddington Bear, Mary Poppins and Admiral Lord Nelson (alright, he’s down the road a bit!) is a huge thrill and reason for everyone to raise a glass of Chardonnay to being ‘just as you are.’ I am touched and delighted for Bridget and Renée and hope that Bridget’s Mummy Pants will ensure a sleek silhouette for this exciting statue unveiling.”

Michael Morris, director of Bridget Jones: Mad About the Boy, says: “Bridget has always belonged to London – her mess, her magic, her heart. To see her immortalised here, in the middle of the city she’s stumbled through and loved so fiercely, feels like the perfect love letter to her and to everyone who’s ever cheered her on.”

Week beginning 22 October 2025

Lisa Murkowski Far from Home An Alaskan Senator Faces the Extreme Climate of Washington, D.C. Penguin Random House Christian publishing | Forum books, June 2025.

Thank you, NetGalley, for providing me with this uncorrected proof for review.

My immediate interest in this book arose from Senator Lisa Murkowski’s vote on the recent ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ adopted by the Senate on the Republican 50/51 vote with Republican Senators, Susan Collins, Rand Paul, and Thom Tillis voting against. Senator Murkowski, having won benefits for her constituency, Alaska, supported the Bill. The fluidity of American voting patterns was an important part of political activity on the fictional The West Wing and has been apparent throughout the time I have been observing American politics via television. These patterns are very different from the Australian process, where an election would not be complete without policy statements, demands about ‘where is the money coming from,’ close media observation of how policies might be implemented and how they compare with alternative party policies. Having voted for a successful party, the Australian electorate understands that the promised polices will usually be implemented by the incoming Government. This underpins most Members of Parliament loyalty to their party and its promises during an election. The American context, however, is remarkably different and Senator Murkowski’s adherence to her constituency and its requirements, even when the bill was so manifestly egregious, is perhaps understandable. That three of her fellow Republicans did not support the Bill, and in my view her support was unacceptable, her decision made me to want to understand more about Murkowski. See Books: Reviews

Brandon Rottinghaus Scandal Why Politicians Survive Controversy in a Partisan Era Columbia University Press, November 2025.

Thank you, NetGalley, for this uncorrected proof for review.

I was interested in this book as a way of discovering what an academic approach to political scandal would be, the way in which various types of scandal would or could be measured and the public response to scandal. Rottinghaus has fulfilled my quest for information. However, I am left with a concern that in an era when the mainstream media appears to be numbing public response to egregious political behaviour, an academic work would risk doing so. There is certainly a role for a history of scandalising political behaviour – after all why not? A valid argument can be made that political life is not immune to the forces that impact other areas of society where scandalous behaviour occurs. I would have liked the work to have made it clear that political life and behaviour is not necessarily more prone to scandal than other areas of power. I would also have appreciated an approach that undermined the prevailing view that various examples of scandalous behaviour are equal. The moral imperative might be similar, but the outcomes for supporting and ensuring that a democratic society remains democratic are markedly different depending on the nature of the behaviour seen as scandalous.  

The publication features polling data that contributes to understanding definitions of political scandal, factors affecting perceptions of aversion, and the impact of partisanship. By using Watergate as a point of reference, it compares observer attitudes toward historic and more recent political events. An updated edition addressing commutations and Presidential pardons could offer further insight by contrasting current practices with those of the past, and there are additional topics relevant to contemporary politics that may warrant academic study. See Books: Reviews

Cindy Lou eats at Blackfire

I haven’t been to Blackfire for ages, and this evening really wanted the king prawns that they serve as an entree. Fortunately, we were able to get in, although the restaurant filled rapidly as it neared 7.00pm. I had smoked mussels on bruschetta tapas – very nice indeed, and the prawns as my main course. As the prawns come with a Chilli sauce, I always indulge myself with mashed potato – and this was served with green beans which was an added delight. My friend enjoyed the empanadas and found the lamb ragu pasta excellent – and very generous. The coffees made a pleasant finish to the meal as we can no longer indulge in desserts (although I would have liked a chocolate with mine).

American Politics

No Kings

Joyce Vance from Civil Discourse <joycevance@substack.com> 

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more

No KingsJoyce Vance Oct 18 

People are protesting. It’s a march for our love: Democracy.

“Do marches really work?” I was asked last night. Absolutely. And we are all out there today, proving it. We can’t expect instant results for years of relentless damage to our country. But we are continuing to come together to fix it.

Signs from some of my favorite places.

Send me your pictures and let’s share our experiences with each other in the comments. It is a good day for us.

We’re in this together,

Joyce

‘Huge’ and ‘Massive’ Crowds for No Kings Rallies

The Daily with Sarah Jones <politicususa@substack.com> Unsubscribe

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more; 18 October 2025.

News coverage of the No Kings rallies keeps repeating the words “massive” and “huge,” saying this is bigger than the June protest and “quite the scene.”

While it’s too early for official numbers, outlets are reporting “huge” and “massive” crowds for No Kings rallies in larger cities on the East coast, which doesn’t take into account the many smaller rallies that are taking place in red areas, which might make an even bigger political statement than actual numbers.

October 19, 2025

Heather Cox Richardson from Letters from an American <heathercoxrichardson@substack.com> 

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more

October 19, 2025Heather Cox RichardsonOct 20 

All last week, Republican leaders tried to portray the No Kings protests scheduled for Saturday, October 18, as “Hate America” rallies. G. Elliott Morris of Strength in Numbers partnered with Atlanta-based science newsroom The Xylom to estimate that as many as 8.2 million people turned out yesterday to oppose the Trump administration. The mood at the protests was joyful and peaceful, with protesters holding signs that championed American principles of democracy, free speech, equality, and the rule of law. As the Grand Junction, Colorado, Daily Sentinel put it in a front-page headline: “‘This is America’ ‘No Kings’ protests against Trump bring a street party vibe to cities nationwide.”

Then last night, after the protests, the president’s social media account posted an AI-generated video showing Trump in a fighter jet with “KING TRUMP” painted on the side. The president sits in the airplane in front of something round that could be seen as a halo. He is wearing a gold crown; weirdly, the oxygen mask is over his mouth and chin, rather than mouth and nose.

Once in the air, the plane drops excrement on American cities, including what seems to be New York City. The excrement drenches protesters, one of whom is 23-year-old liberal political commentator and influencer Harry Sisson. Journalist Aaron Rupar of Public Notice, who shares media clips that reflect politics, commented: “Trump posts AI video showing him literally dumping sh*t on America.” Historian Larry Glickman noted that media outlets make much of alleged Democratic disdain for ordinary Americans, but have had little to say about the disdain for Americans embodied by Trump’s video.

Several administration videos and images have responded to Americans saying “No Kings” by taking the position “Yes, We Want Kings,” an open embrace of the end of democracy. But they are more than simple trolling. Led by Trump, MAGA Republicans have abandoned the idea of politics, which is the process of engaging in debate and negotiation to attract support and win power. What is left when a system loses the give and take of politics is force.

The idea that leaders must attract voters with reasoned arguments to win power and must concede power when their opponents win has been the central premise of American government since 1800. In that year, after a charged election in which each side accused the other of trying to destroy the country, Federalist John Adams turned the reins of government over to the leader of the opposition, Thomas Jefferson. That peaceful transfer of power not only protected the people, it protected leaders who had lost the support of voters, giving them a way to leave office safely and either retire or regroup to make another run at power.

The peaceful transfer of power symbolized the nation’s political system and became the hallmark of the United States of America. It lasted until January 6, 2021, when sitting president Trump refused to accept the voters’ election of Democrat Joe Biden, the leader of the opposition.

Now back in power, Trump and his loyalists are continuing to undermine the idea of politics, policies, and debate, trying instead to delegitimize the Democratic opposition altogether. Yesterday, during the protests, President Donald Trump, Vice President J.D Vance, and the official White House social media account posted a video of Trump placing a royal crown on his head, draping a royal robe around his shoulders, and unsheathing and brandishing a sword (an image that raises questions about why Trump wanted one of General Dwight D. Eisenhower’s swords so badly that he had the museum director who refused to hand it over fired). In the video, Democratic leaders including former House speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and what appears to be Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) first kneel and then bow to Trump.

Administration imagery doesn’t simply insult opposition leaders; it undermines the idea of politics by suggesting that Democrats are un-American. Last night the White House continued its racist crusade against Democratic leaders by posted an AI-generated image of Trump and Vance wearing jewel-encrusted crowns positioned above an image of House minority leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) and Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) wearing Mexican sombreros. The caption reads: “We’re built different.”

The administration’s hostility to loyal opposition is translating into direct assaults on our government. House speaker Mike Johnson is refusing to seat a member of the opposition. Voters chose representative-elect Adelita Grijalva (D-AZ) on September 23 to fill a vacant House seat, but Johnson has come up with one reason after another not to seat her. Until she is sworn in, she has no access to government resources and cannot represent her constituents. She also cannot be the 218th signature on a discharge petition that would force a vote on whether to demand the release of the Epstein files, the final signature needed.

Grijalva recorded a video reinforcing the political system, saying: “We need to get to work, get on the floor, and negotiate so we can reopen the government.”

But Republican congressional leaders are refusing even to talk with Democrats to reopen the government, let alone to negotiate with them. They are trying to force Democrats simply to do as they say, despite the fact that 78% of Americans, including 59% of Republicans, support the Democrats’ demand for an extension of the tax credit that lowers the cost of healthcare premiums on the Affordable Care Act markets. Lindsay Wise, Anna Wilde Mathews, and Katy Stech Ferek of the Wall Street Journal reported today that more than three quarters of those who are insured through the ACA markets live in states that voted for Trump.

A video of Trump in a bomber attacking American cities carries an implied threat that the disdain of throwing excrement doesn’t erase. This morning, Trump reinforced that threat when he reminded Fox News Channel host Maria Bartiromo: “Don’t forget I can use the Insurrection Act. Fifty percent of the presidents almost have used that. And that’s unquestioned power. I choose not to, I’d rather do this, but I’m met constantly by fake politicians, politicians that think that, that you know they it’s not like a part of the radical left movement to have safety. These cities have to be safe.”

That “safety” apparently involves detaining U.S. citizens without due process. On Thursday, Nicole Foy of ProPublica reported that more than 170 U.S. citizens have been detained by immigration agents. She reports they “have been dragged, tackled, beaten, tased and shot by immigration agents. They’ve had their necks kneeled on. They’ve been held outside in the rain while in their underwear. At least three citizens were pregnant when agents detained them. One of those women had already had the door of her home blown off while Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem watched.”On Friday, the Trump administration pushed its attempt to use the military in Democratic-led cities, asking the Supreme Court to let it deploy troops in Chicago immediately. Chris Geidner of Law Dork notes that four judges, two appointed by Democrats and two appointed by Republicans, have rejected the administration’s arguments for why they must send in troops. Now the Department of Justice has appealed to the Supreme Court, asking for a decision on the so-called shadow docket, which would provide a fast response, but one without any hearings or explanation.

The administration’s appeal to the Supreme Court warned that there was “pressing risk of violence” in Chicago—a premise the judges rejected—and said preventing Trump from going into the city “improperly impinges on the President’s authority.”

How much difference will the No Kings Day protests, even as big as they were, make in the face of the administration’s attempt to get rid of our democratic political system and replace it with authoritarianism? What good is an inflatable frog against federal agents?

Scholar of social movements Lisa Corrigan noted that large, fun marches full of art and music expand connections and make people more willing to take risks against growing state power. They build larger communities by creating new images that bring together recognizable images from the past in new ways, helping more people see themselves in such an opposition. The community and good feelings those gatherings develop help carry opposition through hard moments. Corrigan notes, too, that yesterday “every single rally (including in the small towns) was bigger than the surrounding police force available. That kind of image event is VERY IMPORTANT if you’re…demonstrating social coherence AGAINST a fascist government and its makeshift gestapo.”

Such rallies “bring together multigenerational groups and the playfulness can help create enthusiasm for big tent politics against the monoculture of fascism,” Corrigan writes. “The frogs (and unicorns and dinosaurs) will be defining ideographs of this period of struggle.”—

Second “No Kings Day” protests the largest single-day political protest ever*, with 5.2-8.2 million participants

UPDATE 10:00 AM Oct. 19: After adding new data, our median estimate is 5.2 million, and the upper bound is 8.2. The numbers in this article have been updated. Future estimates will be updated on the spreadsheet, but not here…

The Daily
The Daily

Rachel Maddow Explains Why No Kings Could Soon Reach Critical Mass And Topple Trump

Rachel Maddow dove into the numbers behind what the No Kings protests mean and how they could topple Trump’s wannabe regime.

Sarah Jones & Jason Easley

Oct 21, 2025

It isn’t certain yet whether No Kings is a protest movement or a political movement. No Kings will need to transfer its momentum into electoral success to get results, but right now, No Kings is building fast towards critical mass.

Maddow said while discussing what makes No Kings different from other protests:

We’ve talked to them (Indivisible) a lot, many times going back years. You might also have noticed that every time we talk to the folks from Indivisible, going back to the very beginning, uh, they emphasize one specific thing. They emphasize thinking local. So for these No Kings protests, for example, they said if you have to travel more than an hour in order to get to your nearest No Kings protest, then don’t do that.

Don’t travel more than an hour.

If you have to go more than an hour to find one, that means you should be organizing your own wherever it is that you live. Now that is not generic protest advice, that is very specific to this movement and it has specific consequences in practical terms following that principle.

This weekend looked like this not one giant protest in one central place, even though there were some really big protests in some places. Instead though, it was, it was a gazillion different protests. Yes, in some big cities, but also in small towns, in every nook and cranny, all across this country.

Australian Politics


The Australian’s post
(from Facebook)


The Australian 

Yesterday at 07:34 ·

Opinion: Donald Trump has come through in spades for Anthony Albanese after locking in the $368bn AUKUS pact, signing-off on an $8.5bn critical minerals deal and waxing lyrical about the Prime Minister. Read more: https://bit.ly/4qs62tR

!!!!!

The post below is an interesting reflection on a song sung at many schools in Australia and the choice of our National Anthem. The writer refers to South Australians singing this song. However, it was also sung in Western Australian schools, and the Facebook comments recalling the song come from other states as well. They also suggest that it is preferred to the chosen national anthem.

Lainie Anderson Author’s post

South Aussies, who remembers Song of Australia?

There is a land where summer skies

Are gleaming with a thousand dyes,

Blending in witching harmonies, in harmonies;

And grassy knoll and forest height

Are flushing in the rosy light,

And all above is azure bright.

Australia, Australia, Australia!

I found it on my recent research trip to the West Terrace Cemetery, and it took me straight back to primary school in Port Vincent. The lyrics were written in 1859 by Adelaide poet and teacher Caroline Carleton, wife of the West Terrace Cemetery sexton (it’s believed she wrote the piece while sitting in the cemetery). The music was written by German immigrant and composer Carl Linger, who helped to create Adelaide’s first philharmonic orchestra.

Hugely popular in SA, it was sung in all public schools from the 1880s right through to the late 20th century. It was one of four songs put to a public vote to choose our official national song in 1977 (the others were God Save the Queen(!!), Advance Australia Fair and Waltzing Matilda). Song of Australia won the South Aussie vote but came fourth overall. Advance Australia Fair became the national anthem in 1984.

Brilliant and Bold – Bold and Brilliant

CONVERSATIONS WITH ‘ORDINARY’ & ‘EXTRAORDINARY’ WOMEN

This meeting on zoom was held on Sunday 19 October and is available on Jocelynne’s Scutt’s Facebook feed.

The flyer (edited) read:

International Struggles for Women’s Autonomy –
Iran, Nepal, and Women & Girls Living Under Occupation

Today, women of Nepal and women of Iran are focused on restoring democracy, freedom, security and peace to their respective countries.
Brilliant & Bold! has a prime opportunity this month of October 2025 to hear from women of the diaspora who are campaigning for democratic rights in Iran and Nepal, and to learn of a campaign for the UN to create the
post of Special Rapporteur for Women and Girls Living Under Occupation (WAGLUO).

The speakers were: Elahr Zibabi, from Iran, is living in London, and is a part of the Iranian diaspora campaigning for freedom, justice, security, democracy and peace for Iran. 

Benzu Laxmii Oli, from Nepal, is living in Perth, Western Australia, and engaged in activism directed toward ensuring that women and girls live with freedom and equality, secure in the knowledge that they are entitled to dwell in the land of their birth without fear.

Arising from the discussion, I heard about Sue Crampton’s book, Behind the Oleander, which I was able to purchase during the meeting on my kindle.

Week beginning 15 October 2025

Samantha Vérant The Writers’ Retreat Storm Publishing, July 2025.

Thank you, NetGalley, for providing me with this uncorrected proof for review.

A thriller set around a writers’ retreat and writers? What could be a more enticing location and concept? Sadly, the premise promised by the title is not fulfilled. To be fair, it is established that the retreat is also a commercial enterprise selling perfumes, a unique alcoholic beverage and foodstuffs, and custom-made paper. Also, the cleverness of the novel revolves around writing, in this case a memoir and a novel based on events in each of the writer’s lives. This device sets the scene for the possibility that fiction will override fact, that a story can be embellished or even be lies, and that the protagonists whose firsthand accounts make up the chapters might be creating the dramatic effects which are the writer’s prerogative.

The narrative begins with a prologue in which an unnamed person provides advice about removing hurtful people. And perhaps this person has done so – there is a blade in their hand, and they wipe clean all the surfaces before departing. In the first of short chapters, Liv Montgomery introduces herself, her aspirations, her nemesis, Kat, and her successful submission of her thriller to an agent. The agent invites Liv to a writers’ retreat. Coincidently, or not, Miriam a woman from Liv’s past, is part of the agency’s team. Sienna, with a past and current hostile relationship with Liv, is also a participant. She is writing non-fiction which could suggest that her utterances are believable. However, with the twists and turns taken in The Writers’ Retreat this is not necessarily the case. See Books: Reviews for the complete review.

Kelly Oliver, The Case of the Body on the Orient Express, Boldwood Books, July 2025.

Thank you, NetGalley and Boldwood Books for this uncorrected proof for review.

What an absorbing and enjoyable read Kelly Oliver has served up, along with the food that Dorothy L. Sayers consumes throughout the hunt for a murderer. Agatha Christie, only slightly more circumspect with her cups of cream that she enjoys at almost every turn of the plot, joins her, Eliza, and Theo on the Orient Express on its journey to Constantinople, as they knew Istanbul. Jane, Eliza Baker’s sister, also features, as a MI5 agent, introducing a spy theme to the ‘cosy mystery’ as this series is described. This is the first of the Detection Club series that I have read, and I look forward to more as I found it more enticing than the usual cosy mystery.

The combination of real and fictional characters is smart. Agatha’s trip has been arranged to help her recover from her husband, Archie’s, deception. However, personal despair is secondary to her enthusiasm for life – a possible trip to an archaeological dig, and closer to events on the Orient Express, a murder to solve. Her friendship with Dorothy provides plenty of discussion about writing, plotting a murder, and solutions. The introduction of the obnoxious Eric Blair adds to the deft weaving of fact and fiction, not at the Tom Stoppard level in his Rosencranz and Guildenstern Are Dead, but nevertheless, genuine fun. Eliza, Sayers’ companion, and secretary to the secretary of the London Detective Club (and formerly of Scotland Yard) is an engaging character, with her distaste for the humorous way the Club treats death, her commitment to her sister and beloved Queenie, her beagle. Theo Sharp, erstwhile chess companion who disappeared abruptly in the middle of a game, rejoins Eliza and the detective novelists on the Orient Express – in a steward’s uniform.

Death is an almost immediate companion as the Orient Express travels towards Istanbul. But it is accompanied by comic interludes, descriptions of Eliza’s and Jane’s shady past, sharp asides about Eric, who has renamed himself George Orwell, and the red herrings associated with any Agatha Christie plot. Kelly Oliver’s Death on the Orient Express owes something to the latter but has its own daring characters and plotting to make it very much her own. This is a comfortable but nicely harrowing read for a wintry night.

Valerie Keogh, The Writer, Boldwood Books, July 2025.

Thank you, NetGalley, for providing me with this uncorrected proof for review.

Valerie Keogh never disappoints, and as I began The Writer, I knew that a treat was to follow. Cara is working, or trying to, on her thirtieth novel – a psychological drama like her previous successful works. As Arty, her husband leaves for work, Tillie her friend variously supports her or tries tough love to get her over her vacillation and morbid speculations about  the notes she has begun to receive, and her agent and editor variously encourage her to bring this thirtieth novel to fruition, Cara sits at her word processor bereft of words, or the means to process the few that she  drags up. Cara is not going to succeed in writing the thirtieth novel, until her speculations about the notes become an integral part of her life and her writing.

The interplay of Cara’s fiction and her life become enmeshed in her failure to separate fact and fiction. The notes become an unwieldy part of Cara’s life, encouraging her to reach implausible, to the reader, but all too plausible to Cara, decisions about her friend, husband, and her reality. Interspersed with Cara’s reactions to the notes, her insecurities about herself and suspicions about her husband’s past are the ruminations of a man who wishes her ill. His resentment of her success in contrast with his failures, lead him into punishing her for what he sees as a past unforgivable slight. See Books: Reviews for the complete review.

Art Gallery of New South Wales

More photos from the wonderful Yolŋu power: the art of Yirrkala exhibition.

Raw Story October 9 2025

Thom Hartman

I just saw the movie that will define our age — you can tell because right-wingers hate it

This week has felt like one battle after another. We all watched video after video of ICE agents dropping from helicopters onto a Chicago apartment block, kicking in doors and terrorizing Black and Hispanic American and immigrant families, then trashing and stealing their possessions without ever presenting a warrant signed by a judge.

The GOP pushed the country to the brink again with another government shutdown threat while right-wing legislatures redrew districts to erase the votes of millions. We heard more talk of arresting journalists for doing their jobs, and watched as the military rolled through American cities as if people here are the enemy.

Each day has felt like a slow-motion assault on democracy itself.

Louise and I went to see Leonardo DiCaprio’s new movie, One Battle After Another, last weekend, and I was stunned. It’s a film of rare courage and artistry. From the first scene to the last, Paul Thomas Anderson reminds us that cinema can still tell the truth about power and conscience. It’s a film that demands attention, not permission.

The movie runs about two-and-a-half hours, but it’s so action- and drama-packed that it felt like it flew by in less than an hour. I knew people similar to those characterized in this movie when I was in East Lansing SDS back in 1968-69: seeing them portrayed like this was a hoot! This is truly brilliant film-making.

Predictably, conservatives rushed to condemn it. Some labeled it “irresponsible” or claimed it “glorifies violence.” What they really mean is that it unsettles them. They prefer art that flatters authority and soothes the comfortable. This film refuses to do either.

The world Anderson portrays is not a fantasy. When federal agents execute suspects, when protests are manipulated to justify repression, when truth is distorted by propaganda, that is not simply fiction. It reflects the deep anxiety of a society that’s watched Trump’s executive power become far too concentrated and way too cruel. Anyone paying attention to the news knows how real that danger feels.

The rightwing National Review published a piece titled “There Will Be Bloodlust in ‘One Battle After Another’” that accused Anderson of romanticizing 1960s radicalism. Yet DiCaprio, who stars in the film, called it a “timely satire.” Speaking to Reuters, he said, “It’s not a film where people are imposing any political beliefs on anyone else. It’s satire on both ends.”

That contrast says everything. Conservatives want to see chaos; Anderson and his cast are inviting reflection. The violence in the film is not triumphant; it’s painful, personal, and tragic. It shows what happens when injustice festers until ordinary people begin to break, as I saw in the people I knew in the Weather Underground back in the day.

History reminds us that art has always frightened the powerful. Uncle Tom’s Cabin was banned in the South because it forced them to confront slavery. Upton Sinclair’s The Jungle was smeared by industrialists for revealing the cruelty of unregulated capitalism. Protest music of the 1960s and artists like Bob Dylan and Pete Seeger were condemned as “unpatriotic” by the same crowd that called Dr. King a radical.

When art tells the truth, power always howls.

Today the same pattern repeats. The same rightwing billionaires funding “outrage” over this film are working to silence teachers, censor libraries, and rewrite history to protect privilege. They fear a nation that can still feel empathy; they fear what happens when people start asking why power serves so few.

One Battle After Another is not a call to arms. It is, instead, a warning about what happens when corruption becomes normal and compassion becomes rare. It asks us to look at the machinery of cruelty and decide whether we’ll stand by or resist. That choice is the same one that generations before us have faced.

If this film makes people uncomfortable, that’s its purpose. Democracy doesn’t survive by comforting the powerful. It survives when ordinary people demand justice and truth, even when it stings.

One Battle After Another will be called divisive by those who profit from division. They’re wrong. The real division in this country is between those who believe art should serve power and those who believe art should challenge it.

I stand with the challengers, because when we fall silent, we serve power; when we speak, we hold it to account.

American Politics

Heather Cox Richardson from Letters from an American <heathercoxrichardson@substack.com> 

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more

On October 9, President Donald J. Trump’s office issued an official proclamation declaring Monday, October 13, “Columbus Day.” The proclamation says that the day is one on which “our Nation honors the legendary Christopher Columbus—the original American hero, a giant of Western civilization, and one of the most gallant and visionary men to ever walk the face of the earth. This Columbus Day, we honor his life with reverence and gratitude, and we pledge to reclaim his extraordinary legacy of faith, courage, perseverance, and virtue from the left-wing arsonists who have sought to destroy his name and dishonor his memory.”

The proclamation goes on to present a white Christian nationalist version of American history, with much more emphasis on Christianity than Trump’s previous, similar proclamations. It claims that Columbus was guided by a “noble mission: to discover a new trade route to Asia, bring glory to Spain, and spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ to distant lands.” “Upon his arrival,” it says, “he planted a majestic cross in a mighty act of devotion, dedicating the land to God and setting in motion America’s proud birthright of faith.”

“Guided by steadfast prayer and unwavering fortitude and resolve,” it goes on, “Columbus’s journey carried thousands of years of wisdom, philosophy, reason, and culture across the Atlantic into the Americas—paving the way for the ultimate triumph of Western civilization less than three centuries later on July 4, 1776.”Then the proclamation turns to MAGA’s complaints about modern revisions of this triumphalist history, saying: “Outrageously, in recent years, Christopher Columbus has been a prime target of a vicious and merciless campaign to erase our history, slander our heroes, and attack our heritage.” Our nation, the proclamation says, “will now abide by a simple truth: Christopher Columbus was a true American hero, and every citizen is eternally indebted to his relentless determination.”

This proclamation completely misunderstands the fifteenth-century world of expanding European maritime routes that entirely reworked world trade—including trade in human beings—and the role of Italian mariner Christopher Columbus, who worked for Spain’s monarchs Ferdinand and Isabella, in that expansion.

It also misses what historians call the “Columbian Exchange”: the transfer of plants and animals between the Americas and the “Old World”—Europe, Asia, and Africa—after Columbus’s first landfall in the Bahamas in 1492. That exchange went both ways and transformed the globe, but its effect on the Americas was devastating. When Columbus and his sailors “discovered” the “New World,” they brought with them both ideologies and germs that would decimate the peoples living there.

Estimates of the number of Native people living in North America and South America in 1490 vary widely, but there were at least as many as 50 million, and possibly as many as 100 million. In the next 200 years, displacement, enslavement, war, and especially disease would kill about 90% of those native peoples. Most historians see the destruction of America’s Indigenous peoples as the brutal triumph of European white men over those they perceived to be inferior.Historians are not denigrating historical actors or the nation when they uncover sordid parts of our past. Historians study how and why societies change. As we dig into the past, we see patterns that never entirely foreshadow the present but that give us ideas about how people in the past have dealt with circumstances that look similar to circumstances today. If we are going to get an accurate picture of how a society works, historians must examine it honestly, seeing the bad as well as the good. With luck, seeing those patterns will help us make better decisions about our own lives, our communities, and our nation in the present.

History is different from commemoration. History is about what happened in the past, while commemoration is about the present. We put up statues and celebrate holidays to honor figures from the past who embody some quality we admire.

The Columbus Day holiday began in the 1920s, when a resurgent Ku Klux Klan tried to create a lily-white country by attacking not just Black Americans, but also immigrants, Jews, and Catholics. This was an easy sell in the Twenties, since government leaders during the First World War had emphasized Americanism and demanded that immigrants reject all ties to their countries of origin. From there it was a short step for native-born white American Protestants to see anyone different from themselves as a threat to the nation.

The Klan attacked the Knights of Columbus, a Catholic fraternal organization. Klan members spread the rumor that one became a leader of the Knights of Columbus by vowing to exterminate Protestants and to torture and kill anyone upon orders of Catholic leaders.

To combat the growing animosity toward Catholics and racial minorities, the Knights of Columbus began to highlight the roles those groups had played in American history. In the early 1920s they published three books in a “Knights of Columbus Racial Contributions” series, including The Gift of Black Folk by pioneering Black sociologist W.E.B. Du Bois.

They also turned to an old American holiday. Since the late 1860s, Italian Americans in New York City had celebrated a “Columbus Day” to honor the heritage they shared with the famous Italian explorer. In the 1930s the Knights of Columbus joined with media mogul Generoso Pope, an important Italian American politician in New York City, to rally behind the idea of a national Columbus Day. In 1934, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, aware of the need to solidify his new Democratic coalition by welcoming all Democratic voters, proclaimed Columbus Day, October 12, a federal holiday. In 1971 the day became unfixed from a date; it is now the second Monday in October.The Knights intended for Columbus Day to honor the important contributions of immigrants—and Catholics—to American society. But in the 1960s a growing focus on the lives and experiences of Indigenous Americans forced a reckoning with the choice of Columbus as a standard bearer. Currently, seventeen states and the District of Columbia use the official holiday to celebrate Indigenous history. Some Oklahoma tribal members simply use the day to honor their tribe.

As society changes, the values we want to commemorate shift. In the 1920s, Columbus mattered to Americans who opposed the Ku Klux Klan because celebrating an Italian defended a multicultural society. Now, though, he represents the devastation of America’s Indigenous people at the hands of European colonists who brought to North America and South America germs and a fever for gold and God. It is not “left-wing arson” to want to commemorate a different set of values than the country held in the 1920s.What is arson, though, is the attempt to skew history to serve a modern-day political narrative. Rejecting an honest account of the past makes it impossible to see accurate patterns. The lessons we learn about how society changes will be false, and the decisions we make based on those false patterns will not be grounded in reality.

And a society grounded in fiction, rather than reality, cannot function.—

Notes:https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/10/columbus-day-2025/https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/10/07/columbus-day-indigenous-peoples-day-or-just-a-regular-monday-it-depends-on-where-you-are/https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/proclamation-2101-columbus-dayhttps://www.kofc.org/en/news-room/columbia/2020/july/kofc-racial-equality.html

Joyce Vance from Civil Discourse <joycevance@substack.com> Unsubscribe

Are We the Nazis Now?

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more

Are We the Nazis Now?

How do we meet this moment?

Joyce Vance Oct 13 READ IN APP 

It’s hard to watch. People being treated like they are less than human because of their perceived immigration status. Like this six-year-old girl.

In early October, federal agents with Border Patrol, the FBI, and ATF arrested 37 people in a raid on a Chicago apartment building at 7500 S. South Shore Drive. They banged on residents’ doors overnight, according to a report in the Chicago Sun Times, “pulling men, women and children from their apartments, some of them naked, residents and witnesses said.” A witness said she saw “agents dragging residents, including kids, out of the building without any clothes on and into U-Haul vans,” and that “kids were separated from their mothers.” DHS claimed the neighborhood was “a location known to be frequented by Tren de Aragua members and their associates,” but offered no evidence in support and didn’t confirm that any of those arrested were members of the Venezuelan gang.

Earlier this month, at West Loop Elementary School in Chicago, Illinois, ICE was forced to release two sisters it pulled out of their car at a school pick up, because they have legal status under DACA. But that didn’t stop the masked agents, captured on video by a quick-thinking teacher, from surrounding the car and smashing its windows before dragging the two out. One of the sisters cried out her name and where she lived to bystanders, an apparent effort to prevent being “disappeared” into ICE custody.

It is already horrible enough. But we read The Diary of Anne Frank in school. Among the book’s important lessons is that where things start is not where they end up. Bad can become worse in the blink of an eye. The propaganda used to dehumanize people, combined with fear, social pressure, and denial, can have devastating results. People who think it’s too dangerous to speak out may decide to take the path of least resistance and turn a blind eye, hoping it will stop. But a government that is already willing to commit the outrages we are observing is unlikely to do so. Fascism, as it did in Europe during World War II, takes its toll.

To be clear, we are already past the point where it’s only people in the U.S. without legal immigration status who are at risk.In Portland, Oregon, on October 5, ICE agents threatened to arrest and kill an ambulance driver. The incident is documented by witness reports filed with the ambulance crew’s employer and its union by different individuals, as well as 911 calls, dispatch reports, and emergency communications. The ambulance was called to the ICE office to treat an injured protester, but agents refused to let the ambulance leave once the patient was loaded. When the driver put the vehicle into park, it rocked forward, and an agent responded angrily, saying the ambulance driver tried to hit him. The driver reported that “they were not only accusing me of such a thing, but crowding and cornering me in the seat, pointing and screaming at me, threatening to shoot and arrest me, and not allowing the ambulance to leave the scene. This was no longer a safe scene, and in that moment, I realized that the scene had not actually been safe the entire time that they were blocking us from exiting, and that we were essentially trapped.”

A video filmed in September that recently went viral shows ICE firing on protestors and hitting Presbyterian minister David Black in the head with a pepper ball. The minister, who was injured, is now suing. DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin tweeted that the shooting was justified because “What this clipped video doesn’t show is that these agitators were blocking an ICE vehicle from leaving the federal facility—impeding operations.” Apparently, the new standard operating protocol is that if an ICE agent decides you’re in the way, they can shoot you. “If you are obstructing law enforcement, you can expect to be met with force,” she concluded her tweet, complaining that the minister had “flipped the bird” at Secretary Noem the previous week.

There are now so many of these stories flooding the country, and they come with such rapidity, that it’s impossible to keep up with all of them. In other words, these incidents aren’t the exceptions. They aren’t unusual. And there’s every indication that they are tolerated, even encouraged, by Trump’s machine.

Trump promised he’d deport violent criminals. Instead, ICE is going after legal residents and terrorizing children. The message: if you’re an American citizen, don’t exercise your First Amendment rights unless you want to become a target too.

A PBS Newsletter story titled “Immigration agents become increasingly aggressive in Chicago” reported on actions that include: Storming an apartment complex by helicopter as families slept. Deploying chemical agents near a public school. Handcuffing a Chicago City Council member at a hospital … ‘They are the ones that are making it a war zone,’ Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker said Sunday on CNN. ‘They fire tear gas and smoke grenades, and they make it look like it’s a war zone.’”

The Bulwark’s Tim Miller interviewed George Retes, another U.S. citizen. Retes was detained by ICE for three days, two of which he says he spent in solitary confinement. Retes said the conditions he was kept in were dehumanizing. He was given only a hospital dress to wear, the lights remained on 24 hours a day, and he was under constant observation through a glass door.

One of the most chilling comments following that raid on the Chicago apartment building came from a woman named Pertissue Fisher, an American citizen who lives in the building. She said the agents rounded up people, including her, and only asked questions later. “They just treated us like we were nothing,” Fisher said. That’s how federal agents, who took oaths to uphold the law, are behaving under this administration. And no one in the administration seems in the least bit concerned about it.

We aren’t even better off in the ways Trump promised. Deporting school kids doesn’t make us safer. Americans don’t want the jobs that aren’t being done in immigrants’ absence. The Labor Department warned in “an obscure document filed with the Federal Register last week that the near total cessation of the inflow of illegal aliens” is threatening “the stability of domestic food production and prices for U.S. consumers.”

But beyond the absence of benefits from this administration’s mass deportations, it’s the absence of humanity we see around us that threatens us the most. People who aren’t criminals are thrown to the ground. People are treated with a lack of respect for their basic human dignity. Many of them are hard-working folks who want to be able to love this country and give back because of the opportunity it gives them and their families. Instead, a president who is the son of immigrants and has been married twice to immigrants has become the face of nationalism, using hate and horror to expand his control over people, both American citizens and immigrants, on American soil. Are we the Nazis now?

What’s certain is this: No matter where Donald Trump wants to take this country, you and I are not going along for the ride. On Friday, House Speaker Mike Johnson said that the No Kings rally on Saturday was a “hate-America” rally. He said the people attending would be “the pro-Hamas wing” and “the antifa people.” He’s wrong. We are, in the best tradition of America’s Greatest Generation, truly anti-fascist. And in 2025, anti-fascism begins at home, because we love this country and we believe in democracy. We’re ready.

We’re in this together,

Joyce


Joe Biden’s post
fromFacebook


Joe Biden 

I am deeply grateful and relieved that this day has come – for the last living 20 hostages who have been through unimaginable hell and are finally reunited with their families and loved ones, and for the civilians in Gaza who have experienced immeasurable loss and will finally get the chance to rebuild their lives.

The road to this deal was not easy. My Administration worked relentlessly to bring hostages home, get relief to Palestinian civilians, and end the war. I commend President Trump and his team for their work to get a renewed ceasefire deal over the finish line.

Now, with the backing of the United States and the world, the Middle East is on a path to peace that I hope endures and a future for Israelis and Palestinians alike with equal measures of peace, dignity, and safety.

National Film and Sound Archives

The National Film and Sound Archives has been one of my favourite places to visit. Many years ago, the somewhat creaky displays and crackling soundtracks listened to on large earphones, sitting on stools in front of the display, were of old (very old) radio (wireless) soap operas – “When A Girl Marries” and “Doctor Paul” from America, and our own wonderful “Blue Hills” by Gwen Meredith with its familiar introduction (reminding us that what we were hearing was number…of so many episodes) and its haunting music. Dad and Dave were there, old films giving credit to Dotty Lyall and her ilk and fascinating sounds of hoof beats made by coconut shells etc.

These memories naturally had to make way for newer material’ perhaps A Country Practice featured; this must have been a period in which I visited less frequently. However, what I do recall was that although different, the exhibitions were interesting, numerous and well worth a visit.

On the most recent occasion I visited, two weeks ago, my disappointment was profound. Unfortunately, I see that disappointment echoed in some of the reviews. There was little on display, and the lack of interactive displays of a high standard was a real low point. Although there were tablets accompanying many of the historic displays in the library, these were very ordinary indeed. The posters of well-known Australian films showed that they had been successful overseas. A historic film of Perth showing bread deliveries to houses, The Daily News (long defunct) being delivered, lovely scenery along the Swan River and the old ferries was interesting. However, where was the list outside the theatre advertising this, and the other films that could be seen during a visit?

The ‘star’ of the exhibitions was the installation, Step into Inferno, an audiovisual installation by Paris-based Australian artist, Mikaela Stafford. This was commissioned by the NFSA and created in response to Stafford’s experience as a resident artist.

This was certainly worth viewing. The NFSA site suggests that there is a great deal of activity, films and events taking place at the NFSA. However, there was little evidence of that during our visit.

On the other hand, the information on the NFSA site was extensive, informative and showed what interesting films are being shown in the ARC Cinema. An example appears below:

A Day at the Movies: Send Me No Flowers (Dementia Friendly)

Dementia Friendly Screening Sun 19 Oct 10:15 AM Arc Cinema

Allocated Seating

 102 Mins

1964 | DCP | USA |D: Norman Jewison

George (Rock Hudson) and Judy (Doris Day) are a happily married middle-aged couple. When hypochondriac George overhears his doctor discussing a terminally ill patient on the phone, he mistakenly believes that he is the one who is dying and that his days are numbered. In a panic, George enlists the help of his friend Arnold (Tony Randall) to find a new husband for Judy. The two friends begin searching for suitable candidates and eventually settle on Bert (Clint Walker), a successful businessman and an old flame of Judy’s. However, George’s strange behavior leads Judy to suspect that he is hiding an affair.

Based on the stage play of the same name, this delightful romantic comedy is the third and final film that stars Hudson, Day, and Randall together.
 
A Day at the Movies is the NFSA’s exciting new dementia-friendly film program for cinema-lovers, designed for the enjoyment and comfort of people living with dementia, and their families, friends, carers and companions. The screenings are brought to you by film and media experts Dr Jodi Brooks (Project Lead, University of New South Wales), Dr Fincina Hopgood (University of New England), and independent screen culture and audience development specialist Karina Libbey.

An initiative of the ACT Government, the program is funded by the ACT Government and aligns with its Age-Friendly City Plan. A Day at the Movies receives in-kind support from the National Film and Sound Archive (Venue Partner), Carers ACT, Dementia Australia, the ACT Ministerial Advisory Council on Ageing and Bulla Dairy Foods.

A 10% discount is available on paid tickets for group bookings of 6 or more people. Carers receive a free ticket, courtesy of Carers ACT, and all attendees can enjoy a complimentary Bulla ice cream. For more information, please visit nfsa.gov.au/dementiafriendly, call 02 6248 2000 or email enquiries@nfsa.gov.au.

Event timings
10:15 AM Welcome! Join us for tea and coffee in the courtyard
10:25 AM Take your seat in Arc Cinema
10:30 AM Feature presentation: Send Me No Flowers (with introduction)
11:30 AM Intermission (10 minutes)
 12:30 PM Socialising and afternoon tea in the courtyard
 1:15 PM Event concludes

For more information on A Day at the Movies and dementia-friendly screenings at NFSA, visit nfsa.gov.au/events-experiences/dementia-friendly-screenings

For additional information about accessibility and planning a visit to the NFSA, visit nfsa.gov.au/visit-us

And, behind the many ‘Staff Only’ doors the work of the archive continues. I just wish more of the marvellous changes in radio, television and film that have taken place since the beloved “Blue Hills” was the star of the exhibition were on display for visitors to see on unplanned visits.

Week beginning 8 October 2025

Danielle Leavitt, By the Second Spring Seven Lives and One Year of the War in Ukraine, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, May 2025.

Thank you, NetGalley, for providing me with this uncorrected proof for review.

Danielle Leavitt’s enterprise is an important part of recognising Ukrainians as other than ‘faceless war people.’ In her introduction she makes an important beginning toward achieving this purpose by describing the Ukrainian people she has met through living in Ukraine for part of each year since she was twelve years old. Until she began this book, where she records the information from seven Ukrainian’s diaries, her recall was of their humour, folk songs, ‘selling lingerie in underground walkways’ and, one of their pleasures, strolling. Leavitt spent a year assembling information from Ukrainians who wrote diaries, some spasmodically, others more consistently, of their experiences in the first year of the war.

Leavitt uses the diary entries from seven of these authors. Anna is eighteen and a police cadet; Maria is in her mid-twenties from Mariupol whose husband was defending the city during this period; Polina was living in America and returned to Ukraine with her American husband to help; Tania runs a pig farm and remains in her village during the invasion; Vitaly owned a coffee shop near Kyiv; Volodymyr was an engineer at Chernobyl and became a writer and film maker in the 1980s; and Yulia is a middle aged woman, skilled in handicrafts, from a small town in Donetsk.

The book is in five parts, following the seasons from the first winter to the second spring. Each story combines the Ukrainian diarist’s individual account and the judicious introduction of events around that account. For example, events in Vitaly’s life, before and after the outbreak of war are combined with an account of the historic relationships between Ukraine and Russia. This makes excellent reading, particularly for those who know little of Ukrainian and Russian history. At the end of the first part of Vitaly’s story, he has opened his coffee shop, an accomplishment based on his financially successful recycling business. Maria’s story resonates with its domestic detail, and then the plunge into the effects of the invasion. Here, too there is a political background provided, so again there is a rich amalgam of domestic and personal information and the political context to this new example of Russian intransigence.

Part 5 begins with Tania’s story of the liberation of her area, but the never-ending deprivation of living in what had been a war zone. At the same time, there is evidence that life proceeds with work and domestic tasks vying for attention and energy. Yulia’s narrative is an amazing insight into the way in which she began rehabilitation after being fitted with a prosthetic leg. Polina and her husband continue with their aid projects. But at the same time the narrative considers the wider population, the despair, and at the same time proceeding with lives that at times ignore the war.

It is the weaving together of the personal and domestic, the political and historical, war and yet the sometimes-ordinary way in which people lead their lives, which makes this book a truly valuable read. Leavitt’s interviews with the Ukrainians whose narratives are central to the book, together with interviews with their families and friends, and moving further afield, anecdotes from other Ukrainians, achieves her purpose. She gives Ukrainians, their lives prewar and during the invasion import, they become known. Providing an historical context is another feat that Leavitt has accomplished with skill – it becomes accessible. Leavitt has produced an important work, maintaining Ukraine and Ukrainians in the public eye as so much of the story fades from the television screens. I found By the Second Spring a heartrending and an inspiring read.*

*Although the review appears at Books: Reviews, I also wanted to print it in full here. It is an important book.

Kimberly Heckler A Woman of Firsts Margaret Heckler, Political Trailblazer Foreword by Jean Sinzdak, The Globe Pequot Publishing Group, Inc. | Lyons Press, February 2025.

Thank you, NetGalley, for providing me with this uncorrected proof for review.

This biography not only covers the period in which five presidents, from different parties were elected (Johnson, Nixon, Ford, Carter, and Reagan) but when Sandra Day O’Connor and Ruth Bader Ginsberg made their mark on the Supreme Court. It would have been appealing without this context, but the additional information makes this biography exceptionally engaging. Of course, this context is only relevant to Margaret Heckler’s public life – her private life, including her upbringing with distant parents, her passion to do well and her marriage are also relevant. To have accomplished so much, to have been a loving and successful wife and mother, and to have made such a distinctive career makes for an absorbing read. Kimberly Heckler’s biography is the very readable story of a woman, as in the title, of firsts. See Books: Reviews for the full review.

Inside Story – Books & arts – Zachary Gorman 

June 16 2025.

Millicent Preston Stanley’s vocation

The first woman elected to NSW parliament used any means possible — from petitions to theatrical melodrama — to advance her causes

Politics as public service: Millicent Preston Stanley c. 1952. Mitchell Library, State Library of New South Wales

Though the Liberal Party’s “women problem” might seem perennial, the conservative side of Australian politics could once boast of being at the vanguard of female parliamentary representation — with the important caveat that Australia was never as advanced on this issue as we were with our early granting of female suffrage.

Eight of the first ten women elected to federal parliament were Liberal Party members, with one of the remainder being the Independent Labor MP for the Victorian seat of Bourke, Doris Blackburn. Likewise, almost every woman to achieve the honour of being the first elected to each of our nation’s state parliaments sat on the centre-right of the political divide. The sole exception was a Tasmanian, Margaret McIntyre, who was elected to the Legislative Council in May 1948 as a true independent, only to be tragically killed in a plane crash less than four months later.

But, as Wendy Michaels shows in A Battle-Axe in the Bear Pit, her new biography of the NSW record-holder Millicent Preston Stanley, these conservative trailblazers hardly received the consistent support of their male colleagues. That support was even less forthcoming and reliable a century ago — when “Miss” Preston Stanley became one of the members for the multiseat Eastern Suburbs electorate in 1925 — than it is today.

A full-length biography of Millicent, as the author refers to her subject throughout, is long overdue. Not only did she crash through the gender barrier in our oldest parliament and most populous state; as founder of the Australian Women’s Movement Against Socialisation, or AWMAS, she also led a national campaign that may well have tipped the scales towards Robert Menzies at the watershed federal election of 1949 — and thus altered the course of Australian political history. That Millicent did so by deliberately keeping her organisation separate from the newly formed Liberal Party tells you all you need to know about her experience of dealing with patriarchal party machines. See Further Commentary and Articles arising from Books* and continued longer articles as noted in the blog for the complete article.

A Battle-Axe in the Bear Pit: Millicent Preston Stanley MP
By Wendy Michaels | Connor Court | $29.99 | 250 pages

Jilly Cooper cutting the cake at the Pym Society 25th anniversary celebration in 2019. We’ll miss her.

From: The Reality behind Barbara Pym’s Excellent Women The Troublesome Woman Revealed ‘Pym and Jilly Cooper express[ed] a mutual interest in their meeting at Hatchard’s 1979 Authors of the Year party. Despite the sharp difference in their writing, Cooper refers to having ‘nearly fainted with excitement to see two sweet-faced women standing smiling, slightly apart from the mob.  It was Barbara and her sister Hilary.  Rushing over, I only had time to stammer out a few words of gratitude’ (Jane and Prudence, Forword 2007, xi).  In the preface to the Virago publication of Jane and Prudence Cooper refers to Pym as her favourite author, replacing ‘Nancy Mitford, Georgette Heyer and even Jane Austen’ (JP, 2007, p.vi).  In the same year, Cooper published Class, which Harrison Solow suggests explains much of Pym’s characterisation. Cooper’s humorous non-fiction assessment of class in part explains some of Pym’s descriptions, but Pym also uses her observations to effect their own subversive comedy.’

Art Gallery of New South Wales

After a short walk around the permanent exhibitions, we walked across to the new gallery where the Yolŋu power the art of Yirrkala is exhibited. This gallery is beautifully lit and a fitting site for the sublime exhibition we were so fortunate to be able to visit. If I am in Sydney again before it closes, another viewing would be wonderful.

From the gallery site:

‘For almost 100 years artists at Yirrkala have shared art as a means of cultural diplomacy – as a respectful assertion of power in its diverse forms, from sovereignty to influence, authority and control, to energy, strength and pride.

Yolŋu power: the art of Yirrkala showcases the extraordinary artists of Yirrkala in north-east Arnhem Land, Northern Territory, and the power of their art from the 1940s to the present. The exhibition considers the significant moments in Yirrkala’s history when artists have consciously altered their practice, developed new styles or embraced new mediums. In covering multiple generations, the exhibition highlights familial connections and cultural continuation. It also contextualises the work of individual artists within the broader school of artists from Yirrkala and surrounding Miwatj Country, whose contribution to both Australian and, increasingly, international art, is profound.

This exhibition is accompanied by a comprehensive publication which offers a range of perspectives on the art of Yirrkala, from the use of art as activism to the role of cultural inheritance and the development of the art movement that has emerged from this significant community.

The exhibition is presented in partnership with the Indigenous art centre in Yirrkala, Buku-Larrŋgay Mulka.’

Some of the artists exhibited above, and two detailed works, as exhibited above.

More from this magnificent exhibition next week.

The Talented Mr Ripley

The Talented Mr Ripley was marked by the high-quality script. Joanna Murray-Smith treated Patricia Highsmith’s novels with the respect they deserve. The acting was excellent, but for me Murray -Smith’s script was the highlight. She was true to the novels, ensuring that the reprehensible feelings upon reading Tom Ripley’s life of murder, fraud and duplicity were duplicated while watching the play – we wanted him to get away with it! Some observations on ethical fiction appear below. This article was first published in the Women’s History Network blog.

Ethical Fiction: Essential? Desirable? Irrelevant?

Robin Joyce

‘We often need literature to make our feelings intelligible to us.’

 Joanna Trollope, The Rector’s Wife

Part 1

The strong response to a readers’ blog asking for examples of ethical fiction, a list of topics under the title of ethical fiction and recent commentary suggests that ethics in fiction is a matter of interest. However, it is quite uncommon for mainstream reviewers to use ethics as a criterion in judging fiction. The focus of debate about Gillian Flynn’s Gone Girl is unusual. Some see the novel as depicting women in a range of ways that undermine stereoptypes and therefore acceptable. Others find it unforgivably sexist. Yet others agree but say, ‘So what!’ What is ethical and whether ethical fiction is essential, desirable or even irrelevant is clearly a question rather than a given. Journalists have a code of ethics; documentaries are expected to be truthful and speculation acknowledged. In contrast, imaginary works are not controlled by such rules or expectations. Should they be? If they were, would fiction be spoilt? Would novels primarily concerned with ethics risk becoming merely didactic? If novels are unethical do they encourage their readers to be unethical too? Does unethical fiction create an unethical society? Does ethical literature contribute to an ethical society?

The value of ethical fiction is partly in its role in bringing a critical reading to unethical fiction. Ethical fiction also has an important role in providing readers with a multifaceted way of looking at the world. While accepting not all fiction must be ethical, it seems there is an argument for it being a desirable factor in the range of available fiction. Although it would be ideal to be able to demonstrate the impact of ethical fiction to my knowledge research is limited.  

However, ‘Why fiction is good for you. The beautiful lies of novels, movies, and TV stories have surprisingly powerful effects — and may even help make society tick’ does   ask questions about the value of fiction: is it ‘good for us?’ Is it ‘mentally and ethically corrosive?’ ‘Does fiction build the morality of individuals and societies, or does it break it down?’ Gottshall argues that recent research shows that fiction has an influence. The more involved the reader becomes in the story, the more influential it becomes.  It is suggested that non-fiction increases a reader’s imperviousness to argument and evidence but the ‘intellectual guard’ is dismissed by the reader of fiction. Gottschall argues:

perhaps the most impressive finding is just how fiction shapes us: mainly for the better, not for the worse. Fiction enhances our ability to understand other people; it promotes a deep morality that cuts across religious and political creeds… So those who are concerned about the messages in fiction — whether they are conservative or progressive — have a point. Fiction is dangerous because it has the power to modify the principles of individuals and whole societies. [1]

Speculation about the dangerous influence of fiction has a long history, as has the classification of the novels to which I refer as ‘ethical’. [2] John Tinnon Taylor’s Early Opposition to the English Novel The Popular Reaction from 1760 to 1830 (first published in 1943) deliberates on the history. Some early concern was with the newness of the form. Parallel criticism of novels was a rather sneering attitude to novels, novelists and their readers. Typical was Hannah More’s apprehension about the practice where groups of women listened to one woman reading “mischievous” books to them while they worked. However, readers also often hid their eagerness to read novels.  However, circulating libraries led to an even wider dissemination of novels and it became clear that scorn had been unsuccessful in dampening readers’ enthusiasm. Condemnation of the influence of reading fiction increased.

Similar to contemporary debate about the type of literature young people should read, early discussion about the influence of popular works presented two alternatives. Was reading fiction likely to develop an interest in reading or was it more likely to undermine readers’ morals? Arguments about whether women would be harmed or would benefit from reading novels women were associated with those about whether women should be educated. Women readers were also accused of taking fiction more seriously than household duties, crying over the imaginary ills of novelists’ characters and ignoring their children’s needs. In the main the romantic notions in fiction were seen as the problem. However, more in keeping with the ethical novels that will be discussed in part 2, some were also seen as promoting what was seen as unusual behavior, that is, using fiction as a reference for moving outside the social mores affecting women.  

Was reading fiction likely to develop an interest in reading or was it more likely to undermine readers’ morals? Arguments about whether women would be harmed or would benefit from reading novels women were associated with those about whether women should be educated. Women readers were also accused of taking fiction more seriously than household duties, crying over the imaginary ills of novelists’ characters and ignoring their children’s needs. In the main the romantic notions in fiction were seen as the problem. However, more in keeping with the ethical novels that will be discussed in part 2, (See Further Commentary and Articles arising from Books* and continued longer articles as noted in the blog) some were also seen as promoting what was seen as unusual behavior, that is, using fiction as a reference for moving outside the social mores affecting women.  


[1]Jonathan Gottschall. Boston Globe (April 29, 2012)

[2] In this paper novels such as those referred to as social commentary or issues based are subsumed under the description ‘ethical’.  This description fosters the idea that novels that address issues or are usually described as social commentary are integral to all our lives, rather than works that are somehow apart from their readers.

[3]Jonathan Gottschall. Boston Globe (April 29, 2012)

[4] In this paper novels such as those referred to as social commentary or issues based are subsumed under the description ‘ethical’.  This description fosters the idea that novels that address issues or are usually described as social commentary are integral to all our lives, rather than works that are somehow apart from their readers.

Week beginning 1 October 2025.

Mark Splitstone, Für Elise, Girl Friday Productions | Amalgam Books, May 2025.

Thank you, NetGalley, for providing me with this uncorrected proof for review.

Für Elise is sensitive and thoughtful, written in a deceptively simple style which is at times almost stilted. However, it is this writing style that is the key to the cleverness of the novel. Hans’s and Elise’s relationship is stilted, at its beginning when both are shy young musicians meeting through their music in Dresden and later when Hans returns after years in a Russian POW camp. The dissonance continues in their coming from markedly different social environments and is accentuated through their living in a city renowned for its beauty, and the impact of war upon that beauty. Dresden’s destruction is reflected in the couple’s relationship which is also broken by the war. When Hans leaves Dresden to fight for Germany for a vision he only haltingly follows he is damaged by his experiences. So, too, is Elise.

Throughout the novel Nazi ideology also creates dissonance ranging from quiet, short comments and questioning between the two as they forge a relationship to the more vigorous questioning by Hans’s father. The hesitant, questioning acknowledgement that they all live in a world of fear, irrational bigotry and demands, at the same time as going about their lives as members of families, a workplace or school, and a social environment is also portrayed not only by the content by the writing.

Hans is a sensitive and shy musician; Elise is a little more forthcoming. Their relationship eventually prospers despite the problems of social differences. However, when Hans returns from Russia, he recognises that he and Elise need to find a way back to each other. Their lives in communist Germany, east of the wall are contrasted with that of Hans’s POW friend who chose to go to the West. Sometimes familiarity is not the answer, and the development of Hans’s and Elise’s relationship in the rubble of Dresden recognises this. See the complete review at Books: Reviews.

Minka Kent, The Perfect Roommate, Thomas & Mercer, June 2025.

Thank you, NetGalley, for providing me with this uncorrected proof for review.

The Perfect Roommate cleverly combines a crime with reflection on social mores that define character and class. Although none of the characters is particularly appealing, they are interesting enough to maintain the focus that is the strength of any plot – keeping readers wondering about what happens next. In addition, there is unexpected warmth between characters, some honest, some not so honest. Nevertheless, the depiction of relationships, while being a device to provide motivation to the characters, is a thoughtful way to sharpen the portrayal of the roommates, Meadow and Lauren; their parents, Lauren’s friends, Tessa and Thayer, and Elisabeth, Meadow’s employer/friend and her husband, Professor Bristowe. Set in a university town, it could be expected that the students have their minds on their future careers. For others this is not the case at all. See the complete review at Books: Reviews.

British Politics

LABOUR LIST – journal of the British Labour Party

‘Is feminism “back” at the Foreign Office?’

Dorothy Sang

25th September, 2025, 6:00 am

Yvette Cooper’s appointment as Foreign Secretary presents a critical moment for the UK – a chance to revive leadership on women’s rights and gender equality at a time when both are under assault globally. The last few years have shown how political choices can actively undermine progress, and the importance of a strong UK response. 

Geopolitics have rocked our security and economic landscape, and what seemed like a resolute stance and prioritisation on gender equality at the beginning of Labour’s premiership, has very quickly unravelled. During his time overseeing aid and foreign policy priorities, David Lammy presided over cuts to the UK aid budget and a de-prioritisation of gender equality within the remaining funds. While understanding these decisions were not lightly taken, they are also not abstract.  They will directly jeopardise women’s rights organisations, the very groups delivering life-saving services and advocating for systemic change in some of the world’s most challenging contexts. From Afghanistan to Sudan, from Gaza to climate-affected communities in Nepal and Bangladesh, women and girls are facing the erosion of the support structures that uphold their rights and give them a chance to survive and thrive.

These decisions were made despite polling commissioned by CARE International UK that showed public support for funding women and girls’ rights remains strong, even in a context of cuts. By contrast, the decisions made under Lammy’s Foreign Office, reflect both a detachment from this public sentiment and the longstanding evidence of what works. Reducing the aid budget and deprioritising gender equality undermines the UK’s credibility as a defender of rights, diminishes its global impact, and signals a retreat from the principled leadership the world has come to expect.

Enter Yvette Cooper. Her career demonstrates both experience and a sustained commitment to women’s leadership. She has written extensively on amplifying women’s voices and the power of women to transform communities. But let’s be clear –  being a feminist in principle is not the same as being a feminist in practice. Cooper now has the tools, portfolio, and opportunity to translate feminist principles into action; to protect and expand funding for women’s rights organisations, integrate women’s leadership into humanitarian responses, and use UK diplomacy to push back against anti-rights actors globally.

Why does this matter? Because the rise in global misogyny and the growth of anti-rights actors is not just a social issue – it is a threat to global stability and security. Just as climate denial and anti-vaccine movements undermine public safety and international cooperation, attacks on women’s rights erode democratic institutions, fuel polarisation, and drive violence. Feminism in foreign policy is not optional; it is central to peace, resilience, and global stability.

The stakes could not be higher. A recent UN Women survey revealed that nearly half of women’s organisations working in crisis-affected areas risk shutting down within six months due to declining global aid. These are organisations that run life-saving services, provide legal and psychosocial support, and advocate for systemic change in countries where governments may be indifferent – or worse – to women’s rights. Without urgent intervention, decades of progress will be reversed.

The question now is whether, under Cooper, the UK will step up or continue to step aside. Feminism at the Foreign Office is not about slogans or token gestures. It is about principled, evidence-based leadership that recognises women and girls as drivers of change, not passive recipients of aid. It is being resolute that advancing gender equality is not just about women and girls, but about levelling up entire societies, unlocking progress and prosperity for all. It’s about shedding the notion that women’s rights is a fringe issue for the ‘woke’ – and instead reclaiming Britian’s proud legacy as the birthplace of the suffragette movement and decades of feminist

activism. It is about demonstrating, through the UK’s money, power and influence, that Britain will not abandon its commitments at a time when the world is watching.

Critically, Cooper must act with urgency. As the new Foreign Secretary, she has the opportunity to turn the tide. To restore funding, champion women’s leadership, and ensure that gender equality is woven into every corner of UK foreign and development policy. This is not a small ask. It will require political courage, strategic thinking, and the ability to navigate a world increasingly hostile to feminist progress. But it is achievable, and it is essential.

For those of us working alongside women’s rights organisations across the Global South, the message is clear: we are ready to work in partnership, but we need the UK to lead, not retreat. Standing with women and girls in crises is not charity. It is a strategic, evidence-based, and morally imperative approach that strengthens communities, bolsters stability, and reasserts the UK’s role as a global leader.

Yvette Cooper has a chance to make this moment count. The world – and millions of women and girls – will be watching.

Tom Watson Newsletter September 25, 2025

Tom Watson <tomwatsonofficial@substack.com>

Watching The Hack, remembering the fear

Tennant, Jones and Carlyle deliver; the show stirs old memories but skirts the hardest questions on accountability.

There is so much I want to tell you about ITV’s new drama, The Hack. It covers two stories that are linked by police corruption and tabloid criminality. I played a small role in investigating the scandal. I could tell you about the fear of retribution, the bewilderment as the scandal grew or the bleakly comic moments that happened along the way.

In the end, there is only one question that matters: Does Keir Starmer have courage?

Will he protect the Metropolitan police if it chooses to investigate a cover up? Will he back a contempt of Parliament inquiry to test new evidence that the company broke rules and undermined a Select Committee inquiry?

Or does he want it all to go away and, like so many before him, reach a venal accommodation with Murdoch’s lawbreaking company?

A story in this week’s Mail on Sunday may give you the answer. Political Editor Glen Owen claims, and I quote, “Morgan McSweeney lobbied organisers of the Donald Trump state banquet in order to secure an invitation for Rupert Murdoch, No 10 sources have said.” If you do not know him, Morgan is the Prime Minister’s chief of staff and closest adviser. He is having a difficult week but as far as I can see, he hasn’t denied the story.

Anyway, The Hack.

The Hack is gripping. Jack Thorne runs twin tracks, the Guardian investigation led by Nick Davies and the Met thread led by DCS Dave Cook, that converge on tabloid criminality and police corruption. David Tennant is sharp and restless as Davies. Toby Jones gives Alan Rusbridger quiet authority. Robert Carlyle brings flinty resolve to Cook. When the drama plays it straight, it has pace, purpose and moral clout. Dan Ryan plays the Brummie version of me. In case you’re asking, yes, I did find it a bit weird.

What I missed was the constant sense of threat we felt at the time, the fear. The drama glances at intimidation, legal muscle and cold, quiet warnings, but only in passing. Nor does it ask the obvious questions: why is Rebekah Brooks still chief executive of the UK arm of Murdoch’s company, and what does that say about accountability?

Still, if you want a good drama with excellent performances, I recommend it.

Australian Politics

PM addresses UN on climate, global action and Security Council seat

The New Daily
Sep 25, 2025, updated Sep 25, 2025

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has used his debut speech to the United Nations to renew Australia’s bid for a seat on the UN Security Council.

Pushing the case for Australia, Albanese said the Security Council was a platform for middle powers and small nations to “voice – and achieve – our aspirations”.

“That is why Australia is seeking a place on the UN Security Council in 2029-30,” said Albanese on Thursday (AEST).

The security council bid, which was first launched by the Turnbull government in 2015, is supported by the Coalition.

But Opposition Leader Sussan Ley and foreign spokeswoman Michaelia Cash warned it could not detract from addressing pressures Australians faced at home.

“The Coalition will always back Australia’s national interest and we stand ready to work with the government in any way we can to help support Australia’s bid for a seat at the table,” they said in a statement.

US President Donald Trump has been leaning on America’s allies to pull more of their weight on the world stage amid a perception they are too reliant on US support.

Amid increasing US isolationism, Albanese warned that America could not be relied upon to uphold the international rules-based order on its own.

“The creation of the international rules-based order owes much to the post-war leadership of the United States of America,” Albanese told the UN General Assembly in New York.

“For the region Australia calls home, that stability has underpinned a generational economic transformation.

“But we cannot ask — and should not expect — any one nation to uphold the rules or guarantee the security on which all of us depend.”

Australia last had a non-permanent seat on the council in the 2013-2014 term — its fifth since the first UN session in 1946.

In a wide-ranging speech, Albanese also exhorted the world’s nations to co-operate with more action on climate change and peacekeeping.

Albanese called for an end to conflict in Gaza and Ukraine, and alleviating poverty and inequality.

His appeal for greater international co-operation comes with the US under Trump increasingly vacating its space as global leader and the rules-based order threatened by the rise of authoritarianism and regional conflict.

Albanese’s speech came a day after Trump delivered a fiery tirade in the same room, lambasting nations like Australia that have recognised Palestinian statehood and telling European leaders: “Your countries are going to hell.”

Trump has leaned on America’s allies to pull more of their weight on the world stage amid a perception they are too reliant on US support. Australia has so far resisted calls to lift defence spending from about 2 per cent to 3.5 per cent of gross domestic product.

The issue could be on the agenda when Albanese sits down with Trump in Washington on October 20, after months of back-and-forth to secure a face-to-face meeting.

The White House talks were announced before Albanese briefly met Trump and posed for a selfie with him at a reception for world leaders on Wednesday.

Albanese described their interaction as a “very warm and engaging chat”.

He said Australia was investing in defence, development and diplomacy in the Indo-Pacific region, where the US has entrusted it to stave off growing Chinese influence.

He said Papua New Guinea would soon become Australia’s newest ally, despite a recent bid to sign a mutual defence treaty unravelling during independence anniversary celebrations.

All nations, including middle and smaller powers like Australia, had to maintain faith in the institution of the UN by ensuring its principles were backed up with deeds, Albanese said.

“If the United Nations steps back, we all lose ground,” he said.

“If we give people reason to doubt the value of co-operation, then the risk of conflict becoming the default option grows.

“If we allow any nation to imagine itself outside the rules, or above them, then the sovereignty of every nation is eroded.”

Albanese urged the world to embrace clean energy, called for a ceasefire and release of hostages in Gaza, and supported the Coalition of the Willing’s efforts to secure peace for Ukraine on their terms.

But there was no mention of the pivotal AUKUS deal with the US and Britain, under which Australia is supposed to get US-made nuclear submarines.

The US is reviewing the three-country agreement to ensure it aligns with Trump’s “America first” agenda.

Albanese is due to meet his Sri Lankan counterpart and potentially sit down with Turkey’s strongman leader, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, on his last full day in the US. He then flies to London to meet British counterpart Keir Starmer and the King.

-with AAP

Bob McMullan

Could the Teals win Senate seats in an expanded parliament?

Important discussions are taking place within the government and before the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters about increasing the size of the federal parliament.

I support increasing the size of the Senate representation of the states to 14 each with consequential changes to the size of the House of Representatives.

Such a large increase is caused by the nexus provision in the constitution which requires the House to be twice the size of the State Senate representation.

This remains one of the most counter-productive clauses in the Constitution, but that is an issue for another day.

However, any increased size of State Senate representation will have potential consequences for subsequent elections as it will significantly reduce the quota of votes required to elect a Senator.

It should make it easier for the Greens, One Nation and Jacquie Lambie to maintain their seats, although it will not necessarily enhance their chances of increasing their Senate numbers.

Given the upsurge in House votes for the Teals (that is, candidates supported by Climate 200) in every state it raises the question of the senate prospects of similar candidates.

The data shows that if the Teals make the right decisions and commit some resources it is possible, even likely, that the they could win several Senate seats.

Let’s look at the data from the last election and then at the decisions the Teals and their backers would need to make to bring this about.

In most of the mainland states the number of first preference votes won by Climate 200 backed candidates suggest that it is an achievable task to gain at least half a quota in an election for a seven seat Senate election. Once over half a quota the Teal-backed candidate would be favorite to win a seat.

In NSW the candidates supported by Climate 200 won 272,872 primary votes in the 11 House seats they contested in 2025. The 6th candidate elected to the Senate in NSW in 2025 was the One Nation candidate who won 302,438 votes or 0.42 quotas. A mere 1000 votes from each of the 35 seats Teal candidates did not contest in 2025 would see a Teal Senate election candidate with at least 307.000 votes or 0.45 Quotas. This would put the Teal Senate candidate ahead of One Nation for the 6th position and would certainly suggest a very good chance of winning one of 7 available seats in an enlarged parliament.

Nothing can be certain about future elections, but it is clear that there is a possible pathway to success for a Teal Senate candidate in NSW.

The situation in Victoria is a little more complex but should still be promising for a Teal Senate candidate in the right circumstances.

The 6th candidate elected in Victoria at the last election was a 3rd Labor candidate elected on 2.43 quotas. The 8 Teal candidates won 215,006 votes in their House seats which would have be sufficient to gain 0.40 of a quota in the Senate. Approximately 2500 votes per electorate in the remaining 30 seats would have led to 0.5 quotas. The highest vote for an unsuccessful party in the Victorian Senate election in 2025 was 0.31 quotas for One Nation. This would suggest a strong Teal candidate would be the favorite to win a 7th Senate seat in Victoria.

In Queensland the task would be more difficult although not impossible, but in WA and SA it might be slightly easier than in the larger states. The votes won by Kate Chaney in Curtin and Climate 200 supported candidates in seats like Forrest would be encouraging for a potential Teal Senate candidate in Western Australia. Although no Teal was elected in South Australia, the vote in Grey for example, in which the Climate 200 candidate won 18745 votes suggest a strong candidate would have a good chance in the Senate in South Australia, particularly given the parlous state of the South Australian Liberal party.

Tasmania is harder to judge because of the Lambie factor, but for seven seats in Tasmania the quota would be very small, almost certainly less than 50000 votes. The performance of Andrew Wilkie in Clark and Peter George in Franklin suggests this should be achievable for a strong Teal candidate.

I also support increased Senate representation for the Territories. Given David Pocock’s success and the continuing failure of the Liberals to appeal to ACT voters this could create a further opportunity for a Senate success for a Teal candidate.

So, it is obviously possible for a Teal candidate to win one or more Senate seats at the next election. It would be possible, but more difficult, even if the size of the parliament is not increased.

What would they need to do?

The data makes it important that Teal candidates run in more, preferably all seats. This could be based on only notional campaigns in many seats because very few votes should be necessary in the more difficult seats.

The ACT experience suggests that high profile candidates would also be a distinct advantage. They don’t all need to be David Pocock, but they would need to attract attention in the seats without strong House candidates.

What would not be necessary is a party structure. The current informal processes should be sufficient if the level of support can be maintained.

I am not advocating that Climate 200 and the Teals should take this step

That is up to them and has risks as well as benefits.

However, the current state of the Liberal party in every state and the low level of support for the Nationals in most states make it an intriguing possibility.

Cindy Lou in Sydney

Sydney abounds in coffee and breakfast places, and some of the really nice ones are near where we stay, or close to venues we visited, such as The Roslyn Packer Theatre – Basket Brothers (brisket bowl and chicken tacos after arrival, lovely service), 8 Ounce (great toast – two grain slices with lots of butter and vegemite, terrific service, excellent prices) Toast (pork and fennel roll, mushroom toasty, good menu efficiency and smiles), Brix Beans (great coffee, good service, nice choice of food, but on this occasion, coffee was enough).

Two excellent finds – Cruise on the harbour, the opposite side to the opera house; and at the NSW Art Gallery new building. Cruise offers indoor and out door seating, and we chose the comfortable outdoor lounges. The service is terrific, the menu is varied and from our experience served in generous portions and delicious. The venue and the dishes will be on our list for a return visit. The oysters were $7 each instead of the $7.50 and more at other nearby restaurants. The eggplant and pasta dishes made excellent sharing dishes.

Mod. Dining at the gallery was another restaurant to which we would happily return. The seating is indoors but the building is light and airy. The menu is another plus, and it was easy to share the sate chicken skewers, and crispy eggplant. With these we chose jasmine rice. Another dish that looked very appetising was the pumpkin salad. The beverage menu was extensive, and we had jasmine and ginger tea.

Both restaurants are on our list for the next time we visit Sydney.

On our last night in Sydney, we ate at Clarence and V, a tiny restaurant in Clarence Street. Although the restaurant was quite noisy, the table size and shape made conversation relatively easy. The food was delicious and very reasonably priced. We shared a salad (crisp, crisp lettuce, cucumber and olive slices) and split yellow pea dip with large pieces of fresh crusty white bread. The meals we chose were eggplant with lamb, courgette flowers with a lovely sauce, fish with a delicious lentil accompaniment (replacing beef cheeks which did not appeal to me) and beef and crushed potatoes. The servings are small, but the flavours are big. The dessert was delicious – and sharing between two was a good decision. Mint tea was served at the end of the meal. The service was friendly and helpful, and the mint tea was really appreciated. i would return.

One evening we went to dinner a ferry trip from Circular Quay. We didn’t see the sunset, but the ride affords views of the Harbour Bridge and the Opera House. Upon arriving at our destination, the sky through the tress was a delightful accompaniment to drinks on the balcony.

Next week’s blog will include the magnificent exhibition Yolŋu power: the art of Yirrkala at the Art Gallery of NSW, and the excellent adaptation of Patricia Highsmith’s novel, The Talented Mr Ripley, at the Roslyn Packer Theatre.

Week beginning 24 September 2025

Laura Lippman Murder Takes a Vacation A Mrs Blossom Mystery, Faber and Faber Ltd, August 2025.

Thank you, NetGalley, for providing me with this uncorrected proof for review.

Mrs Blossom holds the fears of many whose route to the back of a plane is accompanied by the overwhelming feeling that they will not be welcome in the tiny space to be shared with other passengers. On this occasion, arriving early at check in as usual, she is rewarded with an upgrade. Her unfamiliar feeling of wellbeing on a plane is enhanced by her meeting with handsome and caring fellow passenger. However, this will be the last time she is afforded such a comfortable state of mind. The flight lands in Heathrow too late for her to make her connection to a Paris where she is to join her friend to cruise through France.

Muriel Blossom is a wonderful character with her amalgam of fears about her appearance and age, her robust willingness to put her detection skills to use and her interactions with the people she meets. At times she inclined to think the worst of them; at others she is keen to befriend a fellow traveller. At the same time as she is interacting with new acquaintances, her friendship with the multiple marrying Elinor is joyful, accepting and warm, painting this relationship as ideal, depicting everything a woman’s friendship should be.

There is enough ‘bite’ in this novel to avoid it being a ‘cozy’ mystery. Laura Lippman has brought Mrs Blossom, female friendships, humour, detection and intrigue together to make an extremely satisfying read. As in Dream Girl (2021) Lipmann’s Tess Monaghan takes second place to a new character and story line. Murder Takes a Vacation poses a successful interaction with Lippman’s famous character and a secondary character from Another Thing to Fall (2008). Lippmann’s ability to deliver a plot that, while providing only glimpses of Tess Monaghan, is again triumphant.

Jane Corry The Stranger in Room Six Penguin General UK -Fig Tree, Hamish Hamilton, Viking Penguin Life, Penguin Business, Penguin, June 2025.

Thank you, NetGalley, for providing me with this uncorrected proof for review.

This novel is difficult to put down, so much so, that I read it over a day with only enforced pauses. It begins with an intriguing prologue, and the pace after the gunshot at its conclusion only becomes faster. The stranger in room six begins the story telling. However, the main thrust of the narrative belongs to Belinda and Mabel. Belinda is a carer at Sunnyside Home for the Young at Heart; Mabel is an elderly resident. Belinda’s story begins fifteen years previously as she dispassionately observes her husband. Mabel begins her story during World War 2 with a tragedy that brings her as a fifteen-year-old to The Rectory, now Sunnyside. Both women have secrets, and both tell their stories with a mixture of satisfaction, relief, and trepidation. Their companiable story telling becomes dangerous when the stranger begins to impose her will on the information that is being gathered. See Books: Reviews for the complete review.

Thank you, NetGalley, for providing me with this uncorrected proof for review.

I thoroughly enjoyed reading the publishers’ accounts of their commitment to The Strand, and Alexander McCall’s Foreword. All demonstrated the enthusiasm and exactitude with which the short stories were chosen and the significance of the publication. I have mixed feelings about the short stories, some of which I found extremely clever as well as readable; others I did not warm to; and I missed being able to read an example of a modern Agatha Christie with its signatory clues that fox the most insightful reader. See Books: Reviews for the complete review.

Australian Politics

The Saturday Paper logo

September 20 – 26, 2025  |  No. 568

John Hewson The unravelling of the Liberal Party

Clearly, not everyone saw delusion in Jacinta Nampijinpa Price’s run for, and subsequent attacks on, the Liberal leadership.

Her actions have been embraced by the Murdoch mob, in particular the excitable team at Sky News. She is backed as ever by right-wing advocacy group Advance, and think tanks such as the Institute of Public Affairs and the Centre for Independent Studies.

The rush of blood to the conservative media’s head was triggered by Price’s recent statements about Indian migrants and her refusal to properly apologise, and then her failure to publicly support Sussan Ley as the Coalition leader, which led to her justifiable ouster from the shadow ministry.

Many, both within and beyond Canberra’s political sphere, see the senator for what she has been since entering politics – a negative, divisive and disloyal force, and particularly so since she ditched the Nationals and joined the Liberal Party. Her political ambitions really took flight with the prominent role she played – employed to full effect by former opposition leader Peter Dutton – in opposing the Indigenous Voice to Parliament referendum. Dutton then endorsed her aspirations with a role in his election campaign. It quickly soured, given her lack of political substance and her ill-considered utterances about MAGA and other Trumpist lines.

It was hard to explain her appointment to the shadow ministry in the first place – especially taking into account her controversial time on the Alice Springs Town Council. Price is not a team player – it’s always her career first, then the party. Moreover, she has no particular policy expertise or experience, certainly none to justify the defence industries portfolio she was given. I suppose Ley felt she had to give Price something, given the brouhaha with which she arrived, and the leader probably felt the new recruit would work better with Angus Taylor, given their declared leadership alliance and friendship. It was surely a strategic miscalculation, as it’s possible Taylor knows even less about the defence portfolio – having never contributed significantly on the most relevant issues.

Ley has at least now been able to correct the poor initial decision to appoint Price to the front bench.

With her comment on “mass migration”, Price was obviously seeking to capitalise on the anti-immigration sentiment of the recent marches and protests taking place both here and overseas. She did however, once again, show very poor judgement and a lack of compassion towards Indian migrants, whose support the Liberals will need in both city and country seats at future elections.

It was insensitive and demeaning to assume that Indians vote as a coordinated, homogeneous block. Perhaps the strong skew polling firm RedBridge Group noted among the community towards Labor at the last election owed to Dutton’s racism and generally poor campaign? These communities deserve respect, not cheap political shots.I imagine the other aspiring leaders – Hastie, Taylor or Tim Wilson spring to mind – are happy to let Price go on destabilising from the back bench. They are just sitting back like spiders in a web, waiting for their moment to strike.

Price’s attack on Indian migrants rekindled memories of the party’s mishandling of Chinese–Australian voters that cost it dearly in the past couple of elections. The electorate can infer from these incidents that there is a deep-seated racism in the Coalition. This point was made forcibly by the Gillard government’s trade minister Craig Emerson recently, as he suggested that these conservative parties “offer cover for bigots”. I fear this is closer to the mark than we’d care to believe. It’s worth noting that Price was speaking outside her portfolio, to which she had given completely inadequate attention – with all that’s going on, she could have issued a press release on defence every day, cheered on by her friends in the media.

This has been a destabilising episode for Ley, stirring talk of a challenge by the end of this year. I believe it is most unfortunate that Ley hasn’t been afforded a clear opportunity to do the job. I accept she hasn’t been inspirational or strategic but, like countless before her, she deserves a genuine chance. That said, if she wants to survive politically, she will need to do better than the anti-government, anti-welfare and amorphous speech she delivered at the think tank CEDA this week.

The current Coalition needs to learn the importance of discipline and teamwork rather than engaging in this persistent navel gazing.

The party’s sluggishness in conducting its policy reviews, and in announcing any new strategic direction or clear positions on so many pressing national issues, has created the image of a rudderless group more absorbed by internal squabbles than good policy. There has been a complete shambles over issues such as immigration, climate change and net zero, the latter ignoring the substance of the recently released climate risk assessment. The contribution of Andrew Hastie this week, in suggesting he would leave the front bench if the party sticks with its climate target, could not have been more ill-considered or ill-timed.

This Coalition is sadly and obviously not in any condition to govern – a fact clearly reflected in its devastating polls. Anthony Albanese would win again if an election were held now, and probably even more definitively. The primary vote for the Coalition in the most recent Newspoll collapsed to 27 per cent – the worst result in the poll’s history since 1985. The Labor primary vote was steady at 36 per cent, giving the government a commanding 58-42 two-party preferred lead, which is Albanese’s biggest margin since taking office.

This latest Price saga was likely an important contributor to the slide in the polls. Ley was seen to be slow in responding, especially given the clear breach of cabinet responsibilities. Ley waited surprisingly long to call on Price to apologise to the Indian diaspora, which in the end she had to do herself. Price became a particularly shambolic element of an unfolding Liberal mess, despite her protection team, led by former prime minister Tony Abbott – who last week described Price in this paper as “one of the few Liberal MPs with a proven ability to provide national leadership” – and his former chief of staff, Peta Credlin. One Liberal MP told The Sydney Morning Herald that Credlin’s soft interviews on Sky News are Price’s “safe space”.

The constraints on Ley and therefore her performance need to be recognised. She beat Taylor by only a small margin of four votes – depending in part on the support of senators whose parliamentary time has now ended. She also allowed the unsuccessful candidate for Bradfield to vote. Unfortunately, Ley’s staff are seemingly quite inexperienced, and closely associated with Alex Hawke, who apparently runs her office. This is a clear disadvantage given his history of factionalism in the New South Wales party, and broader ambitions. Price alleged that Hawke berated her staff, generating a heated argument, rather than Ley calling directly.

Ley is also disadvantaged by Abbott running amok across factions in the NSW party. He was instrumental in Price’s transfer from the Nationals. He is also clearly behind her ambitions, which to Abbott would mean building a hard-right conservative force in our politics, channelling the likes of Britain’s Nigel Farage, talked up by the cheer squad of Andrew Bolt, Rowan Dean and Paul Murray.

Ley’s reshuffle again emphasises an important weakness of the current Liberal Party, namely the absence of genuine talent with significant professional standing. Those days seem long gone as the party is simply not attracting such people – a sharp contrast with the candidates drawn to the independents movement. As a result, the shadow cabinet is appointed mostly on political and geographic considerations, meaning that inexperienced members have to learn on the job, forced to perform without particular compassion and commitment. For example, Price’s complex role combining defence industry and personnel with cybersecurity and science has been split between Melissa Price of Western Australia and Claire Chandler of Tasmania. It was also bordering on ridiculous to add Senator James Paterson to the leadership team. As the party’s campaign spokesman in the election, he showed an inability to expand on or explain the statements by the leaders.

I am sure, nevertheless, that Ley will expect, and hopefully get, more loyalty and discipline from her new team than she was getting before.

Even if the current leader were to be spilt, I don’t believe, given Jacinta Price’s total sellout of Indigenous Australia, that she could or should win, or indeed ever be given any meaningful portfolio in the future. Changing the jockey won’t make a winner if the horse is crook.

Three leadership challenges remain, for whoever is in the role. First, achieving genuine unity within the party and the Coalition. Second, policy credibility. Third, deep organisational reform. All three require consistent, coordinated and focused hard work with all back- and frontbenchers making their essential contributions. Sadly, as things stand, these efforts are not yet being made.

I imagine the other aspiring leaders – Hastie, Taylor or Tim Wilson spring to mind – are happy to let Price go on destabilising from the back bench. They are just sitting back like spiders in a web, waiting for their moment to strike. 

This article was first published in the print edition of The Saturday Paper on September 20, 2025 as “Price checked”.

The Guardian

Australia could be a ‘dumping ground’ for goods made for us with forced labour, anti-slavery tsar warns

Exclusive: Chris Evans says ‘blind spots’ in modern slavery laws means few prosecutions occur and some companies are ‘taking the mickey’ in their approach to reporting

Ben Doherty Mon 1 Sep 2025 12.25 AEST

Australia’s modern slavery laws are among the weakest in the developed world and the country risks becoming a “dumping ground” for goods made with forced labour, Australia’s first anti-slavery commissioner has said.

In a wide-ranging interview with Guardian Australia, the commissioner, Chris Evans – a former Labor senator and minister – said there were “blind spots” in Australia’s efforts that risked the country becoming a global laggard.

“Not only are we not keeping up to the standard of acceptable corporate responsibility,” he said of Australia’s Modern Slavery Act, “but we’re also now running the risk of being a dumping ground because of the fact that we have the lowest level of prevention of goods made with forced labour coming into our country.”

His comments come as a report by the UN special rapporteur on contemporary forms of slavery argued that migrants and vulnerable minorities “slip through the cracks” to be exploited in Australia.

The attorney general, Michelle Rowland, described modern slavery as “abhorrent” and said the government was committed to combating it.

Evans said jurisdictions comparable to Australia, including the US, Canada, or – soon – the EU had introduced import bans on goods made with, or strongly suspected of being made with, forced labour. No such ban exists in Australia.

Australia has one of the “weakest regimes in dealing with forced labour”, Evans said, arguing that companies making goods with forced labour on warning lists, and excluded from markets such as US, Canada or Europe, would seek to export to countries without import bans.

“We’re [Australia] at risk of becoming a dumping ground for goods that are designed for … wealthy western countries, but which may have serious issues with forced labour in their supply chains.”

Australia’s other most pressing “blind spot” was in low rates of identification and prosecution of offences occurring inside Australia, he said.

“Some people like to comfort themselves by thinking, well, that means we don’t have much of a problem here, but … that’s nonsense: what it means is we haven’t been very good at … identifying those people who are being exploited and secondly … there are real issues about prosecutions in Australia and the amount of time it takes to get a case to court.”

Walk Free’s Global Slavery Index estimates that there are about 41,000 people held in modern slavery in Australia.

The Guardian requested statistics from the commonwealth director of public prosecutions on modern slavery prosecutions. Data provided to the UN office of drugs and crime shows that in 2023 – the latest figures available – 352 people were “brought into formal contact with the police and/or criminal justice system because they have been suspected of, arrested for, or cautioned for trafficking in persons”.

Five people were prosecuted. Zero were convicted.

Evans said Australia’s Modern Slavery Act, introduced in 2018, was “light-touch” legislation and Australia had failed to progress from that “first tentative step”.

The act mandates only that companies turning over more than $100m a year issue modern slavery reports: it imposes no obligations to address risks.

There are no penalties for failing to report and no penalties for substandard reporting. It’s estimated that between 400 and 1,000 companies who are obliged to report on modern slavery in their practices or supply chains are refusing to do so.

Some companies are reporting comprehensively, Evans said: “Others quite frankly are taking the mickey, by putting in two pages of ‘we oppose modern slavery’ and that’s been regarded as sufficient to pass muster.”s

He argued that Australia’s modern slavery laws needed to move from a reporting mandate to a “due diligence” model, where companies were required to act to prevent modern slavery in their supply chains or business practices.

Evans said the introduction of penalties was similarly overdue.

In 2023 the former ombudsman Prof John McMillan led a review of Australia’s Modern Slavery Act. He found “no hard evidence that the Modern Slavery Act … has yet caused meaningful change for people living in conditions of modern slavery”.

Among his 30 recommendations was that the act be updated to include: an obligation that companies must address modern slavery risks in their supply chains; penalties for companies that fail to comply; and high-risk declarations for regions, factories or suppliers.

The government did not respond until December 2024 – accepting in full, part or principle 25 of the 30 recommendations – but many have not been implemented. The government released a consultation paper in July.

Rowland said Australia had “strong laws and a comprehensive response to combat modern slavery practices, such as human trafficking, slavery, and slavery-like practices”.

“The Albanese government is committed to continuing our efforts to strengthen our response,” she said.

This month the UN special rapporteur Prof Tomoya Obokata said he was “seriously concerned by the treatments of temporary migrant workers in Australia”, reporting “disturbing, sometimes very serious, patterns of exploitative practices by employers, labour hire companies and migration agents”.

Obokata highlighted the exploitation of asylum seekers and refugees; people with disabilities; temporary migrant workers such as those on the Pacific Australia labour mobility scheme (particularly those who had “disengaged” from it and were outside its protections); domestic workers in diplomatic households; and students visa-holders.

He said vulnerable and marginalised people were let down by Australia’s “patchwork” laws.

The government will respond to Obokata’s report at the human rights council in September.

I know Canberrans are passionate about protecting our climate by reducing emissions and transitioning our energy grid to renewables as quickly as possible.

That’s why I am excited to share with you that today, the Albanese Labor Government has taken another strong step forward on climate action by announcing an ambitious and achievable 2035 emissions reduction target of 62 – 70%.

This target range is based on expert advice including from the Climate Change Authority and puts Australia firmly on the path to net zero while protecting households and businesses from the burden of higher costs.

Today’s announcement isn’t just a target, it also includes a detailed Net Zero Plan which outlines exactly how we plan to achieve our target while also providing businesses and renewables investors the certainty that they need so they can play their key role in decarbonising our economy past 2030.

The Plan demonstrates how Australia can transition while:

  • growing the economy
  • reducing cost pressures on households and businesses
  • creating new jobs.

The Plan also identifies five priorities to guide our transition to net zero:

  • Clean electricity across the economy.
  • Lowering emissions by electrification and efficiency.
  • Expanding clean fuel use.
  • Accelerating new technologies.
  • Net carbon removals scaled up.

If you’re interested, you can read the Net Zero Plan or check out the finer detail in the sector emissions reductions plans we have released today here.

In our first three years in government, we’ve increased wind and solar capacity by 45%, enough to power over 6 million households, but we aren’t done yet. Now we’ll build on that success and pick up the pace.

We know that renewables are the cheapest form of new energy and today we’ve made another down payment to supercharge their rollout. We’ve announced $2 billion to deliver even more renewables and we are also setting up a new $5 billion Net Zero Fund to help industry do the heavy lifting in moving to clean energy.

Our responsibility as a government for all Australians is to balance ambition with practical delivery to cut emissions, create jobs and keep downward pressure on household bills. That’s exactly what this target does.

The target is affordable and achievable but most importantly, its ambitious. We are up for doing the hard work that comes on the other side of announcing this target because our future generations deserve that from us.

Only Labor leads from the front on climate action and renewable energy investment right across Australia, and today’s plan builds on our commitment to deliver climate action in a meaningful and responsible way.

Thanks for taking the time to read about this significant announcement and I look forward to engaging with Canberrans about this target and our broader plans to deliver net zero by 2050.

Political Cartoons Australia’s post

David Pope

Carrick Ryan posted on Facebook, referring back to his previous commentary on PM Anthony Albanese and the failure to meet with President Donald Trump…

Since I wrote this, Republican Congressmen and Women have threatened Australia with “consequences” for its recognition of Palestine, Department of Defence officials leaked private correspondence to the media in an effort to disrupt Albanese’s meeting with Xi, and Trump has threatened an Australian reporter… so no, I don’t think Australians have any interest in our Prime Minister being humiliated in the Oval Office any time soon…

Carrick Ryan 

13 July Facebook·

Albanese has tried to speak to Trump, and Trump has so far made no accommodation for him.

Personally, I don’t think the Australian people really want this meeting to happen.

I think they’ve seen Trump humiliate his allies in the Oval Office, they’ve seen him demonstrate his ignorance and disrespect towards every nationality he’s ever spoken about other than his own.

We don’t want to cringe as we watch our Prime Minister feature in one of the mad king’s moments of lunacy, or be used as a prop for some ulterior political motive.

We don’t want to have to see our representatives grovel at Nero’s court, and pretend that we can see the emperor’s clothes too. We don’t want to dignify this circus.

Because even if we did all that, what would it achieve?

Do we expect Trump to be swayed by reason? Are we appealing to his conscience? Even if he suddenly changed his mind, could we ever trust his capricious mood swings and unpredictable policy on the go? Would anything he say mean anything later?

Trump placed tariffs on our nation despite the fact the US has a trade surplus with us. Defying the entire justification he has provided for this stupefying global trade war.

He could have easily utilised our example to demonstrate his fairness to the world, and absolved us as one of the few who buy more from America than they sell… but he chose not to. He chose to punish the nation that has followed the US into every one of their wars since WWII.

So no… we don’t want to send someone to Washington to go and kiss the ring…

…instead, we shall speak to Beijing.

We’re not looking for new friends, but we’re still trying to figure out who our enemies are.

British Politics

The Conversation:

This week the UK news cycle has been dominated by the state visit of the US president, Donald Trump. Many of us will have held our breath. Not so much for the duration of Trump’s stay at Windsor Castle. But the summit with the prime minister and the press conference which followed were pregnant with the possibility for gaffes or discord. Trump seemed so dreamily charmed by his time with the Royals that he appeared to be benevolence itself. Sighs of relief all round at Chequers this weekend, one can only assume.

The Conversation

How I tracked the biggest hidden sources of forever chemical pollution in UK rivers – new study

Published here under Creative Commons licence.

Published: September 19, 2025 7.17pm AEST

Patrick Byrne

Disclosure statement

Patrick Byrne receives funding from the Natural Environment Research Council.

The amount of toxic “forever chemicals” flowing into the River Mersey in north-west England has reached some of the highest levels recorded anywhere in the world.

My team’s research links much of this contamination to old landfills, waste facilities and past industrial activity. Even if these chemicals were banned tomorrow, they would continue polluting our rivers for decades, possibly centuries.

But there is a path forward. We’ve developed a new method to track and prioritise the largest sources for clean-up, giving regulators a clearer picture of where to act first.

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), more commonly known as “forever chemicals”, are a large family of human-made chemicals found in everyday products like food packagingwater-repellent clothes and fire-fighting foams. They are valued for their ability to resist very high temperatures and to repel water and oil, but these same properties make them extremely persistent.

Once released, some PFAS could take thousands of years to break down. They accumulate in the environment, build up – with different compounds accumulating at different rates – inside the bodies of wildlife and people, and have been associated with harms to health. The most studied types have been linked to cancers, hormone disruption and immune system problems.

Last year, my research team discovered that the amount of two potentially cancer-causing PFAS chemicals washing off the land and into the Mersey was among the highest in the world. In our follow-on research, we travelled upstream to try and locate where these PFAS are coming from. But with hundreds of potential PFAS sources, how do we isolate the largest ones?

The secret is measuring something called the PFAS load – the total amount of PFAS flowing through the river at a given point, rather than just the concentration in the water.

Here’s why that matters: a small stream can have high concentrations but carry only a small total amount, while a large river with lower concentrations can be transporting far more PFAS overall. If we only look at concentration, we risk missing the really heavy polluters.

By measuring PFAS loads at multiple points along the Mersey system, we could see exactly where the largest increases occurred. That told us both the location and the scale of PFAS inputs.

We detected PFAS chemicals at 97% of our sample sites, even in supposedly pristine streams draining from the Peak District national park. But the big breakthroughs came when we matched the largest PFAS load increases to specific areas.

PFBS (a type of PFAS) was coming in huge amounts from land draining old landfills in the Glaze Brook watershed near Leigh, west of Manchester. PFOA, a globally banned and cancer-causing PFAS, appeared to originate from a waste management facility on the River Roch, north of Manchester. PFOS, another banned PFAS, was entering the River Bollin, with strong evidence pointing to historic firefighting foam use at Manchester Airport.

What’s most striking to me is that all these sources are rooted in the past – old landfills, waste sites or historic industrial use. These chemicals are no longer in production, but they are still escaping into the environment, decades later.

This is where PFAS load measurements make a real difference. Instead of chasing the highest concentrations – which might lead to cleaning up small streams that contribute little overall – we can target the sites releasing the largest total amounts of PFAS into our rivers.

It’s a simple idea with major implications. In a world where environmental regulators face tight budgets and limited monitoring capacity, knowing exactly which sites are the biggest sources is vital.

The Mersey is just one example. Around the world, PFAS contamination follows a similar pattern: numerous potential sources scattered across the landscape, many of them historical. The chemicals’ extreme persistence means they will continue cycling through rivers, soils and wildlife for generations unless active steps are taken to remove or contain them.

Our latest study shows that measuring PFAS load can help solve one of the toughest challenges in managing chemical pollution: working out where to start. By identifying and prioritising the biggest sources, regulators have a realistic chance of reducing the flow of forever chemicals into our rivers – and perhaps one day, making that nickname a little less true.

Liverpool John Moores University provides funding as a member of The Conversation UK.

American Politics

Paper Clip Protest Sep 20 

On Thursday, E. Jean Carroll started it: Paper Clip Protest.

“Comely Reader! I suggest we all start wearing the paper clip. Subtler than a red hat, more powerful as a CONNECTION,” she wrote, explaining they were also worn during World War II as a sign of resistance against the Nazis.

Norwegian teachers and students wore paper clips to signal their opposition to Nazi occupation. They attached them to their lapels and wore them as jewelry, a symbol of solidarity binding them together as paper clips did with papers. It was a quiet act of defiance, expressing that Norwegians remained united against Nazi rule.

Friday, when I signed on to tape the #SistersInLaw Podcast, Jill Wine Banks had a clip delicately attached to the collar of her shirt. It made me smile. In that moment, I knew E. Jean was onto something. Our defiance can and must be loud and public at this point. But the quiet symbol of solidarity on someone’s collar when you walk into a crowded room? Genius. And much better than a red hat.

You probably have a paper clip in your desk or junk drawer that you can put on straight away. You can be a subtle signal of support for people who need that right now. You can be a conservation starter. Jill tells me she’s having special paper clips made for the occasion—very fitting for a woman known for wearing pins—and has promised to send me one.

Small efforts can bear fruit when we’re all in on them. I’m going to find a paper clip before I head out to the farmers’ market.

We’re in this together,

Joyce

Pablo Picasso Portrait of a Woman 1940, also known as Portrait of Dora Marr Royan, France – oil on paper on canvas

Cindy Lou enjoys her return to 86

I t seems so long since I ate at 86 – far too long, and I shall certainly not leave so much time before my next visit. I forgot to photograph the delicious, charred corn with togarashi cream and parmesan, but managed to photograph the remainder of the meal before it was devoured. It was a favourite menu – fragrant crispy eggplant with sichuan chilli caramel, pumpkin tortellini with burnt butter and sage sauce, and broccolini with hazel nuts. And, the delightful orange blossom cocktail was back.

Cindy Lou likes Ginger and Spice for its lunch menu – something familiar and something new

Eggplant, potato and capsicum

Sweet and sour chicken

Kebaba is a casual Turkish outdoor cafe in Civic. Today we had zucchini fritters and a kebab.

Tonight, I was at Llewellyn Hall and wanted to add the story below before posting.

John Galloway PAINTER AM

Mozart’s Requiem performed by the Canberra Symphony Orchestra was dedicated to John Painter AM. A moving speech was made before the performance. I was fortunate in knowing John as a lovely, gentle neighbour as well as the man of the accolades he so deservedly received in the speech.

Obituary from the Sydney Morning Herald

John Galloway Painter AM, one of Australia’s most esteemed musical figures, died peacefully surrounded by close family on September 13 at the age of 92. John retained his easy sense of humour and gentlemanly nature throughout the short illness leading to his death.

John’s express wishes were for a direct committal with no funeral service.

A tribute concert will be held at the Sydney Conservatorium of Music on Sunday October 12 at 3pm. Tickets will be available from Wednesday September 24 through the Conservatorium’s online box office.

Published by The Sydney Morning Herald on Sep. 20, 2025.

Week beginning 17 September 2025

Helene Harrison The Many Faces of Anne Boleyn Interpreting Image and Perception Pen & Sword | Pen & Sword History, July 2025.

Thank you, NetGalley and Pen & Sword for providing me with this uncorrected proof for review.

Helene Harrison’s forensic approach to discovering Anne Boleyn is a remarkable enterprise, and one that provides a welcome addition to the myriads of interpretations that have already been written. Harrison’s perceptiveness is an asset in considering the immense range of sources she investigates. These are primary and secondary sources, all of which she appraises with almost a gimlet eye. Her understanding of other writers’ and film/television makers’ interpretations is acute, critical at times, but recognising the importance of others’ contribution to creating an understanding of this elusive woman. That Anne Boleyn is elusive can, of course, be questioned. After all, she has been the subject of so many books, films, and television series. However, where so much has been partisan, it is useful to try to stand back, look at the material and, as Harrison has done, investigate. See Books: Reviews for the complete review.

Suzann Fortin The Codebreaker’s Daughter Embla Books, July 2025.

Thank you, NetGalley, for providing me with this uncorrected proof for review.

The Codebreaker’s Daughter is not just another book in which women’s impact on the work at Bletchley Park is central to the plot. Hana is a Japanese speaker and an expert at solving puzzles that involve language skills. These she perfects with her father over cross word puzzles, and it is this relationship and her linguistic skills that bring her into Bletchley Park, a world of secrets and danger. See Books: Reviews for the complete review.

As I review so many books published by Pen and Sword, and find them valuable sources of topics that often highlight feminist themes, I thought it worthwhile publishing the following information about the publisher, although it refers only briefly to the social history themes that I find so gratifying. It is interesting that the publisher is renowned for its military historical titles, an imprint taken over from Leo Cooper, husband of Jilly Cooper.

Pen and Sword Publications

The origin of Pen and Sword Books is closely linked with its sister company, the Barnsley Chronicle; one of the UK’s oldest provincial newspapers – established in 1858 – and one of the few weeklies still in private ownership.

The first books published by the company were in response to public demand following of a series of articles published in the newspaper:- Dark Peak Aircraft Wrecks told the story of crash sites in the Dark Peak area of the Peak District National Park, and a further weekly feature on the history of two Kitchener battalions, known as the Barnsley Pals, aroused a thirst for more information. Over the years these books have been reprinted a number of times and have collectively sold around 20,000 copies.

Following on from the success of Dark Peak Wrecks and Barnsley Pals books, a number of local history paperbacks were produced along with a series of battlefield guide books. Battleground Europe proved immediately successful and as more and more titles were produced the company made the decision to launch a book publishing arm of the group.

The company acquired the Leo Cooper military history imprint and “Pen and Sword” was born. Leo Cooper, the husband of the famous novelist Jilly, had established a strong reputation for publishing military history titles and had some famous books in his list. With the Leo Cooper imprint and its backlist, Pen and Sword became established as one of the UK’s leading military history publishers.

Over recent years Pen and Sword has continued to grow and has added new imprints to its core area of military history, as well as publishing the majority of its catalogue digitally in eBook format. Pen and Sword specializes in all areas of military history, naval and maritime, aviation, local history, genealogy, social history, transport, discovery and exploration, archaeology, nostalgia and true crime. In 2017, a new lifestyle imprint named White Owl was launched, which publishes books on areas such as health and diet, hobbies and sport, gardening and wildlife and space.

With over 350 books published every year, Pen and Sword has established itself as a specialist book publisher.

Pen and Sword CUS Footer Logo

© 2025 Pen and Sword Books. All Rights Reserved.

US Contact Info
Pen and Sword Books
c/o Casemate Publishers,
1950 Lawrence Road
Havertown, PA 19083
t: (610) 853-9131
e: casemate@casematepublishers.com

Tracey Emin’s Largest-Ever Exhibition Is Landing In London Next Year – And It Will Display ‘My Bed’ As Well As Never-Before-Seen Pieces

‘A Second Life’ is Tracey Emin’s largest exhibition, and you’ll be able to catch it when it lands at London’s Tate Modern in February.

 Jack Saddler – Senior Staff Writer • 8 September, 2025

Tracey Emin’s career has spanned over 40 years, and her work makes her one of the recognisable names in contemporary British art. And her achievements are to be recognised with her largest-ever exhibition, which lands at London’s Tate Modern next year.

Titled Tracey EminA Second Life, the giant exhibition opens at the Tate at the start of next year, with a mix of her most well-known pieces as well as works that have never been shown to the public before.

Tracey Emin: A Second Life at the Tate Modern

Running at the Tate Modern between February 26 – August 31, 2026, Tracey Emin’s landmark A Second Life exhibition shows more than 90 works, with many you’ll likely recognise, including the two pieces that are at the heart of the exhibition, Exorcism of the Last Painting I Ever Made 1996 and the Turner Prize-nominated My Bed 1998, which documents the artist’s ‘recovery from an alcohol-fuelled breakdown’. Elsewhere in the exhibition, you’ll see works from Emin from the 2020s, including her I Followed You Until The End 2023 statue stood outside the Tate.

At the beginning of the exhibition, visitors will see pieces from her first solo exhibition, My Major Retrospective, featuring tiny photographs of her paintings she completed at art school, as well as her six-minute video storytelling piece, Why I Never Became A Dancer 1995, which recounts her time growing up in Margate.

The title of the exhibition references Emin addressing her own ‘second life’, with the artist addressing her experience of cancer, surgery, and disability in the exhibition, with her sculpture Ascension 2024 exploring her relationship with her body following surgeries for bladder cancer, which is also adressed with stills from a new documentary that will premiere at the Tate that shows the stoma and urostomy bag Emin now lives with.

Speaking on the exhibition, Dame Tracey Emin said: “I’m very excited about having a show at Tate Modern. For me, it’s one of the greatest international contemporary art museums in the world and it’s here in London. I feel this show, titled ‘A second Life’, will be a bench mark for me. A moment in my life when I look back and go forward. A true celebration of living.”

‘Tracey Emin: A Second Life’ is landing at the Tate Modern on February 26, 2026 and will run until August 31, 2026. Find out more about it here.

Steve Shirley countered sexism by founding her own company

The refugee, entrepreneur and philanthropist died on August 9th, aged 91

She learned the ropes pretty fast at Computer Developments Ltd. In 1959, she had to. Not so much the coding, with paper and pencil at her desk, until it could be punched up and sent to the computer; to anyone as fond of maths as she was, that was just fun. No, she also learned to stand against the wall in case a male colleague tried to pinch her bottom. And if she wanted to make a sensible point at a meeting, and was bluntly told it was nothing to do with her, she had to silently accept it. The day after that particular slight, however, she handed in her notice and decided to create a company herself. One just for women.

Stephanie Shirley knew exactly what she wanted. A company employing university-educated women, who were otherwise laid off when they got married or became pregnant. A job, coding and inputting data, which they could do from home, with flexible hours and on piecework, to allow for looking after children or elderly parents. A company without the top-down “Do this, jump here” attitude of male bosses, but instead working in teams, eventually with shared ownership. She called it “Freelance Programmers”, and it would sell software.

That in itself caused male sniggering. No one would buy software in 1962; it was given away free with hardware. And of course no one would buy it from a woman. Try again, dear. (You could always recognise ambitious women, she said, because their heads were flat from being patted patronisingly.) Nonetheless, she started her company from her dining table with a mere £6 in capital. By the 1990s, when it was floated, it employed 8,500 people; by 2000 it was valued at $3bn. Its management-control protocols had been adopted by NATO, and it had programmed the black-box flight recorder for Concorde. As for the woman with her back against the wall, by 2017 she was a dame and a Companion of Honour, both for services to IT and for giving away the fortune she had made.

Much of that success lay in cunning. Because married female graduates were ignored by male employers, she had her pick of the best, all mustard-keen to work, and needing only a telephone to get started. Of 300 employees initially recruited, 297 were women. She disguised the scattered, domestic character of her workforce by offering fixed prices. When male clients called, she played a tape recording of efficient typing down the line to suggest a busy office, not her kitchen. Wiliest of all, she began to sign off letters to potential clients not as “Stephanie” but as “Steve”. That was her family nickname, one she liked much better, and responses shot up when she began to use it. So did her delight when, having arranged a meeting, she would walk into a room full of men who were expecting a he, not a she. When they had recovered from assuming she had come to make their tea, they increasingly agreed to do business with her.

This was not the first time she had changed her name. Before she married Derek Shirley in 1959, she was Stephanie Brook. But before that she was Vera Buchthal, who had arrived at Liverpool Street station in 1939, five years old and crying for her lost favourite doll, as one of 10,000 mostly Jewish children brought to England from Germany and Austria under the Kindertransport programme. That start in life marked her ever afterwards. Because kind people had saved her, she was going to make very sure that hers was a life worth saving. She would fritter none of it away.

That was why she snubbed the chance of university, though she was so brilliant at mathematics that she had to go to a boys’ school to study it properly. Instead she took a degree in it after six years of evening classes, while she worked at Dollis Hill Research Centre. (Another personal ambition was never to be poor again.) At Dollis Hill she helped devise electronic telephone exchanges and worked on Ernie, the computer that randomly chose the winning holders of Premium Bonds. At CDL she found even more rewarding work, developing software for the ICT 1301, one of the first mass-produced transistor computers. She created and moulded “Flossie” almost as if it were a child.

Coping with a real child, though, could be much more problematic. She seemed to have perfected the brand-new idea of work-life balance (helped, in her case, by a wonderfully encouraging husband). But it rapidly became impossible. Her only child Giles, at first a contented baby, suddenly at two and a half stopped talking and became unmanageable. He was diagnosed as severely autistic. At puberty he developed epilepsy, and became so violent that more than once she considered family suicide. For years she struggled with depression, even as her company boomed.

The tragedy of Giles convinced her that money was no use if it simply sat there. It had to be spread about. Before she retired in 1993 she therefore gave most of her stake in the company to her staff, ultimately making 70 millionaires. With much of the rest she gradually set up centres where autistic young people like Giles could be cared for, understood, even prepared for work, in an atmosphere as loving as she had tried to give him. The first, a supported living centre called Autism at Kingwood, opened in 1994 with Giles as the first resident. He died only four years later of an epileptic seizure, but he was happy there.

Most of her money went to autism causes, including Autistica and the National Autistic Society. But she did not forget her first love, computing. In 2001 she became a founding donor of the Oxford Internet Institute, which was set up to consider its social and ethical implications. Too many people, she believed, were afraid of new tech. She embraced it wholeheartedly, AI and all; so should they. The only thing to fear was wasting time, for who knew what opportunities might open up tomorrow? One day she had been playing in Vienna, the next on a train, the next on a ship to a new land; one day the butt of a roomful of men, the next her own master, undaunted, and climbing to the top of the tree. ■

The article above appeared in the Obituary section of the print edition under the headline “Steve Shirley” From the September 6th, 2025, edition.

Recollect – Bill and Bev Wood Exhibition

Bob McMullan launched this splendid exhibition. The art collection was exciting in its variety and connections to Canberra artists, and Bill and Beverly’s wide range of activities throughout Bill’s time in the ACT House of Assembly. Somehow, whatever these responsibilities beyond Bill’s commitment to the arts may have encompassed, art and adding to their collection found a place. As well as the art, a timeline of photographs and a collection of political badges, made a collection well worth visiting.

Thank you, Beverly Wood, for providing me with the photo of Rocking Rooster by Catherine Nix.

American Politics

Heather Cox Richardson from Letters from an American <heathercoxrichardson@substack.com> September 14, 2025

 President Donald J. Trump has been trying to remove Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook from the board of governors, alleging she lied on a mortgage application by claiming two homes as primary residences, which could garner a lower interest rate. Yesterday Chris Prentice and Marisa Taylor of Reuters reported that documents show that, in fact, Cook told the lender who provided a mortgage that a property in Georgia for which she was obtaining a loan would be a “vacation home.”

It appears the documents that director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency Bill Pulte used to accuse her of mortgage fraud were standardized forms that her personal application specifying the house was a second home overrode. It also appears that Cook never applied for a primary residence tax exemption for the Georgia home and that she referred to the home on official documents as a “2nd home.”

In contrast, Reuters reported last week that unlike Cook, Pulte’s own father and stepmother claimed primary residence tax exemptions for two homes in different states. When that news broke, one of the towns in which they reside removed their primary residence exemption and charged them for back taxes.

Trump hoped to use the allegations against Cook to advance his control of the Federal Reserve. Now the revelation that those allegations appear to be false highlights the degree to which this administration is attempting to achieve control of the country by pushing a false narrative and getting what its officers want before reality catches up. Senator Joe McCarthy (R-WI) pioneered this technique in the 1950s when he would grab media attention with outrageous statements and outright lies that destroyed lives, then flit to the next target, leaving fact checkers panting in his wake. By the time they proved he was lying, the news cycle had leaped far ahead, and the corrections got nowhere near the attention the lies had.While McCarthy eventually went down in disgrace, the right wing adopted his techniques of controlling politics by creating a narrative. Spin turned into a narrative that denigrated opponents as anti-American, and then into the attempt to construct a fictional world that they could make real so long as they could convince voters to believe in it. In 2004, a senior advisor to President George W. Bush told journalist Ron Suskind that people like him—Suskind—lived in “the reality-based community”: they believed people could find solutions based on their observations and careful study of discernable reality. But, the aide continued, such a worldview was obsolete.“

That’s not the way the world really works anymore,” the aide said. “We are an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors…and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.”

But once you have untethered the political narrative from reality, you are at the mercy of anyone who can commandeer that narrative.

In the wake of the murder of right-wing activist Charlie Kirk in Utah on Wednesday, the radical right is working to distort the country’s understanding of what happened. Long before any information emerged about who the shooter was, the president and prominent right-wing figures claimed that “the Left,” or Democrats, or just “THEY,” had assassinated Kirk.

White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller posted an attack on his political opponents on social media: “There is an ideology that has steadily been growing in this country which hates everything that is good, righteous and beautiful and celebrates everything that is warped, twisted and depraved. It is an ideology at war with family and nature. It is envious, malicious, and soulless. It is an ideology that looks upon the perfect family with bitter rage while embracing the serial criminal with tender warmth. Its adherents organize constantly to tear down and destroy every mark of grace and beauty while lifting up everything monstrous and foul. It is an ideology that leads, always, inevitably and willfully, to violence—violence against those [who] uphold order, who uphold faith, who uphold family, who uphold all that is noble and virtuous in this world. It is an ideology whose one unifying thread is the insatiable thirst for destruction.”

But in fact, the alleged shooter was not someone on the left. The alleged killer, Tyler Robinson, is a young white man from a Republican, gun enthusiast family, who appears to have embraced the far right, disliking Kirk for being insufficiently radical.

Rather than grappling with reality, right-wing figures are using Kirk’s murder to prop up their fictional world. Briefly, they claimed Robinson had been “radicalized” in college. Then, when it turned out he had spent only a single semester at a liberal arts college before going to trade school, MAGA pivoted to attack those who allegedly had celebrated Kirk’s death on social media.This morning, Miller posted: “In recent days we have learned just how many Americans in positions of authority—child services, law clerks, hospital nurses, teachers, gov[ernmen]t workers, even [Department of Defense] employees—have been deeply and violently radicalized. The consequence of a vast, organized ecosystem of indoctrination.”

Today, billionaire Elon Musk, who just months ago was a key figure in the White House, reposted a spreadsheet of “people who’ve said vile things” about Kirk’s murder. Over the list, he wrote: “They are the ones poisoning the minds of our children.” “So far, teachers and professors are by far the most represented,” the author of the list wrote.

Across the country, educators have been suspended or fired for posting opinions on social media that commented on Kirk’s death in ways officials deemed inappropriate. Legal analyst Asha Rangappa noted that “Americans are being conditioned to be snitches on their fellow citizens who don’t toe a party line on what is ‘allowed’ to be expressed. And employers are going along. It’s the new secret police.”

The deliberate attempt to create a narrative centering around “us” and “them” and to mobilize violence against that other was on display today when Musk told a giant anti-immigrant rally in the United Kingdom: “You’re in a fundamental situation here…where whether you choose violence or not, violence is coming to you. You either fight back or you die. You either fight back or you die. And that’s the truth.”

Of course, that is not the truth. It is a classic case of dividing the world into friends and enemies—a tactic suggested by Nazi political theorist Carl Schmitt—and inciting violence against newly identified enemies by claiming it is imperative to preempt them from using violence against your friends. Miller has vowed to use the power of the government not against the far right, where the violence that killed Kirk appears to have originated, but against MAGA’s political enemies. Flipping victims and offenders, he called his political opponents “domestic terrorists” and warned: “[T]he power of law enforcement under President Trump’s leadership will be used to find you, will be used to take away your money, take away your power, and, if you’ve broken the law, to take away your freedom.”

Where that kind of rhetoric takes a society showed on the Fox News Channel’s Fox & Friends Friday, when host Brian Kilmeade suggested the way to address homelessness was through “involuntary lethal injection. Or something. Just kill them.” When asked “why did we have to get to this point,” he answered: “we’re not voting for the right people.”

And that’s the heart of it. The radical right is frustrated because a majority continues to oppose them. According to Elliott Morris of Strength in Numbers, Trump’s job approval rating is just 42.3% with 53.6% disapproving, and more people disapprove of all of his policies than approve of them. Unable to control the country through the machinery of democracy when it operates fairly and afraid voters will turn them out in 2026, Republicans are working to make the system even more rigged than it already is: just yesterday, Missouri lawmakers approved a mid-decade gerrymander to turn one of the state’s two Democratic seats into a Republican one.

Right now, Trump and his loyalists control all three branches of government, but Trump is not delivering what his supporters believe his fictional vision of his presidency promised. Trump telegraphed great strength and vowed he could end Russia’s war against Ukraine with a single phone call, for example. When he failed to get any buy-in at all from Russia’s president Vladimir Putin for his proposals, Trump threatened to impose strong new sanctions against Russia. This afternoon he backed away from that altogether, saying he would issue sanctions on Russia only after all NATO nations stopped buying oil from Russia and placed 50% to 100% tariffs on China. “This is not TRUMP’S WAR (it would never have started if I was President!), it is Biden’s and Zelenskyy’s WAR,” he posted.This latest retreat from his threats against Russia after all his previous empty threats makes Trump’s claims of strength ring hollow. Russia is increasing its attacks on Ukraine, and today NATO member Romania scrambled jets when a Russian drone breached its airspace. Polish and NATO aircraft were deployed today to protect Polish airspace as well.

As Trump’s narrative falters on this and so many other fronts, MAGA is moving to the violence of the far right to achieve what he cannot. In that, they are fueled by the right-wing disinformation machine that is whitewashing Kirk’s racism, sexism, and attacks on those he disagreed with and instead portraying Kirk simply as a Christian motivational speaker attacked by a rabid left wing. Trump’s vow to award Kirk the nation’s highest civilian honor, the Presidential Medal of Freedom, posthumously reinforces that image.

The refusal of Republican lawmakers to challenge MAGA’s creation of its own reality has opened the way for believers to try to put that world into place through violence. Their victory would end the rule of law on which the United States was founded and base the government on the whims of an authoritarian cabal.

It would make the United States a country in which people who stand in the way of the regime—people like Lisa Cook—would be at the mercy of hostile officials who allege they are committing crimes in order to get rid of them.—

Notes:https://www.reuters.com/world/us/fed-governor-cook-declared-her-atlanta-property-vacation-home-documents-show-2025-09-12/https://www.reuters.com/world/us/bill-pulte-accused-fed-governor-lisa-cook-fraud-his-relatives-filed-housing-2025-09-05/https://kyivindependent.com/romania-scrambles-jets-poland-closes-airport-over-russian-drone-alerts/https://www.wsj.com/world/these-charts-show-how-putin-is-defying-trump-by-escalating-airstrikes-on-ukraine-f7eee47b?mod=hp_lead_pos5https://www.politico.com/news/2025/08/26/clearly-a-low-moment-u-s-india-relationship-sours-as-new-tariffs-kick-in-00527196https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2025/09/stephen-miller-charlie-kirk-tyler-robinson-extreme-rhetoric-id/https://www.gelliottmorris.com/p/datahttps://www.npr.org/2025/09/12/nx-s1-5537977/redistricting-midterms-trump-missourihttps://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-says-will-posthumously-award-charlie-kirk-presidential-medal-fre-rcna230581Bluesky:atrupar.com/post/3lypzw476j723wartranslated.bsky.social/post/3lypphezqak2spaleofuture.bsky.social/post/3lyqfcyxgjk2ajsweetli.bsky.social/post/3lyqs7kehqc22asharangappa.bsky.social/post/3lyre7fpuzc2hthe-ronin.bsky.social/post/3lypnusdo5s2hclairewillett.bsky.social/post/3lyqpmvctj225

Playwright and dramaturg Tom Wright – whose adaptation TROY is on at Malthouse Theatre – loves the ephemeral nature of his chosen art form. By Anna Snoekstra.

Playwright Tom Wright on the purpose of creativity

“I was swimming alone at Whale Beach and I got caught in a rip and died,” playwright Tom Wright tells me. He didn’t really die on that beach 25 years ago – after all, he is zooming with me from a tiny back room at Malthouse Theatre, where he is in rehearsals with director Ian Michael for the production of TROY.

“In my personal mythology, I died,” he explains. “I somehow managed not to panic and floated my way into safer waters. I got back to the beach and my legs were like jelly and I crawled, literally crawled, back to my towel. I wasn’t pompous enough to think that I’d been returned for a purpose or any of that Hollywood stuff.”

Wright’s near-death experience reinforced his decision to live “an irresponsible life”. He is highly aware that he comes from security and privilege and decided that to live without assets or property was the ultimate privilege.  

“I’ve lived as a grasshopper and not enough as an ant,” he says. “That came from a sense of this precariousness of what it is to be alive and what it is to share and make. It made me feel like, oh yes, it’s all right. Everything now is just a bonus.”

TROY is Wright’s seventh retelling of a classical text – others include The Odyssey, The Women of Troy, Oresteia and The Lost Echo – and it’s easy to see how mythic narratives frame his experience of the world.

Wright is artistic associate at Belvoir St Theatre in Sydney but considers himself a “Melburnian in exile”. His family has been in Victoria since the 1840s, and he was brought up in Russell Street in the CBD in the late 1960s. “My father had grown up on an apple orchard in regional Victoria and as the result of an accident, could no longer run the property,” he says. “Something like Dick Whittington, he had to come to the city to make his living. My mother came from an old Melbourne family full of socialists and radical theorists. Their curiosity and their citizenship were instinctive and tribal. You know, I’ve been away from Melbourne for nearly a quarter of a century, but the bluestone runs deeply in my veins.”

Comparing Melbourne with Sydney, Wright quotes late Australian playwright Jack Hibberd, who observed the differences between Australia’s largest cities. “Sydney was founded by the English in the cultural sense; even its penal convict relationship is an English thing,” Wright says. “It’s also more English in the sense that it’s mercantile, obsessed with trade, obsessed with value, obsessed with your role in the marketplace.

“Because of the gold rush and a whole range of different things, Melbourne is a Scots–Irish city. It comes from the Celtic diaspora more than the Anglo diaspora.” Wright believes Melbourne to be a hard nut to crack if you weren’t born here, and says it can be highly unwelcoming to outsiders.

In Sydney, he says, no one cares what school you went to or who your grandfather was. “They just want your value in terms of your ability to make money. And it’s great when you’re exciting and on the way up the mountain, but it’s deeply lonely when you’re on the other side. Whereas Melbourne, your tribe and the group of friends that you make in your vital decades remain your soulmates for the rest of your life. It’s a deeply safe space, at its best. I’m always happy when I come home. The sky feels familiar.”

Wright’s family valued curiosity above creativity. This is a value he still carries with him. He prizes articulacy, believing it to be the most generous trait you can have. While we speak, Wright works hard to decentralise himself from the narrative. He talks at length about director Ian Michael, about the nature of theatre in Australia, about war, privilege and cultural memory. He quotes famous plays, directors and poets many times. But getting him talking about his childhood, or journey as a writer, is difficult.

I can tell that the dodging and weaving is intentional on his part. His interests lie in the work he’s creating and the voices he is attempting to put centrestage through his retellings. I ask him about his growth as a creative – he thinks the word “creative” is overused. He quotes King Lear – “nothing will come of nothing” – and says that he doesn’t create, he reimagines.

He tells me he didn’t set out to be a playwright. He fell into theatre, first acting and then dramaturgy, because his girlfriend was studying it. “It’s the classic manifestation of privilege,” he says. “I cannot emphasise enough the privilege of being a multigenerational, white, English-speaking Australian and the safety that it gives you. Although I was the first person in my family to go to university, I never felt unworthy.” “People think that the purpose of being creative is to live forever, but you’ll end up just a forgotten statue battered by the desert winds.”

Although his family was uninterested in his burgeoning career on the stage, Wright’s deep sense of security never faltered. His career unfolded naturally, beginning with one-man shows monologuing death row cases and evolving with a long-term collaborative relationship with Barrie Kosky that culminated in an eight-hour production of Ovid’s Metamorphoses. He is now one of the country’s most acclaimed playwrights: his work tours the globe and has earnt him multiple Helpmann and Green Room awards as well as the Nick Enright Prize for Playwriting.

“When I was a young man, I callously thought that I was ‘lucky’, to use that great Australian word,” he says. “Now I realise I wasn’t lucky, I was privileged. But it took me a long time to see that. Sometimes I wonder about over-articulate white men in our society and their endless obsession with how smart they are. It feels to me like pages of the newspaper and the internet, or any social forum, are just full of men who have been conditioned by thousands of years to be listened to, still insisting on their right to be right. I’d like my right to be wrong.”

Listening is one thing, hearing is another, he says. “I feel like I’m getting better at hearing when I do listen.”

This connects to a broader shift in contemporary Australian theatre. “At the moment, it strikes me that we’re going through a phase where the director fulfils a facilitator role more than a visionary role,” he says. Wright sees a shift away from the idea of the auteurist visionary director, largely because of mistrust around the ego and power imbalances that often come with it.

In its place, a collaborative model of theatre is thriving, allowing rooms to be safer, more communicative and diverse. Wright is all for this model, finding the shift “exciting”. However, he is also aware that something can be lost, because there are fewer opportunities for people who genuinely want to go out on a limb. “So we’re making better, general quality work, but I would suggest that we’re possibly making fewer productions that are genuinely extraordinary,” he says. “Sometimes you pay for your cultural safety with cultural timidity. And at the moment, I feel like we’re going through a consolidation of what it is to be a nation, what it is to write plays, what it is to make theatre.”

In Wright’s view, Ian Michael, the director of TROY, possesses that genuinely extraordinary visionary quality. Michael originally worked in the box office at Malthouse, selling tickets to previous plays of Wright’s. After a swift career rise, he directed a revival of Wright’s adaptation of Joan Lindsay’s Picnic at Hanging Rock at Sydney Theatre Company, and Wright is thrilled to be working with him again.

“As a Noongar man and as an emerging leader in the Noongar and Indigenous communities across the country, Ian’s work cannot escape the prism of a postcolonial discourse,” Wright says. “TROY is a piece about Ukraine and it’s a piece about Gaza, but it never mentions them. It’s about war. It’s thinking philosophically about what war is and how war works for us, inside our stories and inside our mythologies.”

Wright believes there is great power in the act of retelling myths. He sees it as a way for Australians to learn about themselves as a nation: their strengths, weaknesses and prejudices. But he says that as an immature postcolonial society, Australia struggles with its retellings.

“We either get cultural cringe and try to be like the northern hemisphere model of what it is to make art and literature, and we imitate that,” he says. “It feels like we’re still trapped in that cycle and will be until our reconciliation project moves further on. Or we get adolescent in our insistence on our own novelty. And neither of these options feel particularly satisfactory to me. So, I like the mythic and I like the historical and I like the act of retelling, as opposed to telling.”

Wright respects the art of theatre as an act of resistance against capitalism. He loves its ephemeral nature. “It strikes me that we live in an age where everything is commodified. Our lives and our memories and our intellectual property and the data of our phones is now something that’s passed around in a marketplace,” he says. “But there are occasionally some moments where genuine community can still take place, where a group of people in the city can sit in a darkened room and hear again a story from thousands of years ago, and no one can really commodify that moment.

“The fact that it’s very hard to make money out of theatre is its curse and its blessing. It resists being continually colonised by neo-capitalism. Yes, obviously there are people making money out of commercial theatre, but I’m talking about these kinds of moments. And again, this is the Melburnian in me coming out, is that I value the way in which, in this day and age, frankly, going to a show on a Wednesday night in St Kilda and in the rain is active resistance. You pay your money, but the money barely covers the cost of what it is. No one’s going to come along and say, I love this, I’m going to purchase it. I’m going to package it up and sell 46,000 editions a day. Theatre is very hard to make a mass art form, and that’s one of its great things.”

Wright often thinks about “Ozymandias”, Percy Bysshe Shelley’s famous poem in which a traveller describes a ruined statue in a huge, empty desert. The traveller can see in the half-buried form that the sculptor had skill, and notices on the pedestal the inscription: My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings; / look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair! “People think that the purpose of being creative is to live forever,” Wright says, “but you’ll end up just a forgotten statue battered by the desert winds.”

He tells me about speaking to students at the National Institute of Dramatic Art (NIDA) about his work. He mentions his and Kosky’s The Lost Echo, of which he is still immensely proud, as well as other work from the period that he considers deep failures. “One thing these shows have in common now is that not only have the students never seen them, but they also weren’t even born then,” he says. “Theatre is just ice blocks on a frying pan.” 

This article was first published in the print edition of The Saturday Paper on September 13, 2025 as “Wright to be wrong”.

Cindy Lou snacks at Hello in Campbell

Hello is a delightful cafe for breakfast, lunch, or coffees. With the friendly service, birdlife (even some plovers – the first I’ve seen at a coffee shop), pleasant coffees and good menu, with indoor and outdoor seating this is a real find. The menu includes breakfast dishes, specials such as a delicious soup, pastas and a lamb pie, and regulars as fancy as a Lebanese lamb burger with Tzatziki.

Spring – the Manchurian pears look magnificent whether the sky is blue or gloomy. One lone daffodil! And the grape hyacinths are now appearing.

Brilliant & Bold

Brilliant & Bold, a zoom meeting held monthly by Dr Jocelynne Scutt was, this month, addressed by Benju Oli.

Benju is a registered nurse and women’s health advocate from Nepal and now resides in Australia. She has worked in Nepal and Dubai coordinating and advising families in line with her philosophy: “Empowering hearts, inspiring leaders, nurturing change.” 

Benju has experienced firsthand women’s distinct struggles as well as their strength, resilience, and leadership. She has organised and been a key participant in international webinars about women’s leadership and empowerment. Ever proud of her roots, Benju adores her nation, Nepal, and is determined to motivate women to take up leadership roles.

Benju Oli used her broad experience to talk about the new leadership in Nepal. Discussion ranged very freely across countries, cultures and influences.

The information below provided the core to discussion.

Brilliant & Bold! Global Discussion Sunday 14 September:

What constitutes leadership? Should women emulate ‘male’ leadership or what is stereotypically considered masculine – assertive, linear-orientated, exercising power without any or little consultation with subordinates? Or is there a different way of approaching leadership – more consultative, taking into account the views of others, operating as a team – even ‘first among equals’. Do women run the risk of being seen as ‘weak’ or ‘not leadership material’ if they do not follow the ‘top down’ approach? What about negotiations with other leaders. Say one is leader of a country or nation-state negotiating with the leader of another country or nation-state: does the known character of the latter impact on how a leader should go about her (or his) job? 

Following Benju Oli’s address, I found the following article:

Published by – Washington Post WorldView

By Praveen Kumar Yadav, Karishma Mehrotra and Supriya Kumar with Sammy Westfall

Young Nepalis brought down the government. Now they need a plan.

KATHMANDU, Nepal — A week before massive protests forced the resignation of Nepal’s prime minister, Tanuja Pande was hunched over her phone in Kathmandu, furiously typing in the comments section of a TikTok video.

The clip showed Nepal’s political elites flaunting their wealth — “flexing,” as she put it — contrasted with images of ordinary Nepalis departing for the Gulf, where most eke out a meager living as manual laborers.

For Pande, a 24-year-old lawyer, the video hit close to home. In her hometown of Damak, in eastern Nepal, most people in her parents’ generation went abroad to work. Back at home, she said, there aren’t enough schools and hospitals are underfunded.

Her thoughts returned to the video on Sept. 4, when the government abruptly banned dozens of social media apps, including WhatsApp, Signal and Instagram. To Pande and other young Nepalis, it was seen as a direct assault on their civic space, and a way of cutting off their connection to the country’s 2 million-strong diaspora.“We were sitting on gunpowder — and the social media shutdown ignited it,” said Devesh Jha, a Nepalese political analyst.

In a little over a week, grassroots protests over corruption would spiral into deadly violence, thrusting this small Himalayan nation into a new period of instability.

The groundswell was led by activists like Pande, who launched Gen.ZNepal, a scrappy Instagram collective that quickly grew to 30,000 followers and racked up almost 13 million views. Members used VPNs to get around the government ban and began organizing.

“This is not outrage against a particular party or leader,” Pande said in an interview on local television. “This is against the entire system.”

On Sunday, the day before their planned rally, Pande and 25 other young Nepalis met at the protest venue to discuss logistics: permissions, water supplies, fliers. “It was nothing much bigger than that,” she said.

They were on the cusp of a generational revolt, even if they didn’t know it yet. At 9 a.m. on Monday, nearly 4,000 people converged at the Maitighar Mandala monument in the heart of Kathmandu. They danced to patriotic songs and held up homemade signs: “our memes, our rules” and “this generation won’t tolerate what our parents tolerated.”

“It was really peaceful,” she said. “It was beautiful.” Thirty-six hours later, the government was gone and the capital was in flames.

The uprising was just the latest in a series of youth-led movements across South Asia that have risen up to challenge the status quo, taking down governments from Dhaka to Colombo. “What happened in Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and most recently in Indonesia inspired us to raise our voices for Nepal,” said Amrit Kumar Mishra, a 28-year-old lawyer and protester who filed a Supreme Court petition against the social media ban.

Monday’s unrest quickly spread beyond the capital. “These same politicians were in power when I was a child, and now, at 22, they are still there — unchanged, unaccountable, and corrupt,” said Ranjana Kami, who protested in the western city of Dang. In her area, she said, local fixers with political connections demand bribes for basic tasks, such as giving out citizenship certificates.

Asal Kumar Dahal, 19, who joined the protests after seeing posts on social media, said he was sick of pervasive corruption. His well-connected friend obtained a driver’s license in a week, he said, while he has been mired in bureaucracy.

Nepal is one of the most corrupt countries in the world, according to Transparency International, ranking 107 out of 180 nations. “Corruption was endemic, and so was the impunity against leaders,” said Amish Raj Mulmi, a Nepali author.

By midday Monday, the crowd in Kathmandu began to shift, according to Pande and other young protesters, and the celebratory atmosphere turned darker. Pande noticed strangers, often older men, pushing into the crowd. “I was scared of the new faces,” she said. She fired off an Instagram warning — leave immediately — and went straight home.

“Then it just spiraled,” said Pranaya Rana, a journalist who was covering the protests for Kalam Weekly, an online publication. When protesters forced their way into a restricted area, witnesses said, security forces opened fire on them with live ammunition, rubber bullets and tear gas.

“When I close my eyes, I can still see the people running scared, screaming,” said Dahal.

On Tuesday, in an effort to restore calm, the government lifted the social media ban and Prime Minister K.P. Sharma Oli resigned. Pande and other Gen Z leaders called off plans for more protests. But the chaos had taken on a life of its own. Mobs roamed the streets armed with iron rods and knives, looting businesses and attacking police officers.

By dusk, the violence reached the heart of the state. Shirtless men clambered atop the gates of Singha Durbar, an administrative palace, waving the national flag. Chanting protesters surged into parliament. Smoke choked the sky.

Nepal’s parliament, the Supreme Court, political offices, hotels and media houses were torched that day as army tanks rumbled past. A former prime minister’s wife was critically injured when rioters set fire to her home. At least 51 people were killed over two days, police said, and hundreds more wounded, according to hospital officials.

“Buildings can be rebuilt,” said Mulmi. “But the idea of the Nepali state itself has been put into doubt.”

“Gen Z has achieved their goals, but at a very, very large cost to the country,” said Rana, the journalist.

Pande bristled at suggestions that her movement was responsible for the bloodshed. “What happened on September 9 was not by us,” she said Wednesday, after taking part in negotiations with the army. “They are trying to dirty our movement.”

Kathmandu is a city in shock. Banks and police stations were shuttered on Wednesday. In some neighborhoods, volunteers swept rubble from the streets. Across Nepal, people are reckoning with how the country arrived at this moment — and what comes next.

Nepal emerged from civil war in 2006 after a brutal, years-long Maoist insurgency. Political progress was halting; governments came and went. A popular movement that began in 2006 led to abolition of the monarchy in 2008. It took seven years and two constituent assemblies to adopt a constitution, which enshrined federalism and secularism. When Oli first rose to power in 2015, a new generation was “promised a new Nepal,” Rana said.

But “we never experienced those changes in practice,” said Mishra, the lawyer.

One in 5 Nepalis live below the poverty line and nearly half survive on less than $6.85 a day, according to the World Bank. Almost a quarter of young people are unemployed, and remittances account for nearly a third of GDP. As migration separated families and drained Nepal of skilled labor, the children of government ministers showed off their lavish lifestyles online.

“The anti-corruption mood came because the wealth gap is widening,” said Mulmi.

In March, thousands rallied in Kathmandu for the restoration of the monarchy under former king Gyanendra. Now, Gen Z protesters fear they are trying to co-opt the uprising.

When the Nepali Army Chief allowed a pro-monarchy figure into talks on Wednesday, the protesters left the table immediately, they said. Army spokesperson Raja Ram Basnet declined to comment. “We are currently focused on maintaining law and order,” he told The Washington Post.

On Friday, one of protesters’ key demands was met when former chief justice Sushila Karki was sworn in as caretaker leader, making her the country’s first female prime minister. After taking the oath of office, she called for new elections in six months.

Many protesters support Balendra Shah, Kathmandu’s rapper turned mayor, whose songs about inequality and government ineptitude helped propel him to power. But for those on the front lines of the country’s sudden political transition, the future looms large and uncertain.

“I don’t think the Gen Z really has a plan,” said Jha. Even Pande admitted: “We are confused right now.”

The Tyranny of Structurelessness

During the discussion on leadership, the following article, ‘The Tyranny of Structurelessness’ was raised, and well worth (re-)reading.

ORIGINAL INTRODUCTION


“During the years in which the women’s liberation movement has been taking shape, a great emphasis has been placed on what are called leaderless,
structureless groups as the main form of the movement. The source of this idea was a natural reaction against the overstructured society in which most of us found ourselves, the inevitable control this gave others over our lives, and the continual elitism of the Left and similar groups among those who were supposedly fighting this over-structuredness.

The idea of ‘structurelessness’, however, has moved from a healthy counter to
these tendencies to becoming a goddess in its own right. The idea is as little examined as the term is much used, but it has become an intrinsic and unquestioned part of women’s liberation ideology. For the early development of the movement this did not much matter. It early defined its main method as conscious ness-raising, and the ‘structureless rap group’ was an excellent means to this end. Its looseness and informality encouraged participation in discussion and the often supportive atmosphere elicited personal insight. If nothing more concrete than personal insight ever resulted from these groups, that did not much matter, because their purpose did not really extend beyond this.

The basic problems didn’t appear until individual rap groups exhausted the virtues of consciousness-raising and decided they wanted to do some- thing more specific. At this point they usually floundered because most groups were unwilling to change their structure when they changed their task. Women had thoroughly accepted the idea of ‘structurelessness’ without realising the limitations of its uses. People would try to use the ‘structureless’ group and the informal conference for purposes for which they were unsuitable out of a blind belief that no other means could possibly be anything but oppressive.

If the movement is to move beyond these elementary stages of development, it will have to disabuse itself of some of its prejudices about organisation and structure. There is nothing inherently bad about either of these. They can be and often are misused, but to reject them out of hand because they are misused is to deny ourselves the necessary tools to further development. We need to understand why ‘structurelessness’ does not work…”

International Anarchist Pl‘ The Tyranny of Structurelessness’, by Jo Freeman, was first printed by the women’s liberation movement, USA, in 1970. It was reprinted in Berkeley Journal of Sociology in 1970 and later issued as a pamphlet by Agitprop in 1972. It was again issued as a pamphlet by the Leeds wom en’s group of the Organisation of Revolutionary Anarchists (ORA) and then re- printed by the Kingston group of the Anarchist Workers’ Association (AWA). It was later Published jointly by Dark Star Press and Rebel Press in 1984 in a pamphlet called ‘Untying the Knot – Feminism, Anarchism & Organisation’, with the printing done by Aldgate Press [84b Whitechapel High St, London E1]. Around 1996 this text was placed on the web at http://www.tigerden.com/~berios/tos.txt . This edition is based on a that text with US spellings switched to British ones. See Further Commentary and Articles arising from Books* and continued longer articles as noted in the blog. for the complete article.

‘Just doing his job’: Albanese government backs ABC reporter blasted by Trump

Story by Adam Vidler

The Albanese government has thrown its support behind an Australian journalist who was subjected to a spray and threat from US President Donald Trump.

ABC journalist John Lyons, on assignment for the program Four Corners, quizzed Trump on his business dealings while in office, asking if it was “appropriate” for a sitting president to be engaged in so much personal commerce.

“My kids are running the business,” Trump said, before asking where Lyons was from.

“The Australians. You’re hurting Australia, right? In my opinion, you are hurting Australia very much right now,” Trump said.

“And they want to get along with me. You know, your leader is coming over to see me very soon. I’m going to tell them about you. You set a very bad tone.”

The Trump administration continued the criticism online after posting a video of the exchange on an official White House account with the caption: ”POTUS smacks down a rude foreign Fake News loser (many such cases).”

The Trump family has been involved in numerous business undertakings arguably bolstered by the patriarch’s presidential status, including golf course deals and cryptocurrency launches, since the start of Trump’s second term.

Speaking on camera for the ABC later this morning, Lyons addressed the clash.

“If our job as journalists is to hold truth to power, then surely asking legitimate questions politely to the president of the United States should be acceptable, but in this day and age now, it’s not,” he said.Expand article logo  

He referenced Donald Trump’s US$15 billion ($22.4 billion) lawsuit announced against the New York Times yesterday, saying it was all part of his “war on the media”.

Lyons defended his questions as fair, research-based, and politely conveyed.

Asked whether he had been banned from White House grounds, he said it would be a “very dark day” if that was the case.

“I don’t think we’ve yet reached that point though,” he said.

It’s a controversy that has been raised since Trump was first elected president and refused to divest himself of his business interests while in office.

When asked about the exchange at a press conference this afternoon, Treasurer Jim Chalmers said Lyons was “just doing his job”. 

“I respect the ABC and I respect its independence, and that extends to not second-guessing the questions asked legitimately by journalists at press conferences,” he said.

“Journalists have a job to do, and as far as I can tell, that journalist was just doing his job in Washington DC.

Week beginning 10 September 2025

Jane Caro Lyrebird Allen & Unwin, April 2025.*

Thank you, NetGalley, for providing me with this uncorrected proof for review.

A lyrebird’s cry in a lonely bush site echoes a desperate woman’s cry for help. It is overheard by a student, who aware of its possible significance, takes her recording to the police. With no body, and no respect for Jessica Weston’s theory, the case remains unresolved. Twenty years later a body is found at the site and Jessica, now Associate Professor, and retired Megan Blaxland brought back for the new inquiry, together are determined to solve the case.

Caro makes superb use of features of the Australian bush – the loneliness, silence, foliage and undergrowth, and its beauty which hides a heinous crime. Her commitment to caring for the environment is made through engaging characters, the exposition becoming an integral part of the social commentary which provides a thoughtful background to solving the crime.

Characterisation is a strong feature of this novel, Megan Blaxland becoming a figure who would make excellent returning character. However, she is not alone in being a well-developed personality. Caro achieves complexity in her characters by weaving their flaws together with positive characteristics. At the same time, a sense of chill surrounds even the friendliest of interactions. This is a crime that, despite the possibility of wider ramifications has a small town, claustrophobic feel about it, the bush and the lyre bird’s lonely song playing a sinister part in achieving this.

This is the first of Jane Caro’s novels that I have read, although I follow her shorter contributions in the media. I found Caro’s combination of good story telling, social commentary, and a complex crime to be solved very inviting and look forward to reading her past and future work.

*I have posted this review in its entirety here, and it also appears at Books: Reviews .

Amy Blumenfeld Such Good People Spark Press, July 2025.

Thank you, NetGalley, for providing me with this uncorrected proof for review.

April and Rudy become childhood friends, and their families replicate this closeness. April and Rudy’s lives take different paths as young adults, but they and their families remain close. When April invites Rudy to join her at a college event the result is disastrous. Rudy prevents her being assaulted by another guest who later dies. Rudy is arrested and gaoled. April moves on, marrying and having a family. One focus of the novel celebrates the closeness that the families maintain despite these changes. Another is Rudy’s release from prison and the impact it has on April, her husband and children, and less immediately, the journalist who was also present at the college event.

Although I finished this book, there were times that the language really grated, and I was tempted to stop reading. For example, ‘tresses’ for hair, ‘atop’ on occasions when a simple ‘on’ would do, and ‘pertain’ instead of ‘about.’ At times April’s responses were also jarring. She is introduced as the wife of an aspiring politician, but when a journalist phones, rather than query the reason, she provides a host of information about herself, her husband, family, and their activities. This seems more in keeping with the young student about whose past the journalist is calling rather than a mature woman in a political world. April continues to make unrealistic choices, demonstrating her care and concern for her childhood friend Rudy, but at times overlooking her current responsibilities. On the positive side, telling the story from April’s, Rudy’s and Jillian’s perspectives helps with characterisation, develops a story line that demonstrates the importance and depth of the childhood friendship, and its continuation into young adulthood, as well offering reasons for as Jillian’s complicated reactions to events. The complete review appears at Books: Reviews

American Politics

Joyce Vance from Civil Discourse <joycevance@substack.com>

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more

Forgetting the Survivors Joyce Vance Sep 1 

Everyone but the survivors—the people who deserve it the most—seems to be the focus of the renewed interest in Jeffrey Epstein. Politics, prurience, and curiosity about which political and pop culture figures might be mentioned in the files have dominated media coverage while people on both sides of the aisle clamor for the release of information gathered by the government as it prepared to prosecute Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.

This week, some of the survivors will meet privately with members of the House Oversight Committee, and there may be some public testimony. The survivors have been critical of the administration’s handling of the situation, but no one seems to be listening to them. Imagine having been victimized by these people and then having to listen to the shameful “interview” by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, who let Maxwell whitewash her conduct. Blanche, who was not on the prosecution team that tried the case, failed to challenge Maxwell, who was convicted by a jury of sex trafficking, when she claimed she never saw “underage women” (many of us would call them “girls”) being abused. Blanche even fed her lines when she faltered.

No one should be surprised that a convicted criminal, sentenced to 20 years in prison, would claim she never did anything wrong—especially when her conviction is still on appeal and the government is holding out the prospect of transfer to a much more hospitable prison setting than the one she was in. What’s appalling is that no one at the Justice Department or in the administration seems to have considered the survivors when they released the video and the transcript, or, for that matter, when they gave Maxwell favorable treatment, moving her from a federal prison in Florida to a minimum-security prison camp in Texas just days after the interview with Blanche. The Justice Department, which the Bureau of Prisons is a component of, offered no explanation for the unprecedented transfer of a convicted sex offender, but it seemed to come in exchange for saying Donald Trump hadn’t done anything criminal.

“Trump was always very cordial and very kind to me. And I just want to say that I find — I — I admire his extraordinary achievement in becoming the President now. And I like him, and I’ve always liked him. So that is the sum and substance of my entire relationship with him,” Maxwell said in the interview. Trump couldn’t have asked for anything better. Maxwell seems to have understood the importance of playing to the audience of one when you want something.

The Trump Justice Department has not spoken with any of the survivors as part of its review of the prosecutions. Maxwell’s trial took place during the Biden administration. The lead trial lawyer, coincidentally, was former FBI Director Jim Comey’s daughter, Maurene. She was fired by the Trump administration in July, with no reason given.

On Wednesday, there will be a nonpartisan rally on The Hill in Washington, D.C., participated in by groups that work to end human trafficking and to support survivors.

Rachel Foster, a cofounder of World Without Exploitation, an advocacy group for survivors of trafficking, explained why the rally on Wednesday is so important, why the focus should be on survivors, and what this repeated victimization is doing to them: “That is the focus of our coming together on Wednesday — to listen to those who were exploited by Epstein and Maxwell and have suffered decades long harm. These women have been omitted and silenced for too long. They are gathering to speak out about what justice means to them, and it’s not leniency or a pardon for the one perpetrator who has been held accountable for the egregious and predatory crimes she committed.”

Former federal prosecutor and Westchester County DA Mimi Rocah put it like this, “the real victims—over 1,000 by this DOJ’s own statement—have been further traumatized by allowing Maxwell this platform to spew her falsehoods. And, just as important, some of the most important cases that federal prosecutors bring–sex trafficking and child sexual enticement and abuse cases—will no doubt be jeopardized. Because who would trust a DOJ that orchestrates such a travesty of justice.”

When survivors of crimes are ignored, we should ask the question: Why is this happening? Here, the answer seems simple; the Trump administration is playing politics, not doing justice. They offered to release the Epstein files, a promise they haven’t delivered on, without talking with the survivors first and hearing their views. Epstein didn’t care about the people he exploited. Maxwell still doesn’t. And this administration and its Justice Department, the people charged with that duty under law, don’t either.

This week, a number of Epstein and Maxwell survivors will be coming out in public for the first time, and many who have never done so before will speak out. This is the power of being in community and finding courage and solidarity. When the survivors speak, we should all listen.

We’re in this together,

Joyce

Haley Robson answers reporters’ questions during a news conference with other alleged victims of disgraced financier and sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, outside the US Capitol on September 3, 2025. 
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Heathercoxrichardson@substack.com> 

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more

September 5, 2025Heather Cox RichardsonSep 6  

Today President Donald J. Trump signed an executive order to rename the Department of Defense as the Department of War, although the 1947 abandonment of the Department of War name was not simply a matter of substituting a new name for the original one. In 1947, to bring order and efficiency to U.S. military forces, Congress renamed the Department of War as the Department of the Army, then brought it, together with the Department of the Navy and a new Department of the Air Force, into a newly established “National Military Establishment” overseen by the secretary of defense.

In 1949, Congress replaced the National Military Establishment name, whose initials sounded unfortunately like “enemy,” with Department of Defense. The new name emphasized that the Allied Powers of World War II would join together to focus on deterring wars by standing against offensive wars launched by big countries against their smaller neighbors. Although Trump told West Point graduates this year that “[t]he military’s job is to dominate any foe and annihilate any threat to America, anywhere, anytime, and any place,” in fact, the stated mission of the Department of Defense is “to provide the military forces needed to deter war and ensure our nation’s security.”As Amanda Castro and Hannah Parry of Newsweek note, in August, Trump said he wanted the change because “Defense is too defensive…we want to be offensive too if we have to be.” By law, Congress must approve the change, which Politico estimates will cost billions of dollars, although Trump said: “I’m sure Congress will go along if we need that. I don’t think we even need that.” By this evening, nameplates and signage bearing the new name had gone up in government offices and the URL for the Defense Department website had been changed to war [dot] gov.

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has pushed the change because he sees it as part of his campaign to spread a “warrior ethos” at the Pentagon. Today he said the name change was part of “restoring intentionality to the use of force…. We’re going to go on offense, not just on defense. Maximum lethality, not tepid legality, violent effect, not politically correct. We’re going to raise up warriors, not just defenders. So this War Department, Mr. President, just like America, is back.”In 1947, when the country dropped the “War Department” name, the chief of staff of the U.S. Army—the highest-ranking officer on active duty—was five-star general Dwight D. Eisenhower. It is unusual for anyone to suggest that Eisenhower, who led the Allied troops in World War II, was insufficiently committed to military strength. Indeed, the men who changed the name to “Defense Department” and tried to create a rules-based international order did so precisely because war was not a game to them. Having seen the carnage of war not just on the battlefield but among civilians who faced firebombing, death camps, homelessness, starvation, and the obscenity of atomic weapons, they hoped to find a way to make sure insecure, power-hungry men could not start another war easily.

The Movement Conservatives who took over the Republican Party in the 1980s leaned heavily on a mythologized image of the American cowboy as a strong, independent individual who wanted nothing from the government but to be left alone. That image supported decades of attacks on the modern government as “socialism,” and it has now metastasized in the MAGA movement to suggest that the men in charge of the government should be able to do whatever they want.

Just what that looks like was made clear on Wednesday when the Trump administration launched a strike on a boat carrying 11 civilians it claimed were smuggling drugs. Covering the story, the New York Times reported that “Pentagon officials were still working Wednesday on what legal authority they would tell the public was used to back up the extraordinary strike in international waters.”

Today, David Philipps and Matthew Cole reported another military strike approved by Trump in his first term that was previously undisclosed. In the New York Times, they reported that in early 2019, Trump okayed a Navy SEAL mission to plant an electronic device in North Korea. The plan went awry when their activity near the shore attracted a civilian fishing boat with two or three men diving for shellfish. The SEALs killed the men on the boat, punctured their lungs with knives so the bodies would sink, abandoned the mission, and returned to base.

The administration never notified the Gang of Eight, the eight leaders of Congress who must be briefed on intelligence activities unless the president thinks it is essential to limit access to information about a covert operation. The Gang of Eight is made up of the leaders of both parties in each chamber of Congress, as well as the chairs and ranking minority members of the intelligence committee of each chamber.

Military officials appear concerned that Trump might continue to send personnel into precarious missions. Those who were involved in or knew about the North Korea mission said they were speaking up now because they are worried that such failures are often hidden and that if the public only hears about successful operations, “they may underestimate the extreme risks American forces undertake.”

Trump’s promise that his demonstrations of strength would make the U.S. a leader on the international stage is also falling apart. Barak Ravid and Dave Lawler of Axios reported that in a conversation yesterday with European Union leaders, Trump backed away from his promises to increase pressure on Russia to stop its war against Ukraine and instead told the leaders they must do it themselves.Also yesterday, the Financial Times reported that the administration will no longer help to fund military training and infrastructure in Estonia, Lithuania, and Latvia, Baltic nations vulnerable to Russian incursions. National security scholar Tom Nichols commented: “I am adamant about people not falling prey to conspiracy theories about Trump and the Russians, but this is a classic moment where it’s understandable to ask: If the Russians owned him, how would his actions be any different?”

The administration has not briefed Congress on the change.

Earlier this week, on September 3, leaders Xi Jinping of China, Vladimir Putin of Russia, Kim Jong Un of North Korea, and Alexander Lukashenko of Belarus met in Beijing to celebrate the anniversary of the formal surrender of Japan and the end of World War II. The day before, Putin described Xi as a dear friend and said the ties between the two leaders are at an “unprecedented level.”

Trump did not appear to take the meeting well. He posted at Xi, reminding him of “the massive amount of support and ‘blood’ that the United States of America gave to China in order to help it to secure its FREEDOM from a very unfriendly foreign invader” and adding: “Please give my warmest regards to Vladimir Putin, and Kim Jong Un, as you conspire against the United States of America. PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP”

India’s president, Narendra Modi, also met with Xi this week as Beijing continued to push the idea that it is now the head of a new world order. Trump responded: “Looks like we’ve lost India and Russia to deepest, darkest, China. May they have a long and prosperous future together!”Reality is also intruding on the Republicans’ insistence that only they know how to run the economy.

Although Trump inherited a booming economy, he insisted that it was actually in terrible shape and that his tariffs would bring back manufacturing and make life better for those left behind by 40 years of economic policy that concentrated wealth at the top of society.

In fact, data released Tuesday show that U.S. manufacturing has contracted for six straight months. Economic journalist Catherine Rampell noted that the U.S. has fewer manufacturing jobs today than it had before the beginning of the coronavirus pandemic in 2020. The country has lost 78,000 manufacturing jobs this year. Seventy-two percent of Texas manufacturers say the tariffs are hurting their businesses. Only 3.7% think the tariffs are helping them.

Yesterday’s immigration raid on a Hyundai Motor battery plant in Georgia is unlikely to send a reassuring message to manufacturers. U.S. agents arrested 475 individuals, more than 300 of whom were South Korean nationals. Included in the sweep were business travelers. In August, Hyundai said it would invest $26 billion in the U.S. through 2028.Today’s new jobs report, the first since Trump fired the previous director of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) after accusing her of rigging the numbers for political reasons, was poor. It showed that the U.S. added just 22,000 jobs in August, far below the expected 75,000, while the jobs numbers for June and July were revised downward by 21,000 jobs. The numbers show that the economy is faltering.Just before the report was due to be released, the BLS website went down, an unfortunate reminder that the bureau is in turmoil. Today Em Steck and Andrew Kaczynski of CNN confirmed and expanded an August story by David Gilbert of Wired revealing what appears to be an old Twitter account belonging to E.J. Antoni, Trump’s pick to run the BLS. The account posted conspiracy theories and sexist, racist, and homophobic attacks, and parrotted Trump’s talking points.

Last night, when asked if he would trust today’s job numbers, Trump answered: “Well, we’re going to have to see what the numbers, I don’t know, they come out tomorrow. But the real numbers that I’m talking about are going to be whatever it is. But, uh, will be in a year from now when these monstrous huge beautiful places they’re palaces of genius and when they start opening up. You’re seeing, I think you’ll see job numbers that are absolutely incredible. Right now it’s a lot of construction numbers, but you’re going to see job numbers like our country has never seen before.”—

Notes:https://www.newsweek.com/trump-department-war-hegseth-defense-order-live-updates-2125101https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/03/us/politics/hegseth-venezuela-drug-strike.htmlhttps://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/05/us/navy-seal-north-korea-trump-2019.htmlhttps://www.axios.com/2025/09/04/trump-zelensky-call-ukraine-russia-peace-talkshttps://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2025/09/04/trump-europe-security-russia-ukraine/https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/02/world/video/china-military-parade-xi-putin-kim-digvidhttps://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c78z2p6gg1zohttps://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cr4e4ngvvnrohttps://www.reuters.com/world/china/modi-says-russia-india-stand-together-even-difficult-times-2025-09-01/https://www.reuters.com/world/china/trump-says-india-russia-appear-lost-deepest-darkest-china-2025-09-05/https://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-manufacturing-activity-contracts-for-sixth-straight-month-in-august-its-survival-151934968.htmlhttps://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/trump-tariffs-economy-manufacturing-ism-rcna228790https://www.wsj.com/us-news/u-s-arrests-hundreds-in-raid-at-hyundai-plant-construction-site-in-georgia-4e150febhttps://abcnews.go.com/Business/bls-set-release-1st-jobs-report-trump-fired/story?id=125249122https://www.politico.com/news/2025/09/04/white-house-pentagon-department-of-war-00545673https://www.axios.com/2025/09/05/trump-jobs-report-august-bls-website-outagehttps://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5486849-live-updates-trump-jobs-report-white-house/https://www.wired.com/story/twitter-ej-antoni-trump-bls-conspiracy-theories-epstein-covid-election-denial/https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/05/politics/kfile-ej-antoni-bureau-of-labor-statistics-twitter-account-vishttps://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-west-point-address-dei-immigration-b2757275.htmlhttps://www.war.gov/About/​​Bluesky:justinwolfers.bsky.social/post/3ly3pb4lxf227crampell.bsky.social/post/3ly3pzg6rf22xliveadivinelife.bsky.social/post/3lxwiq6kw6y2rgtconway.bsky.social/post/3ly3kpkqvls2qyouranonjd.bsky.social/post/3lxx2y5ml6c27thebulwark.com/post/3ly2ebqsk5c22atrupar.com/post/3ly4ignwtyd2bnbcnews.com/post/3ly4secg6cb2h

A Mighty Girl – Facebook site

Happy 71st birthday to Ruby Bridges! Ruby was only six when she walked through a vicious mob toward William Frantz Elementary School on November 14, 1960. As Ruby became one of the first Black children to desegregate an all-White elementary school in the South, four U.S. Marshals surrounded her to protect the small girl as protesters hurled objects and racial slurs at her.

One woman held up a Black doll in a coffin, shaking it as Ruby passed. Another threatened to poison her. Federal Marshal Charles Burks, who escorted her that day, would never forget what he witnessed: “For a little girl six years old going into a strange school with four strange deputy marshals, a place she had never been before, she showed a lot of courage. She never cried. She didn’t whimper. She just marched along like a little soldier. We were all very proud of her.”

Inside William Frantz, an apocalyptic silence replaced the chaos. White parents had withdrawn their children overnight rather than have them attend school with a Black first-grader. The hallways stood empty, classroom after classroom abandoned. That first day, the chaos was so intense that Ruby and her mother Lucille spent the entire day in the principal’s office, unable to even reach a classroom. On the second day, Ruby finally made it to Room 112, where she met the only teacher who had volunteered to teach her after her colleagues refused: Barbara Henry, a 28-year-old from Boston.

The next day, the wall of White resistance showed its first crack. Methodist minister Lloyd Anderson Foreman walked his five-year-old daughter Pam into the school through a gauntlet of curses and threats from the angry mob, declaring, “I simply want the privilege of taking my child to school.” Within days, a handful of other White parents followed his lead. Though the protests began to subside, these children were kept in separate classrooms. Ruby could hear voices in the hallway again — proof the school was slowly returning to life.

For the entire year, however, Ruby remained alone with Mrs. Henry, who taught her as if addressing a full class, maintaining the fiction of normalcy while federal marshals guarded an empty playground during recess. When someone called threatening to poison Ruby’s lunch, the six-year-old began eating only food brought from home, sealed and checked by her mother. When she came back for second grade, the mob was gone. Other Black students had enrolled. White children filled the classrooms again.

The Bridges family paid a devastating price for their courage. Ruby’s father Abon lost his job at the gas station the day after she entered William Frantz. Her sharecropping grandparents were evicted from Mississippi land they’d worked for decades. Local grocery stores turned the family away. Federal marshals had to guard their home against nighttime threats. Through it all, Ruby kept walking through that mob each morning. Years later, she would recall what her mother Lucille had told her: “You’re going to school today, and you’re going for all of us.”

Today, on her 71st birthday, Ruby Bridges reflects on that year with remarkable grace. “I now know that experience comes to us for a purpose, and if we follow the guidance of the spirit within us, we will probably find that the purpose is a good one.” She founded the Ruby Bridges Foundation to promote tolerance through education, transforming her trauma into purpose.

“Racism is a grown-up disease,” she says, “and we must stop using our children to spread it.” In 2011, she stood in the White House as President Obama unveiled Norman Rockwell’s painting “The Problem We All Live With” — the image of a little girl in a white dress who showed a nation what courage looks like.

If you’d like to share Ruby Bridge’s inspiring story with children, we highly recommend the picture book “The Story Of Ruby Bridges” for ages 4 to 8 (https://www.amightygirl.com/the-story-of-ruby-bridges), the early chapter book “Ruby Bridges Goes to School” for ages 5 to 8 (https://www.amightygirl.com/ruby-bridges-goes-to-school), and the memoir that Ruby Bridges wrote for ages 8 to 12 entitled “Through My Eyes” (https://www.amightygirl.com/through-my-eyes).

Ruby Bridges is the author of the picture book “I Am Ruby Bridges” for ages 4 to 8 (https://www.amightygirl.com/i-am-ruby-bridges) and a book connecting today’s activism with her own childhood experiences for ages 10 and up “This Is Your Time” for ages 10 and up (https://www.amightygirl.com/this-is-your-time)

There is also an inspiring film about her story called “Ruby Bridges” for viewers 7 and up at https://www.amightygirl.com/ruby-bridges

For books for all ages about more courageous girls and women of the U.S. Civil Rights Movement for children and teens, check out our blog post on “50 Inspiring Books on Girls & Women of the Civil Rights Movement” at https://www.amightygirl.com/blog?p=11177

For our favorite t-shirt celebrating fierce Mighty Girls like Ruby Bridges, check out the “Though She Be But Little She Is Fierce” t-shirt — available in a variety of styles and colors for all ages at https://www.amightygirl.com/fierce-t-shirt

British Politics

Tom Watson’s Newsletter

Tom Watson <tomwatsonofficial@substack.com> Unsubscribe

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more

Angela Rayner’s second act

Why the country still needs her voice and why Labour no longer needs a deputy leader. Sep 6 

Angela Rayner has resigned. She should be Labour’s last ever deputy leader.

I am heartbroken for her. Angela’s life tells a bigger story about Britain. A childhood on a Stockport council estate, a mum at sixteen, night shifts in care, a union rep who learned how to organise and to speak for those who are not heard, an MP who fought her constituents’ corner, a minister who became Deputy Prime Minister. This is the long route to public service, earned the hard way, and it commands respect.

In government she brought a voice rooted in experience. She spoke as people speak. Long before office she said that ideology never put food on her table; it is the kind of sentence that cuts through because it comes from a life lived close to the edge. Many of her former colleagues are able administrators who keep the machine moving; Angela added something rarer, a felt understanding of the dignity of work and the worth of every person.

The events are painful and the weather is still rough. She has taken responsibility and stepped down. Politics moves at speed; the human rhythm is slower. The diary loses its weight, friends call, colleagues carry on, the work feels far away. I have known enough of public life to recognise that moment and I want her to know that reach does not vanish with office. It can be redirected and it can do good.

What comes next must be hers to decide, not mine to dictate. Yet if she chooses to put her energy where her life gives her authority, she can move the country: better pay and standards for paid carers, a serious advance for young carers who shoulder adult burdens too soon, adult literacy for families who were left behind, skills and second chances that open real paths and community power in places that feel forgotten. She belongs in front of a camera when it serves the cause. The public already trusts her to speak plainly and to listen well.

Now the institutional point. The role of deputy leader invites theatre without remit. It duplicates authority and muddies accountability. It tempts every faction to see a second power base where there should be clear lines of responsibility. At a time when the economy demands focus and steadiness, we should retire the title. Change our rules for who fronts the party when the leader is unavailable, empower a party chair with published objectives. Less parade, more purpose.

Those who remain in cabinet will go on with the hard graft of governing and many will do it well. None of that diminishes what set Angela apart: the ease with which she can walk into any room, listen hard and draw out the truth of people’s lives. That is a kind of leadership the country still needs.

I have a hunch the best is yet to come from Angie Rayner. And she is about to learn that you resign as a deputy leader but you can never resign as an ex-deputy leader.

Tom Watson’s Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Australian Politics

The Saturday Paper

Dennis Glover

The seven lessons of Nazi history

Occasionally something happens that turns our collective minds to history. That happened this week when Nazis dominated Australian headlines for possibly the first time since the end of World War II.

Australia’s Nazis are rattling the cage, trying to transform themselves from a secretive, mask-wearing sect into a political movement that influences our political ideas and controls the streets through violence. Their leader – bald-headed, dark-shirted, with a statement-making moustache – is staring at us defiantly from our newsfeeds and front pages.

Some might say they’re just a micro-cult of idiots; ignore them and they will go away. Thirty years ago, perhaps, but not now.

To understand why this has changed, we only need to look at the state of the world. Nazi-inspired agitators may be few in number, but they are casting a giant shadow through their explosive ideas and aggressive tactics, which are rapidly being copied by more mainstream politicians who should know better. This is how Nazis have always operated and likely always will. Like all ultra-radical movements that don’t have to deal with messy political realities or worry about the truth, their words and actions have a clarity that is easily understood and has strong appeal to the frustrated, impatient, unheard and unhinged. In Germany, France and Italy, parties inspired by Nazis – or with actual historical roots in Nazism and fascism – are either in power or threatening to achieve it. In the United States, Nazi-like groups were prominently involved in the assault on the Capitol on January 6, 2021.

Let’s not call them neo-Nazis because there’s nothing new about them. Look at how they dress, their violent street tactics, the way they openly admire Adolf Hitler, call themselves his followers, talk of racial purity (white Australians are “thoroughbreds”) and deny the Holocaust. They are Nazis, and proud of it.

To combat them we should look to history and especially to the mistakes our grandparents and great-grandparents made in combatting the original Nazis.

What can history tell us?

Lesson 1. We must not be complacent, kidding ourselves that these Nazis will disappear if we ignore them. From little things, big things grow. These people are always potentially dangerous – and we are at the moment of maximum danger as they look to build a movement that can influence the mainstream. There were only about 40 of them at the Melbourne rally, but look how easily they took control of a directionless crowd. We may think they can’t get bigger; history says otherwise.

Lesson 2. Beware unexpected catastrophes. Nazis – much like other authoritarians such as Russian President Vladimir Putin – are waiting for catastrophic events to favour them.

In the 1928 elections at the Reichstag, the Weimar-era German parliament, Hitler’s Nazi Party won just 2.6 per cent of the vote. They were an irrelevancy, or so most thought. Then in 1929 came the Great Depression. As Germany descended into political gloom, the Nazis were able to pose as national saviours, offering a simple and appealing message of national redemption. They provided a voice for the voiceless, a conspiracy theory to explain the catastrophe, and enemies to blame. How familiar does this sound, as our own Nazis rail about imaginary violations of their freedom of speech, denounce immigration as the cause of every problem and vent against recent migrants and Indigenous Australians? They may not gain the same level of influence as Hitler’s Nazis, but they can spread hatred and wreak havoc.

In 1930, the Nazi vote increased sevenfold to 18.3 per cent. In July 1932, it roughly doubled again to 37.3 per cent. Six months later, the party was in power.

Lesson 3. Don’t underestimate them. Much of the analysis and rhetoric about today’s Nazis seems wrong. They look like bumptious fools, and their leader comes across as an aggressive, breathless try-hard, screeching idiotic statements free of facts. But Hitler and his Brownshirts were laughed at, too. We must stop calling them “cowards”. This is comforting but delusional. Male courage, political violence and endless struggle is one of the strongest defining characteristics of Nazism – then and now. They are tough and nasty and unafraid, and it’s better to acknowledge this and accept they are dangerous.

In 1930, the Nazi vote increased sevenfold to 18.3 per cent. In July 1932, it roughly doubled again to 37.3 per cent. Six months later, the party was in power.

Lesson 4. Never acknowledge that they may have a point. I’ve lost count of the number of callers to talkback radio this week who have said things like: “I hold no truck for Nazis and fascists, but you’ve got to admit they have a point about immigration and the direction of the country.” While politicians may think it clever to try to wean people away from extremists by acknowledging their discontent, this only provides legitimacy for dangerous ideas. The mainstream conservative establishment in Germany was complicit in this by waving through the persecution of Jews.

Lesson 5. Nazis can’t be co-opted or controlled. Many believe Hitler came to power through the popular vote, but that’s not the case. He never received much more than a third of the vote. He was put in power by establishment politicians, businessmen and media moguls, who believed they could make him chancellor, pack his cabinet withmoderating influences and steal his voters. A year later, some of these geniuses were dead.

Any politician who thinks it’s a smart tactic to share platforms with Nazis, or go soft on criticising them or their supporters, is a fool. Hitler’s aim was always to supplant the mainstream conservative parties, not assist their re-election campaigns. His tactics caused chaos in the conservative parties – something the Victorian Liberals might profitably ponder, given that much of their current internal misery can be traced back to the appearance of Hitler-saluting Nazis at a Liberal MP-organised rally on the steps of Victoria’s Parliament House in 2023. Today’s Nazis likely don’t give a damn about the Coalition; they want to destroy it. Maybe they already have.

Lesson 6. Don’t give them an even break. In 1923, Hitler attempted a coup in Munich, aiming to take over the government of Bavaria and march on Berlin to seize power, just as fascist leader Benito Mussolini had succeeded in doing in Italy the previous year. It failed and Hitler was arrested and tried for insurrection. Instead of being given the death penalty he was given a comfortable prison cell where he wrote Mein Kampf  before he was released early and his party re-legalised. Had he simply been made to serve out his full term of imprisonment, he wouldn’t have been around to take political advantage of the Great Depression, and World War II might not have happened. The failure to prosecute and jail Donald Trump after his assault on the Capitol should be sufficient proof that history repeats.Like all ultra-radical movements that don’t have to deal withLike all ultra-radical movements that don’t have to deal with messy political realities or worry about the truth, their words and actions have a clarity that is easily understood and has strong appeal to the frustrated, impatient, unheard and unhinged.

The temptation is to say we shouldn’t jail these homebred Nazis or their leader because it’s what they want, or because while we may disagree with them, they deserve their freedom of speech, or because they are expressing popular beliefs. This is nonsense. These Nazis, like the original Nazis, would regard this as weakness – certainly a courtesy they would never extend were the jackboot on the other foot. Common sense tells us that when Nazis brazenly commit crime, they should be penalised to the full extent of the law, because anything less will only embolden and enable them to come back for more.

We got a glimpse of this in Melbourne this week. After the completion of the rally, the Nazis were free to leave, seemingly unwatched. And what did they do? They staged their pogrom at Camp Sovereignty, where they allegedly battered First Nations women. Two days later, their leader interrupted a press conference by Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan, and was finally handcuffed and arrested outside the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court along with two associates in relation to the Camp Sovereignty incident. The Nazis mean our community nothing but harm, and believing the promises they may make to moderate their behaviour is naive. After 1923, Hitler claimed to be a changed man – until he got into power.

Lesson 7. Nazis and similar extremists can succeed in influencing politics here in Australia. If it can happen in Europe, America and Britain, where Nazi-inspired rioters last year attempted to burn down a refugee hostel – it can happen here. All it needs is a spark and it can spread. The Great Depression may not happen again, but in this era of pandemics, trade wars and major military conflict, it’s not too difficult to imagine a scenario that might propel these Nazis, or their evil ideas, to greater prominence.

Historians have called Australia’s democracy a laboratory. The current moment is a laboratory-like opportunity to learn from the mistakes of the long-ago past and stop these Nazis before their movement grows and ideas spread. Europe and the United States failed to do this; we mustn’t. Let’s be part of the solution to the global spread of Nazis and their ideas.

This article was first published in the print edition of The Saturday Paper on September 6, 2025 as “The seven lessons of Nazi history”.

Kath Mazzella OAM – Red Knickers Day

MP Dave Kelly MP placed 60 pairs of red knickers for Gynaecological health awareness day today on politicians’ chairs. This was placed on the Premier Roger Cook’s chair today. Hope he liked the surprise. X Kath Mazzella OAM

❤️

Barbara Pym

A favourite Barbara Pym – well-worn copies, full of notes in the margins, yellow stickers as reminders…

The article, “Paradise Regained: the reopening of Simpsons “, appeared in my inbox, and I immediately thought of Barbara Pym’s A Glass of Blessings where Wilmet’s visions of meat in domed trollies feature against the very prosaic meals that are her regular fare on outings Piers. Wilmet, and A Glass of Blessings, was a wonderful recall. The chess players have been mainly edited out below, but the idea of Simpson’s -in-the-Strand opening again resonates warmly. As the idea did for Wilmet, who is observing a rather more substantial admirer than Piers:

I leaned back in my chair, well satisfied, both with my drink in such pleasant surroundings and with his devotion…I began to imagine future luncheons in town, the great joints of meat being wheeled up to the table in an unending procession, the chef standing deferentially with carving implements poised…(A Glass of Blessings, first published 1958)

Paradise regained: the reopening of Simpson’s

by Raymond Keene| @raykeene| @GM_RayKeene

Simpson’s-in-the-Strand is due to reopen this autumn after being closed for five years, ever since the Covid pandemic. For nearly two centuries, Simpson’s Grand Cigar Divan (as it was originally known) has been a landmark for chess players. The excitement is not least present with the new proprietor, the celebrated restaurateur Jeremy King. Here are his thoughts on the reopening:

“I was kept enthusiastic by the sheer pleasure of the number of inquiries I receive daily in the restaurants: ‘When is Simpson’s opening?’ – ‘Will you keep the Trolleys?’ etc – which taught us just how immense the anticipation is and kept us determined. Although after a period of thinking that we would never get the project over the line, there was a very telling moment when I returned to the site one day… I was showing around my friend, hotelier & restaurateur David and as we toured the building, he kept rather quiet, just gently nodding and hardly saying a word. To the extent that when we had finished the tour, he continued to be taciturn and I had assumed he didn’t like it or think a good idea, until he turned to me and said very firmly: ‘Jeremy, this is ***** FANTASTIC!’ And as is so often the case, seeing it through the eyes of others makes the case all the more compelling – rather like seeing our home City through new eyes does too.”…In spite of such history, the dining room that has seen more grandmasters than any other is Simpson’s. In the nineteenth century it was the world’s leading chess club. Its roast beef and lamb, carved from silver trolleys, were as famous as the games played upstairs. The chessboard at the top of the main staircase still commemorates the likes of Staunton, Anderssen, Morphy, Steinitz and Lasker. I played there myself on my fiftieth birthday and had my name added to the plaque.

Simpson’s was the scene of the Immortal Game in 1851, won by Anderssen. The game was so striking that messengers were sent down the Strand to telegraph the moves to chess fans in Paris. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle regularly visited Simpson’s: he may have modelled the appearance of his Professor Challenger on the world champion Wilhelm Steinitz, who played there often…

Simpson’s will soon open its doors again. The roast beef will return. And perhaps, upstairs, so will the chess…

Secret London

The Oldest Surviving Bridge In London Is Around 850 Years Old – And It Doesn’t Even Technically Cross The River Thames

This picturesque bridge dates all the way back to the 12th century, making it the oldest surviving bridge in the whole city.

 Katie Forge – Staff Writer • 8 September, 2025

London isn’t particularly thin on the ground in the bridge department. There are a plethora of picture-perfect pathways linking the separate sides of our city, ranging from tiny and twee to enormous and elaborate. And we Londoners can be pretty darn passionate about which of them we think is the best.

But whilst the subject of popularity may be up for debate; something that is undisputable is which of London’s abundance of bridges is the oldest. And that, my friends, would be Clattern Bridge.

Clattern Bridge

Now, I know it’s highly likely that you’ve never even heard of Clattern Bridge. But, fear not, folks – I’m here to tell you all about it. Picturesquely perched over in Kingston, this historic hidden gem is actually one of the oldest surviving bridges in the whole country. And – unlike most London bridges – it doesn’t technically cross the River Thames; it crosses the River Hogsmill (a tributary of the Thames, just before it flows into the main river).

The ancient Clattern Bridge in Kingston
Credit: Colin Smith via Wikimedia Commons / CC BY-SA 2.0

The ancient artefact dates all the way back to 1175, and features some rather impressive medieval masonry. The lower part of the bridge consists of three arches, made of local stone – and the structure was declared an ancient monument in 1938. Clattern Bridge now proudly boasts both a shiny, blue plaque, and Grade I listed status. Not bad going, hey?

Clattern Bridge has been widened a couple of times over the years, but not a great deal has changed about it in the last 850 years. Well, aside from the way in which people most commonly venture across it. The bridge was named after the sound made by the horses hooves that frequently trotted across it. Nowadays, I can’t imagine it receives quite as much hoof-fall.